实施家庭暴力诊断筛查的障碍。

Q4 Nursing
Practising Midwife Pub Date : 2017-05-01
Christian Wright, Sadie Geraghty
{"title":"实施家庭暴力诊断筛查的障碍。","authors":"Christian Wright,&nbsp;Sadie Geraghty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States of America and Europe, universal and routine screening is recommended for pregnant women, extending into the postnatal period. However, the lack of self-confidence among midwives and midwifery students, in implementing diagnostic domestic violence screening, is consistent within the contemporary literature, and has significant implications for the health of women and their families.The evidence for this lack of confidence centres around three professional issues surrounding domestic violence screening from a midwifery context: time constraints; midwifery education; and midwives as recipients of domestic violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":35678,"journal":{"name":"Practising Midwife","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to implementing diagnostic domestic violence screening.\",\"authors\":\"Christian Wright,&nbsp;Sadie Geraghty\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States of America and Europe, universal and routine screening is recommended for pregnant women, extending into the postnatal period. However, the lack of self-confidence among midwives and midwifery students, in implementing diagnostic domestic violence screening, is consistent within the contemporary literature, and has significant implications for the health of women and their families.The evidence for this lack of confidence centres around three professional issues surrounding domestic violence screening from a midwifery context: time constraints; midwifery education; and midwives as recipients of domestic violence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practising Midwife\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practising Midwife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practising Midwife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在联合王国、澳大利亚、美利坚合众国和欧洲,建议对孕妇进行普遍和常规的筛查,并延伸到产后。然而,助产士和助产学学生在实施诊断性家庭暴力筛查方面缺乏自信,这在当代文献中是一致的,并对妇女及其家庭的健康产生了重大影响。这种缺乏信心的证据集中在三个专业问题上,从助产的背景下进行家庭暴力筛查:时间限制;助产教育;助产士是家庭暴力的受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to implementing diagnostic domestic violence screening.

In the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States of America and Europe, universal and routine screening is recommended for pregnant women, extending into the postnatal period. However, the lack of self-confidence among midwives and midwifery students, in implementing diagnostic domestic violence screening, is consistent within the contemporary literature, and has significant implications for the health of women and their families.The evidence for this lack of confidence centres around three professional issues surrounding domestic violence screening from a midwifery context: time constraints; midwifery education; and midwives as recipients of domestic violence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practising Midwife
Practising Midwife Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信