不就是不!我们来谈谈同意。

Q4 Nursing
Practising Midwife Pub Date : 2017-04-01
Claire Feeley
{"title":"不就是不!我们来谈谈同意。","authors":"Claire Feeley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current changes in midwifery raise concerns about the erosion of women's choices and midwives' autonomy. This article is an exploration of women's legal rights that relate to consent and declining care. Using examples of poor practice, women's negative experiences are highlighted. However, this article demonstrates how midwifery practice can be grounded in the current legal framework in such a way that women's decisions are upheld and midwives feel supported in their advocacy role.</p>","PeriodicalId":35678,"journal":{"name":"Practising Midwife","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No means no! Let's talk about consent.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Feeley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current changes in midwifery raise concerns about the erosion of women's choices and midwives' autonomy. This article is an exploration of women's legal rights that relate to consent and declining care. Using examples of poor practice, women's negative experiences are highlighted. However, this article demonstrates how midwifery practice can be grounded in the current legal framework in such a way that women's decisions are upheld and midwives feel supported in their advocacy role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practising Midwife\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practising Midwife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practising Midwife","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前助产学的变化引起了人们对妇女选择权和助产士自主权受到侵蚀的担忧。这篇文章探讨了妇女在同意和拒绝照顾方面的法律权利。通过不良做法的例子,强调了妇女的负面经历。然而,这篇文章展示了如何将助产实践建立在当前的法律框架中,使妇女的决定得到维护,助产士在其倡导角色中感到得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No means no! Let's talk about consent.

Current changes in midwifery raise concerns about the erosion of women's choices and midwives' autonomy. This article is an exploration of women's legal rights that relate to consent and declining care. Using examples of poor practice, women's negative experiences are highlighted. However, this article demonstrates how midwifery practice can be grounded in the current legal framework in such a way that women's decisions are upheld and midwives feel supported in their advocacy role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practising Midwife
Practising Midwife Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信