苯和多环芳烃Lennard-Jones参数的理论研究

IF 3.1 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Xiaoqing You, Ying Li, Huangrui Mo and Yuxin Gui
{"title":"苯和多环芳烃Lennard-Jones参数的理论研究","authors":"Xiaoqing You, Ying Li, Huangrui Mo and Yuxin Gui","doi":"10.1039/D2FD00058J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Lennard-Jones (L-J) parameters, <em>i.e.</em> collision diameter and well depth, of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) interacting with bath gases helium and nitrogen are studied theoretically in this work. The results of three different computing methods, called SA, <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em>, <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> methods respectively, are compared with literature data. The SA method determines effective L-J parameters from the spherically averaged intermolecular potentials; the <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em> method averages L-J parameters obtained from different relative orientations of interacting partners; and the <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> method uses an orientation-averaging rule on the basis of two characteristic variables <em>η</em> and <em>ξ</em> representing repulsive and attractive energy scales respectively. The <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em> and <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> methods require much less computational time than the SA method due to the use of an iterative search algorithm. For validation of the L-J parameters, binary diffusion coefficients computed using L-J parameters by these three methods and those by empirical estimations are compared with experimental data from literature. Results show that while the SA method is reliable and the <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em> method is efficient, the <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> method is both reliable and efficient for computing L-J parameters for benzene and PAHs, and captures the anisotropic effects of molecular structure on L-J parameters better than empirical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":76,"journal":{"name":"Faraday Discussions","volume":"238 ","pages":" 103-120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical studies on Lennard-Jones parameters of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons†\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqing You, Ying Li, Huangrui Mo and Yuxin Gui\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D2FD00058J\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Lennard-Jones (L-J) parameters, <em>i.e.</em> collision diameter and well depth, of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) interacting with bath gases helium and nitrogen are studied theoretically in this work. The results of three different computing methods, called SA, <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em>, <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> methods respectively, are compared with literature data. The SA method determines effective L-J parameters from the spherically averaged intermolecular potentials; the <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em> method averages L-J parameters obtained from different relative orientations of interacting partners; and the <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> method uses an orientation-averaging rule on the basis of two characteristic variables <em>η</em> and <em>ξ</em> representing repulsive and attractive energy scales respectively. The <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em> and <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> methods require much less computational time than the SA method due to the use of an iterative search algorithm. For validation of the L-J parameters, binary diffusion coefficients computed using L-J parameters by these three methods and those by empirical estimations are compared with experimental data from literature. Results show that while the SA method is reliable and the <em>σ</em>–<em>ε</em> method is efficient, the <em>η</em>–<em>ξ</em> method is both reliable and efficient for computing L-J parameters for benzene and PAHs, and captures the anisotropic effects of molecular structure on L-J parameters better than empirical methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faraday Discussions\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\" 103-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faraday Discussions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/fd/d2fd00058j\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faraday Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/fd/d2fd00058j","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文从理论上研究了苯和多环芳烃(PAHs)与氦气和氮气相互作用时的碰撞直径和井深等Lennard-Jones (L-J)参数。用SA法、σ -ε法、η -ξ法三种不同计算方法的计算结果与文献数据进行了比较。SA法根据分子间球平均势确定有效的L-J参数;σ -ε法平均了相互作用伙伴不同相对取向的L-J参数;η -ξ法采用基于两个特征变量η和ξ分别表示排斥能和吸引能尺度的取向平均规则。σ -ε和η -ξ方法由于使用迭代搜索算法,比SA方法所需的计算时间要少得多。为了验证L-J参数,将三种方法计算的L-J参数和经验估计的二元扩散系数与文献中的实验数据进行了比较。结果表明,SA法和σ -ε法计算苯和多环芳烃的L-J参数是可靠的,η -ξ法计算苯和多环芳烃的L-J参数既可靠又有效,并且比经验方法更能捕捉到分子结构对L-J参数的各向异性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Theoretical studies on Lennard-Jones parameters of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons†

Theoretical studies on Lennard-Jones parameters of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons†

Lennard-Jones (L-J) parameters, i.e. collision diameter and well depth, of benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) interacting with bath gases helium and nitrogen are studied theoretically in this work. The results of three different computing methods, called SA, σε, ηξ methods respectively, are compared with literature data. The SA method determines effective L-J parameters from the spherically averaged intermolecular potentials; the σε method averages L-J parameters obtained from different relative orientations of interacting partners; and the ηξ method uses an orientation-averaging rule on the basis of two characteristic variables η and ξ representing repulsive and attractive energy scales respectively. The σε and ηξ methods require much less computational time than the SA method due to the use of an iterative search algorithm. For validation of the L-J parameters, binary diffusion coefficients computed using L-J parameters by these three methods and those by empirical estimations are compared with experimental data from literature. Results show that while the SA method is reliable and the σε method is efficient, the ηξ method is both reliable and efficient for computing L-J parameters for benzene and PAHs, and captures the anisotropic effects of molecular structure on L-J parameters better than empirical methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Faraday Discussions
Faraday Discussions 化学-物理化学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
259
期刊介绍: Discussion summary and research papers from discussion meetings that focus on rapidly developing areas of physical chemistry and its interfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信