参加纵向定性研究对家庭、儿童和青少年的潜在益处。

IRB Pub Date : 2018-07-01
Minisha Lohani, Kristopher A Hendershot, Wendy Pelletier, Kristin Stegenga, Margie Dixon, Pamela S Hinds, Melissa A Alderfer, Rebecca D Pentz
{"title":"参加纵向定性研究对家庭、儿童和青少年的潜在益处。","authors":"Minisha Lohani,&nbsp;Kristopher A Hendershot,&nbsp;Wendy Pelletier,&nbsp;Kristin Stegenga,&nbsp;Margie Dixon,&nbsp;Pamela S Hinds,&nbsp;Melissa A Alderfer,&nbsp;Rebecca D Pentz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has focused on the risks of research participation but has rarely considered possible benefits. For a study of family decision-making during pediatric bone marrow transplant, we conducted qualitative interviews with 132 family members across 36 families up to three times over the course of a year, before and after transplant. We concluded the study with qualitative interviews of 70 family members from 21 of the original families one year after the transplants, focusing on benefits and concerns regarding their research participation. Participants, including children and adolescents, reported benefits including the opportunity to talk, be altruistic, reflect, have a safe space, gain understanding or perspective, and express emotions. Sixteen percent expressed concerns, mostly finding aspects of the methodology annoying. We encourage institutional review boards to understand that sensitive conversations with adults, children or adolescents may not always increase the risk of the study and may offer benefits to those who agree to be interviewed. We therefore suggest that language describing potential benefits could be included in consent and assent forms for qualitative studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73513,"journal":{"name":"IRB","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.\",\"authors\":\"Minisha Lohani,&nbsp;Kristopher A Hendershot,&nbsp;Wendy Pelletier,&nbsp;Kristin Stegenga,&nbsp;Margie Dixon,&nbsp;Pamela S Hinds,&nbsp;Melissa A Alderfer,&nbsp;Rebecca D Pentz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research has focused on the risks of research participation but has rarely considered possible benefits. For a study of family decision-making during pediatric bone marrow transplant, we conducted qualitative interviews with 132 family members across 36 families up to three times over the course of a year, before and after transplant. We concluded the study with qualitative interviews of 70 family members from 21 of the original families one year after the transplants, focusing on benefits and concerns regarding their research participation. Participants, including children and adolescents, reported benefits including the opportunity to talk, be altruistic, reflect, have a safe space, gain understanding or perspective, and express emotions. Sixteen percent expressed concerns, mostly finding aspects of the methodology annoying. We encourage institutional review boards to understand that sensitive conversations with adults, children or adolescents may not always increase the risk of the study and may offer benefits to those who agree to be interviewed. We therefore suggest that language describing potential benefits could be included in consent and assent forms for qualitative studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRB\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前的研究关注的是参与研究的风险,但很少考虑可能的好处。为了研究儿科骨髓移植期间的家庭决策,我们在移植前后一年中对36个家庭的132名家庭成员进行了三次定性访谈。我们在移植一年后对来自21个原始家庭的70名家庭成员进行了定性访谈,重点关注他们参与研究的好处和担忧。包括儿童和青少年在内的参与者报告的好处包括有机会交谈、无私、反思、有一个安全的空间、获得理解或观点,以及表达情感。16%的人表达了担忧,大多数人认为这种方法令人讨厌。我们鼓励机构审查委员会理解,与成人、儿童或青少年进行敏感的谈话并不总是会增加研究的风险,而且可能会给同意接受采访的人带来好处。因此,我们建议在定性研究的同意和同意表格中加入描述潜在益处的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential Benefits to Families, Children, and Adolescents Enrolled in Longitudinal Qualitative Research.

Previous research has focused on the risks of research participation but has rarely considered possible benefits. For a study of family decision-making during pediatric bone marrow transplant, we conducted qualitative interviews with 132 family members across 36 families up to three times over the course of a year, before and after transplant. We concluded the study with qualitative interviews of 70 family members from 21 of the original families one year after the transplants, focusing on benefits and concerns regarding their research participation. Participants, including children and adolescents, reported benefits including the opportunity to talk, be altruistic, reflect, have a safe space, gain understanding or perspective, and express emotions. Sixteen percent expressed concerns, mostly finding aspects of the methodology annoying. We encourage institutional review boards to understand that sensitive conversations with adults, children or adolescents may not always increase the risk of the study and may offer benefits to those who agree to be interviewed. We therefore suggest that language describing potential benefits could be included in consent and assent forms for qualitative studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IRB
IRB
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信