膝关节后外侧角:关于诊断、分类、治疗和康复的专家共识声明。

Jorge Chahla, Iain R Murray, James Robinson, Koen Lagae, Fabrizio Margheritini, Brett Fritsch, Manuel Leyes, Björn Barenius, Nicolas Pujol, Lars Engebretsen, Martin Lind, Moises Cohen, Rodrigo Maestu, Alan Getgood, Gonzalo Ferrer, Silvio Villascusa, Soshi Uchida, Bruce A Levy, Richard Von Bormann, Charles Brown, Jacques Menetrey, Michael Hantes, Timothy Lording, Kristian Samuelsson, Karl Heinz Frosch, Juan Carlos Monllau, David Parker, Robert F LaPrade, Pablo E Gelber
{"title":"膝关节后外侧角:关于诊断、分类、治疗和康复的专家共识声明。","authors":"Jorge Chahla,&nbsp;Iain R Murray,&nbsp;James Robinson,&nbsp;Koen Lagae,&nbsp;Fabrizio Margheritini,&nbsp;Brett Fritsch,&nbsp;Manuel Leyes,&nbsp;Björn Barenius,&nbsp;Nicolas Pujol,&nbsp;Lars Engebretsen,&nbsp;Martin Lind,&nbsp;Moises Cohen,&nbsp;Rodrigo Maestu,&nbsp;Alan Getgood,&nbsp;Gonzalo Ferrer,&nbsp;Silvio Villascusa,&nbsp;Soshi Uchida,&nbsp;Bruce A Levy,&nbsp;Richard Von Bormann,&nbsp;Charles Brown,&nbsp;Jacques Menetrey,&nbsp;Michael Hantes,&nbsp;Timothy Lording,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson,&nbsp;Karl Heinz Frosch,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Monllau,&nbsp;David Parker,&nbsp;Robert F LaPrade,&nbsp;Pablo E Gelber","doi":"10.1007/s00167-018-5260-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a statement on the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation concepts of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee using a modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of three individuals generated a list of statements relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries to form the basis of an initial survey for rating by an international group of experts. The PLC expert group (composed of 27 experts throughout the world) was surveyed on three occasions to establish consensus on the inclusion/exclusion of each item. In addition to rating agreement, experts were invited to propose further items for inclusion or to suggest modifications of existing items at each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. Statements reaching consensus in round three were included within the final consensus document.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven experts (100% response rate) completed three rounds of surveys. After three rounds, 29 items achieved consensus with over 75% agreement and less than 5% disagreement. Consensus was reached in 92% of the statements relating to diagnosis of PLC injuries, 100% relating to classification, 70% relating to treatment and in 88% of items relating to rehabilitation statements, with an overall consensus of 81%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has established a consensus statement relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries. Further research is needed to develop updated classification systems, and better understand the role of non-invasive and minimally invasive approaches along with standardized rehabilitation protocols.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Consensus of expert opinion, Level V.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":"2520-2529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00167-018-5260-4","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterolateral corner of the knee: an expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Chahla,&nbsp;Iain R Murray,&nbsp;James Robinson,&nbsp;Koen Lagae,&nbsp;Fabrizio Margheritini,&nbsp;Brett Fritsch,&nbsp;Manuel Leyes,&nbsp;Björn Barenius,&nbsp;Nicolas Pujol,&nbsp;Lars Engebretsen,&nbsp;Martin Lind,&nbsp;Moises Cohen,&nbsp;Rodrigo Maestu,&nbsp;Alan Getgood,&nbsp;Gonzalo Ferrer,&nbsp;Silvio Villascusa,&nbsp;Soshi Uchida,&nbsp;Bruce A Levy,&nbsp;Richard Von Bormann,&nbsp;Charles Brown,&nbsp;Jacques Menetrey,&nbsp;Michael Hantes,&nbsp;Timothy Lording,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson,&nbsp;Karl Heinz Frosch,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Monllau,&nbsp;David Parker,&nbsp;Robert F LaPrade,&nbsp;Pablo E Gelber\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00167-018-5260-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a statement on the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation concepts of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee using a modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of three individuals generated a list of statements relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries to form the basis of an initial survey for rating by an international group of experts. The PLC expert group (composed of 27 experts throughout the world) was surveyed on three occasions to establish consensus on the inclusion/exclusion of each item. In addition to rating agreement, experts were invited to propose further items for inclusion or to suggest modifications of existing items at each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. Statements reaching consensus in round three were included within the final consensus document.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven experts (100% response rate) completed three rounds of surveys. After three rounds, 29 items achieved consensus with over 75% agreement and less than 5% disagreement. Consensus was reached in 92% of the statements relating to diagnosis of PLC injuries, 100% relating to classification, 70% relating to treatment and in 88% of items relating to rehabilitation statements, with an overall consensus of 81%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has established a consensus statement relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries. Further research is needed to develop updated classification systems, and better understand the role of non-invasive and minimally invasive approaches along with standardized rehabilitation protocols.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Consensus of expert opinion, Level V.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2520-2529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00167-018-5260-4\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5260-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5260-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

目的:利用改进的德尔菲技术对膝关节后外侧角(PLC)损伤的诊断、分类、治疗和康复概念进行阐述。方法:由三个人组成的工作组生成了与PLC损伤的诊断、分类、治疗和康复有关的陈述清单,以形成国际专家组评估的初步调查基础。PLC专家组(由世界各地的27名专家组成)进行了三次调查,以就每个项目的列入/排除达成协商一致意见。除了就评级达成一致意见外,还请专家们在每一轮提出进一步列入的项目或对现有项目提出修改建议。在每次调查后,使用预先定义的标准来完善项目列表。第三轮达成协商一致意见的发言列入最后的协商一致文件。结果:27名专家完成3轮问卷调查,回复率100%。经过三轮协商,达成共识的项目有29项,一致率在75%以上,不一致率在5%以下。在与PLC损伤诊断有关的陈述中,92%达成共识,100%与分类有关,70%与治疗有关,88%与康复有关的陈述,总体共识为81%。结论:本研究建立了关于PLC损伤的诊断、分类、治疗和康复的共识声明。需要进一步的研究来开发更新的分类系统,并更好地了解非侵入性和微创方法以及标准化康复方案的作用。证据等级:专家意见一致,等级V。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posterolateral corner of the knee: an expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation.

Purpose: To develop a statement on the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation concepts of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee using a modified Delphi technique.

Methods: A working group of three individuals generated a list of statements relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries to form the basis of an initial survey for rating by an international group of experts. The PLC expert group (composed of 27 experts throughout the world) was surveyed on three occasions to establish consensus on the inclusion/exclusion of each item. In addition to rating agreement, experts were invited to propose further items for inclusion or to suggest modifications of existing items at each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. Statements reaching consensus in round three were included within the final consensus document.

Results: Twenty-seven experts (100% response rate) completed three rounds of surveys. After three rounds, 29 items achieved consensus with over 75% agreement and less than 5% disagreement. Consensus was reached in 92% of the statements relating to diagnosis of PLC injuries, 100% relating to classification, 70% relating to treatment and in 88% of items relating to rehabilitation statements, with an overall consensus of 81%.

Conclusions: This study has established a consensus statement relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries. Further research is needed to develop updated classification systems, and better understand the role of non-invasive and minimally invasive approaches along with standardized rehabilitation protocols.

Level of evidence: Consensus of expert opinion, Level V.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信