物理学的阶段在j.d.福布斯的论文第六为大英百科全书(1856年)。

IF 1.1 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
History of Science Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2018-12-03 DOI:10.1177/0073275318811443
Isobel Falconer
{"title":"物理学的阶段在j.d.福布斯的论文第六为大英百科全书(1856年)。","authors":"Isobel Falconer","doi":"10.1177/0073275318811443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper takes James David Forbes' <i>Encyclopaedia Britannica</i> entry, <i>Dissertation Sixth</i>, as a lens to examine physics as a cognitive, practical, and social enterprise. Forbes wrote this survey of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century mathematical and physical sciences between 1852 and 1856, when British \"physics\" was at a pivotal point in its history, situated between a field identified by its mathematical methods - originating in France - and a discipline identified by its university laboratory institutions. Contemporary encyclopedias provided a nexus for publishers, the book trade, readers, and men of science in the formation of physics as a field. Forbes was both a witness, whose account of the progress of physics or natural philosophy can be explored at face value, and an agent, who exploited the opportunity offered by the <i>Encyclopaedia Britannica</i> in the mid nineteenth century to enroll the broadly educated public and scientific collective, illuminating the connection between the definition of physics and its forms of social practice. Forbes used the terms \"physics\" and \"natural philosophy\" interchangeably. He portrayed the field as progressed by the natural genius of great men who curated it within an associational culture that engendered true intellectual spirit. Although this societal mechanism was becoming ineffective, Forbes did not see university institutions as the way forward. Instead, running counter to his friend William Whewell, he advocated inclusion of the mechanical arts (engineering), and a strictly limited role for mathematics. He revealed tensions when the widely accepted discovery-based historiography conflicted with intellectual and moral worth, reflecting a nineteenth-century concern with spirit that cuts across twentieth-century questions about discipline and field.</p>","PeriodicalId":50404,"journal":{"name":"History of Science","volume":"59 1","pages":"47-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0073275318811443","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phases of physics in J. D. Forbes' <i>Dissertation Sixth</i> for the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1856).\",\"authors\":\"Isobel Falconer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0073275318811443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper takes James David Forbes' <i>Encyclopaedia Britannica</i> entry, <i>Dissertation Sixth</i>, as a lens to examine physics as a cognitive, practical, and social enterprise. Forbes wrote this survey of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century mathematical and physical sciences between 1852 and 1856, when British \\\"physics\\\" was at a pivotal point in its history, situated between a field identified by its mathematical methods - originating in France - and a discipline identified by its university laboratory institutions. Contemporary encyclopedias provided a nexus for publishers, the book trade, readers, and men of science in the formation of physics as a field. Forbes was both a witness, whose account of the progress of physics or natural philosophy can be explored at face value, and an agent, who exploited the opportunity offered by the <i>Encyclopaedia Britannica</i> in the mid nineteenth century to enroll the broadly educated public and scientific collective, illuminating the connection between the definition of physics and its forms of social practice. Forbes used the terms \\\"physics\\\" and \\\"natural philosophy\\\" interchangeably. He portrayed the field as progressed by the natural genius of great men who curated it within an associational culture that engendered true intellectual spirit. Although this societal mechanism was becoming ineffective, Forbes did not see university institutions as the way forward. Instead, running counter to his friend William Whewell, he advocated inclusion of the mechanical arts (engineering), and a strictly limited role for mathematics. He revealed tensions when the widely accepted discovery-based historiography conflicted with intellectual and moral worth, reflecting a nineteenth-century concern with spirit that cuts across twentieth-century questions about discipline and field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Science\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"47-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0073275318811443\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275318811443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275318811443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文采用詹姆斯·大卫·福布斯的《大英百科全书》条目,论文第六,作为一个镜头来检查物理学作为一个认知,实践和社会企业。福布斯在1852年至1856年间撰写了这份关于18世纪和19世纪数学和物理科学的调查报告,当时英国“物理学”正处于其历史上的关键时刻,处于由其数学方法确定的领域(起源于法国)和由其大学实验室机构确定的学科之间。当代的百科全书为出版商、图书贸易商、读者和科学家提供了一个联系纽带,使物理学成为一个领域。福布斯既是一个见证者,他对物理学或自然哲学进步的描述可以从表面上进行探索,也是一个代理人,他利用19世纪中叶《大英百科全书》提供的机会,招募受过广泛教育的公众和科学团体,阐明了物理学的定义与其社会实践形式之间的联系。《福布斯》交替使用“物理学”和“自然哲学”这两个词。他把这个领域描绘成由伟大人物的自然天才推动的,他们在一种产生真正知识分子精神的联合文化中策划了这个领域。虽然这种社会机制变得越来越无效,但福布斯并不认为大学机构是前进的道路。相反,与他的朋友威廉·休威尔(William Whewell)相反,他主张将机械艺术(工程学)纳入其中,并严格限制数学的作用。他揭示了被广泛接受的以发现为基础的史学与知识和道德价值相冲突时的紧张关系,反映了19世纪对精神的关注,这种关注贯穿了20世纪对学科和领域的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phases of physics in J. D. Forbes' Dissertation Sixth for the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1856).

This paper takes James David Forbes' Encyclopaedia Britannica entry, Dissertation Sixth, as a lens to examine physics as a cognitive, practical, and social enterprise. Forbes wrote this survey of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century mathematical and physical sciences between 1852 and 1856, when British "physics" was at a pivotal point in its history, situated between a field identified by its mathematical methods - originating in France - and a discipline identified by its university laboratory institutions. Contemporary encyclopedias provided a nexus for publishers, the book trade, readers, and men of science in the formation of physics as a field. Forbes was both a witness, whose account of the progress of physics or natural philosophy can be explored at face value, and an agent, who exploited the opportunity offered by the Encyclopaedia Britannica in the mid nineteenth century to enroll the broadly educated public and scientific collective, illuminating the connection between the definition of physics and its forms of social practice. Forbes used the terms "physics" and "natural philosophy" interchangeably. He portrayed the field as progressed by the natural genius of great men who curated it within an associational culture that engendered true intellectual spirit. Although this societal mechanism was becoming ineffective, Forbes did not see university institutions as the way forward. Instead, running counter to his friend William Whewell, he advocated inclusion of the mechanical arts (engineering), and a strictly limited role for mathematics. He revealed tensions when the widely accepted discovery-based historiography conflicted with intellectual and moral worth, reflecting a nineteenth-century concern with spirit that cuts across twentieth-century questions about discipline and field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Science
History of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History of Science is peer reviewed journal devoted to the history of science, medicine and technology from earliest times to the present day. Articles discussing methodology, and reviews of the current state of knowledge and possibilities for future research, are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信