采用ddPCR法评估FFPE样品的DNA产率

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
X.J. David Lu , Kelly Y.P. Liu , Yuqi Sarah Zhu , Cindy Cui , Catherine F. Poh
{"title":"采用ddPCR法评估FFPE样品的DNA产率","authors":"X.J. David Lu ,&nbsp;Kelly Y.P. Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqi Sarah Zhu ,&nbsp;Cindy Cui ,&nbsp;Catherine F. Poh","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Detection of genomic alterations in diseases can be achieved with current molecular technologies. However, the molecules extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bio-samples are often limited possibly due to DNA fragmentation and crosslinking caused by the sample fixation and processing. The study objective was to design a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to assess the quality and quantity of DNA derived from various DNA extraction conditions on FFPE samples.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used 10 μm-thick sections from 5 FFPE oral tumoral blocks, each consisting of 10–15 sections. The protocol variables tested included: 1) tissue staining; 2) duration and 3) temperature of post-digestion heat treatment; and 4) DNA extraction method. DNA quantity was assessed using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), the Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and a ddPCR-based assay. DNA quality was assessed using a ddPCR assay for the degree of fragmentation and the effectiveness of removing crosslinks with varying guanine-cytosine (GC)-content.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Deparaffinization with xylene helped to increase the DNA yield. Tissue staining (methyl green staining, pH 6) prior to microdissection, comparing to no staining, caused additional DNA fragmentation. Compared to column-based method, DNA extracted with phenol chloroform and ethanol precipitation increased the degree of fragmentation and lowered the yield of amplifiable DNA. The cross-linking derived from GC-contents may not be the only factor impacting on the DNA quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Samples undergoing different pre-treatment conditions prior to extraction can impact the yield of amplifiable DNA. Our ddPCR assay can be used to assess for both DNA quantity and quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"16 ","pages":"Pages 5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples\",\"authors\":\"X.J. David Lu ,&nbsp;Kelly Y.P. Liu ,&nbsp;Yuqi Sarah Zhu ,&nbsp;Cindy Cui ,&nbsp;Catherine F. Poh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Detection of genomic alterations in diseases can be achieved with current molecular technologies. However, the molecules extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bio-samples are often limited possibly due to DNA fragmentation and crosslinking caused by the sample fixation and processing. The study objective was to design a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to assess the quality and quantity of DNA derived from various DNA extraction conditions on FFPE samples.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used 10 μm-thick sections from 5 FFPE oral tumoral blocks, each consisting of 10–15 sections. The protocol variables tested included: 1) tissue staining; 2) duration and 3) temperature of post-digestion heat treatment; and 4) DNA extraction method. DNA quantity was assessed using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), the Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and a ddPCR-based assay. DNA quality was assessed using a ddPCR assay for the degree of fragmentation and the effectiveness of removing crosslinks with varying guanine-cytosine (GC)-content.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Deparaffinization with xylene helped to increase the DNA yield. Tissue staining (methyl green staining, pH 6) prior to microdissection, comparing to no staining, caused additional DNA fragmentation. Compared to column-based method, DNA extracted with phenol chloroform and ethanol precipitation increased the degree of fragmentation and lowered the yield of amplifiable DNA. The cross-linking derived from GC-contents may not be the only factor impacting on the DNA quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Samples undergoing different pre-treatment conditions prior to extraction can impact the yield of amplifiable DNA. Our ddPCR assay can be used to assess for both DNA quantity and quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 5-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2018.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753518300068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753518300068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的利用现有的分子技术可以实现疾病基因组改变的检测。然而,从福尔马林固定的石蜡包埋(FFPE)生物样品中提取的分子往往受到限制,这可能是由于样品固定和处理引起的DNA断裂和交联。本研究的目的是设计一种液滴数字PCR (ddPCR)方法来评估FFPE样品在不同条件下提取的DNA的质量和数量。方法取材于5个FFPE口腔肿瘤块,取10 μm厚的切片,每个切片10 ~ 15个。测试的方案变量包括:1)组织染色;2)消化后热处理的持续时间和温度;4) DNA提取方法。使用NanoDrop 2000(美国赛默飞世尔科技公司)、Qubit荧光仪(美国赛默飞世尔科技公司)和基于ddpcr的测定来评估DNA数量。使用ddPCR检测DNA的断裂程度和去除不同鸟嘌呤-胞嘧啶(GC)含量的交联的有效性来评估DNA质量。结果二甲苯脱亲有助于提高DNA产率。与未染色相比,在显微解剖之前进行组织染色(甲基绿染色,pH 6)会导致额外的DNA片段。与柱式提取法相比,苯酚氯仿和乙醇沉淀法提取DNA的破碎程度增加,可扩增DNA的产率降低。gc含量产生的交联可能不是影响DNA质量的唯一因素。结论样品在提取前不同的预处理条件会影响可扩增DNA的得率。我们的ddPCR检测可用于评估DNA的数量和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples

Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples

Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples

Using ddPCR to assess the DNA yield of FFPE samples

Objectives

Detection of genomic alterations in diseases can be achieved with current molecular technologies. However, the molecules extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bio-samples are often limited possibly due to DNA fragmentation and crosslinking caused by the sample fixation and processing. The study objective was to design a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to assess the quality and quantity of DNA derived from various DNA extraction conditions on FFPE samples.

Methods

We used 10 μm-thick sections from 5 FFPE oral tumoral blocks, each consisting of 10–15 sections. The protocol variables tested included: 1) tissue staining; 2) duration and 3) temperature of post-digestion heat treatment; and 4) DNA extraction method. DNA quantity was assessed using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), the Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and a ddPCR-based assay. DNA quality was assessed using a ddPCR assay for the degree of fragmentation and the effectiveness of removing crosslinks with varying guanine-cytosine (GC)-content.

Results

Deparaffinization with xylene helped to increase the DNA yield. Tissue staining (methyl green staining, pH 6) prior to microdissection, comparing to no staining, caused additional DNA fragmentation. Compared to column-based method, DNA extracted with phenol chloroform and ethanol precipitation increased the degree of fragmentation and lowered the yield of amplifiable DNA. The cross-linking derived from GC-contents may not be the only factor impacting on the DNA quality.

Conclusions

Samples undergoing different pre-treatment conditions prior to extraction can impact the yield of amplifiable DNA. Our ddPCR assay can be used to assess for both DNA quantity and quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信