人类时间对分的对数与线性时序:一个信号检测理论研究。

IF 1.3 4区心理学

Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.1037/xan0000184

Jérémie Jozefowiez, Clément Gaudichon, Francis Mekkass, Armando Machado

{"title":"人类时间对分的对数与线性时序:一个信号检测理论研究。","authors":"Jérémie Jozefowiez, Clément Gaudichon, Francis Mekkass, Armando Machado","doi":"10.1037/xan0000184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":51088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":"44 4","pages":"396-408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Log versus linear timing in human temporal bisection: A signal detection theory study.\",\"authors\":\"Jérémie Jozefowiez, Clément Gaudichon, Francis Mekkass, Armando Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xan0000184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"44 4\",\"pages\":\"396-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000184\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

利用信号检测理论，我们研究了人类参与者在等分任务中是线性地还是对数地表示时间。参与者看到一个持续1.0到1.5秒的刺激，然后判断刺激的持续时间是接近1.0秒还是接近1.5秒，以及他们对自己的反应有多确定。虽然主观刺激持续时间的平均值是客观刺激持续时间的线性函数，但参与者产生的心理物理功能却有显著差异——有些参与者是线性的，有些是凹的，还有一些是凸的。因此，适当的问题可能不是人类对时间进行线性编码还是对数编码，而是对哪些参与者以及在哪些条件下对时间进行线性编码、对数编码甚至指数编码。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2018 APA，版权所有)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Log versus linear timing in human temporal bisection: A signal detection theory study.

Using signal detection theory, we investigated whether human participants represent time linearly or logarithmically in a bisection task. Participants saw a stimulus 1.0 to 1.5 s in duration, and then judged whether the stimulus duration was closer to 1.0 s or to 1.5 s, and how sure they were of their response. Whereas the mean of the subjective stimulus duration was a linear function of the objective stimulus duration, participants produced remarkably different psychophysical functions-linear for some participants, concave for others, and convex for still others. Hence, the appropriate question might not be whether humans encode time linearly or logarithmically, but for which participants and under which conditions is time encoded linearly, logarithmically, or even exponentially. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition 生物-动物学

自引率

23.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.