团体产前护理中的活动追踪装置:可行性研究。

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Michelle A Kominiarek, Heidi Vyhmeister, Lauren C Balmert, Paige Fairchild, Hallie Tolo, William Grobman, Melissa Simon
{"title":"团体产前护理中的活动追踪装置:可行性研究。","authors":"Michelle A Kominiarek,&nbsp;Heidi Vyhmeister,&nbsp;Lauren C Balmert,&nbsp;Paige Fairchild,&nbsp;Hallie Tolo,&nbsp;William Grobman,&nbsp;Melissa Simon","doi":"10.1089/biores.2018.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4-77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076-15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145-475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8-16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (<i>p</i> < 0.001 all comparisons). There were no differences in mean energy expenditure (MET-h/week) by PPAQ or ATD data at 28 weeks of gestation [231 (62-927 range) vs. 238 (212-290 range), <i>p</i> = 0.74] and at 36 weeks of gestation [145 (35-581 range) vs. 222 (196-272 range), <i>p</i> = 0.27]. Most women reported high satisfaction with an ATD in group prenatal care, yet adherence to the study protocol was low and ATD technical problems were common. As gestational age increased, activity decreased while sedentary time increased, suggesting that additional research is needed to find ways to engage women in physical activity during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9100,"journal":{"name":"BioResearch Open Access","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/biores.2018.0021","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle A Kominiarek,&nbsp;Heidi Vyhmeister,&nbsp;Lauren C Balmert,&nbsp;Paige Fairchild,&nbsp;Hallie Tolo,&nbsp;William Grobman,&nbsp;Melissa Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/biores.2018.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4-77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076-15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145-475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8-16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (<i>p</i> < 0.001 all comparisons). There were no differences in mean energy expenditure (MET-h/week) by PPAQ or ATD data at 28 weeks of gestation [231 (62-927 range) vs. 238 (212-290 range), <i>p</i> = 0.74] and at 36 weeks of gestation [145 (35-581 range) vs. 222 (196-272 range), <i>p</i> = 0.27]. Most women reported high satisfaction with an ATD in group prenatal care, yet adherence to the study protocol was low and ATD technical problems were common. As gestational age increased, activity decreased while sedentary time increased, suggesting that additional research is needed to find ways to engage women in physical activity during pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioResearch Open Access\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/biores.2018.0021\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioResearch Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioResearch Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

评估在集体产前护理中使用活动跟踪设备(ATD)的可行性(遵守研究方案和满意度)。如果女性(1)参加集体产前护理,(2)拥有智能手机,(3)没有活动限制,她们就会参加。妇女被要求每天佩戴ATD并同步。通过调查评估方案遵守情况和满意度。混合模型评估了胎龄和ATD数据之间的关系。将妊娠体力活动问卷(PPAQ)中自我报告的能量消耗与ATD计算的能量消耗进行比较。49名女性的基线特征如下:24岁,孕前体重指数28,80%为西班牙裔,86%为未产妇,妊娠21周。在完成随访调查的30名女性中,47%的人自我报告每天佩戴ATD,27%的人报告ATD丢失或损坏,22%的人报告技术问题;然而,97%的人喜欢戴它,100%的人会向怀孕的朋友推荐它,77%的人认为它能帮助他们达到活动目标。根据ATD数据,中位活动天数为47天(四分位间距[IQR]21-79),潜在活动天数的中位比例为43.7%(IQR 15.4-77.1)。对于前7天佩戴ATD的女性,平均步数/天为7574步(范围3076-15828),活动分钟数/天是277分钟(范围145-475),久坐时间/天是12小时(范围7.8-16.2)。随着胎龄的增加,在未调整和调整的模型中,平均对数步数减少,平均活动分钟减少,平均久坐时间增加(p p = 0.74]和妊娠36周时[145(35-581范围)vs.222(196-272范围),p = 0.27]。大多数妇女报告说,她们对ATD在集体产前护理中的满意度很高,但对研究方案的遵守率很低,ATD技术问题很常见。随着孕龄的增加,活动减少,而久坐时间增加,这表明需要更多的研究来寻找让女性在怀孕期间进行体育活动的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study.

Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study.

Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study.

Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study.

To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4-77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076-15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145-475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8-16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (p < 0.001 all comparisons). There were no differences in mean energy expenditure (MET-h/week) by PPAQ or ATD data at 28 weeks of gestation [231 (62-927 range) vs. 238 (212-290 range), p = 0.74] and at 36 weeks of gestation [145 (35-581 range) vs. 222 (196-272 range), p = 0.27]. Most women reported high satisfaction with an ATD in group prenatal care, yet adherence to the study protocol was low and ATD technical problems were common. As gestational age increased, activity decreased while sedentary time increased, suggesting that additional research is needed to find ways to engage women in physical activity during pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioResearch Open Access
BioResearch Open Access Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: BioResearch Open Access is a high-quality open access journal providing peer-reviewed research on a broad range of scientific topics, including molecular and cellular biology, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, stem cells, gene therapy, systems biology, genetics, virology, and neuroscience. The Journal publishes basic science and translational research in the form of original research articles, comprehensive review articles, mini-reviews, rapid communications, brief reports, technology reports, hypothesis articles, perspectives, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信