在全基因组关联研究中调整人群分层的实用方法:主成分和倾向分数 (PCAPS)。

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q3 Mathematics
Huaqing Zhao, Nandita Mitra, Peter A Kanetsky, Katherine L Nathanson, Timothy R Rebbeck
{"title":"在全基因组关联研究中调整人群分层的实用方法:主成分和倾向分数 (PCAPS)。","authors":"Huaqing Zhao, Nandita Mitra, Peter A Kanetsky, Katherine L Nathanson, Timothy R Rebbeck","doi":"10.1515/sagmb-2017-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are susceptible to bias due to population stratification (PS). The most widely used method to correct bias due to PS is principal components (PCs) analysis (PCA), but there is no objective method to guide which PCs to include as covariates. Often, the ten PCs with the highest eigenvalues are included to adjust for PS. This selection is arbitrary, and patterns of local linkage disequilibrium may affect PCA corrections. To address these limitations, we estimate genomic propensity scores based on all statistically significant PCs selected by the Tracy-Widom (TW) statistic. We compare a principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS) approach to PCA and EMMAX using simulated GWAS data under no, moderate, and severe PS. PCAPS reduced spurious genetic associations regardless of the degree of PS, resulting in odds ratio (OR) estimates closer to the true OR. We illustrate our PCAPS method using GWAS data from a study of testicular germ cell tumors. PCAPS provided a more conservative adjustment than PCA. Advantages of the PCAPS approach include reduction of bias compared to PCA, consistent selection of propensity scores to adjust for PS, the potential ability to handle outliers, and ease of implementation using existing software packages.</p>","PeriodicalId":49477,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475581/pdf/nihms-1022442.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practical approach to adjusting for population stratification in genome-wide association studies: principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS).\",\"authors\":\"Huaqing Zhao, Nandita Mitra, Peter A Kanetsky, Katherine L Nathanson, Timothy R Rebbeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sagmb-2017-0054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are susceptible to bias due to population stratification (PS). The most widely used method to correct bias due to PS is principal components (PCs) analysis (PCA), but there is no objective method to guide which PCs to include as covariates. Often, the ten PCs with the highest eigenvalues are included to adjust for PS. This selection is arbitrary, and patterns of local linkage disequilibrium may affect PCA corrections. To address these limitations, we estimate genomic propensity scores based on all statistically significant PCs selected by the Tracy-Widom (TW) statistic. We compare a principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS) approach to PCA and EMMAX using simulated GWAS data under no, moderate, and severe PS. PCAPS reduced spurious genetic associations regardless of the degree of PS, resulting in odds ratio (OR) estimates closer to the true OR. We illustrate our PCAPS method using GWAS data from a study of testicular germ cell tumors. PCAPS provided a more conservative adjustment than PCA. Advantages of the PCAPS approach include reduction of bias compared to PCA, consistent selection of propensity scores to adjust for PS, the potential ability to handle outliers, and ease of implementation using existing software packages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475581/pdf/nihms-1022442.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2017-0054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2017-0054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全基因组关联研究(GWAS)很容易因人群分层(PS)而产生偏差。校正群体分层偏倚最广泛使用的方法是主成分分析(PCA),但目前还没有客观的方法来指导将哪些主成分作为协变量。通常情况下,我们会将特征值最高的十个 PC 纳入进来,以调整 PS。这种选择是任意的,而且局部连锁不平衡的模式可能会影响 PCA 校正。为了解决这些局限性,我们根据特雷西-维多姆(Tracy-Widom,TW)统计量选出的所有具有统计意义的 PC 来估算基因组倾向得分。我们使用无、中度和重度 PS 下的模拟 GWAS 数据,比较了主成分和倾向得分(PCAPS)方法与 PCA 和 EMMAX。无论 PS 的程度如何,PCAPS 都能减少虚假的遗传关联,从而使比值比 (OR) 估计值更接近真实 OR。我们使用睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤研究的 GWAS 数据来说明 PCAPS 方法。PCAPS 提供了比 PCA 更为保守的调整。PCAPS 方法的优点包括:与 PCA 相比减少了偏差、选择一致的倾向分数来调整 PS、具有处理异常值的潜在能力以及易于使用现有软件包实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A practical approach to adjusting for population stratification in genome-wide association studies: principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS).

A practical approach to adjusting for population stratification in genome-wide association studies: principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS).

A practical approach to adjusting for population stratification in genome-wide association studies: principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS).

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are susceptible to bias due to population stratification (PS). The most widely used method to correct bias due to PS is principal components (PCs) analysis (PCA), but there is no objective method to guide which PCs to include as covariates. Often, the ten PCs with the highest eigenvalues are included to adjust for PS. This selection is arbitrary, and patterns of local linkage disequilibrium may affect PCA corrections. To address these limitations, we estimate genomic propensity scores based on all statistically significant PCs selected by the Tracy-Widom (TW) statistic. We compare a principal components and propensity scores (PCAPS) approach to PCA and EMMAX using simulated GWAS data under no, moderate, and severe PS. PCAPS reduced spurious genetic associations regardless of the degree of PS, resulting in odds ratio (OR) estimates closer to the true OR. We illustrate our PCAPS method using GWAS data from a study of testicular germ cell tumors. PCAPS provided a more conservative adjustment than PCA. Advantages of the PCAPS approach include reduction of bias compared to PCA, consistent selection of propensity scores to adjust for PS, the potential ability to handle outliers, and ease of implementation using existing software packages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology seeks to publish significant research on the application of statistical ideas to problems arising from computational biology. The focus of the papers should be on the relevant statistical issues but should contain a succinct description of the relevant biological problem being considered. The range of topics is wide and will include topics such as linkage mapping, association studies, gene finding and sequence alignment, protein structure prediction, design and analysis of microarray data, molecular evolution and phylogenetic trees, DNA topology, and data base search strategies. Both original research and review articles will be warmly received.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信