{"title":"信念与反事实:信念归因的目的论。","authors":"Eva Rafetseder, Josef Perner","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/a000327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> The development and relation of counterfactual reasoning and false belief understanding were examined in 3- to 7-year-old children (<i>N</i> = 75) and adult controls (<i>N</i> = 14). The key question was whether false belief understanding engages counterfactual reasoning to infer what somebody else falsely believes. Findings revealed a strong correlation between false belief and counterfactual questions even in conditions in which children could commit errors other than the reality bias (<i>r</i> <sub><i>p</i></sub> = .51). The data suggest that mastery of belief attribution and counterfactual reasoning is not limited to one point in development but rather develops over a longer period. Moreover, the rare occurrence of reality errors calls into question whether young children's errors in the classic false belief task are indeed the result of a failure to inhibit what they know to be actually the case. The data speak in favor of a teleological theory of belief attribution and challenges established theories of belief attribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47289,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","volume":"226 2","pages":"110-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263035/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belief and Counterfactuality: A Teleological Theory of Belief Attribution.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Rafetseder, Josef Perner\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2151-2604/a000327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> The development and relation of counterfactual reasoning and false belief understanding were examined in 3- to 7-year-old children (<i>N</i> = 75) and adult controls (<i>N</i> = 14). The key question was whether false belief understanding engages counterfactual reasoning to infer what somebody else falsely believes. Findings revealed a strong correlation between false belief and counterfactual questions even in conditions in which children could commit errors other than the reality bias (<i>r</i> <sub><i>p</i></sub> = .51). The data suggest that mastery of belief attribution and counterfactual reasoning is not limited to one point in development but rather develops over a longer period. Moreover, the rare occurrence of reality errors calls into question whether young children's errors in the classic false belief task are indeed the result of a failure to inhibit what they know to be actually the case. The data speak in favor of a teleological theory of belief attribution and challenges established theories of belief attribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"226 2\",\"pages\":\"110-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
摘要
研究了3 ~ 7岁儿童(N = 75)和成人对照(N = 14)反事实推理和错误信念理解的发展及其相互关系。关键问题是错误信念理解是否使用反事实推理来推断别人错误的信念。研究结果显示,即使在儿童可能犯错误而不是现实偏见的情况下,错误信念和反事实问题之间也存在很强的相关性(r p = 0.51)。数据表明,对信念归因和反事实推理的掌握并不局限于一个发展阶段,而是在更长的时期内发展起来的。此外,现实错误的罕见发生引发了一个问题,即儿童在经典错误信念任务中的错误是否确实是由于未能抑制他们所知道的实际情况。这些数据支持信念归因的目的论,并对既定的信念归因理论提出了挑战。
Belief and Counterfactuality: A Teleological Theory of Belief Attribution.
The development and relation of counterfactual reasoning and false belief understanding were examined in 3- to 7-year-old children (N = 75) and adult controls (N = 14). The key question was whether false belief understanding engages counterfactual reasoning to infer what somebody else falsely believes. Findings revealed a strong correlation between false belief and counterfactual questions even in conditions in which children could commit errors other than the reality bias (rp = .51). The data suggest that mastery of belief attribution and counterfactual reasoning is not limited to one point in development but rather develops over a longer period. Moreover, the rare occurrence of reality errors calls into question whether young children's errors in the classic false belief task are indeed the result of a failure to inhibit what they know to be actually the case. The data speak in favor of a teleological theory of belief attribution and challenges established theories of belief attribution.