利用药学学生和技术人员改善入学用药史:一项药学驱动的改进倡议。

Q1 Medicine
P and T Pub Date : 2018-11-01
Katerina Petrov, Ranjani Varadarajan, Martha Healy, Elmira Darvish, Cathleen Cowden
{"title":"利用药学学生和技术人员改善入学用药史:一项药学驱动的改进倡议。","authors":"Katerina Petrov,&nbsp;Ranjani Varadarajan,&nbsp;Martha Healy,&nbsp;Elmira Darvish,&nbsp;Cathleen Cowden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because of the frequency of medication errors related to care transitions, patient-safety initiatives have recently focused on improving the patient medication list. Pharmacy student and technician participation in the medication-history process has been shown to improve the quality of medication histories. To improve patient care, a pharmacy-driven medication-history service utilizing a unique hybrid team of pharmacy students and technicians was launched at Inova Loudoun Hospital (ILH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the service was to improve patient safety and therapy by providing the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) for admitted acute-care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for the medication-history service was collected for six months from July 2015 to January 2016. The service included pharmacy technicians and fourth-year pharmacy students using the BPMH approach to verify patients' allergies, medications, doses, and frequencies, and to ensure optimal documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Data on types and numbers of discrepancies and interventions were collected during the process. Readmission rates for the study group were calculated and compared to readmission rates for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,070 patients interviewed, 77.7% (3,162) had at least one discrepancy in their medication list. Per patient, the average number of medications was 7.47, with an average of 1.8 discrepancies. Pharmacy students identified more discrepancies per patient than pharmacy technicians, 2.3 versus 1.5, respectively. Readmission rates for patients interviewed by the medication-history team was lower than for all patients during the same period, as well as for all patients during the same period in the previous year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pharmacy-driven medication-history service, staffed with pharmacy technicians and students using a structured BPMH approach, increased the accuracy of home-medication lists on patient admission. The service demonstrated a difference in the types of interventions provided by pharmacy students and technicians. Readmission rates were also lower for patients with completed BPMH.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"43 11","pages":"676-684"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205119/pdf/ptj43011676.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Medication History at Admission Utilizing Pharmacy Students and Technicians: A Pharmacy-Driven Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Katerina Petrov,&nbsp;Ranjani Varadarajan,&nbsp;Martha Healy,&nbsp;Elmira Darvish,&nbsp;Cathleen Cowden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because of the frequency of medication errors related to care transitions, patient-safety initiatives have recently focused on improving the patient medication list. Pharmacy student and technician participation in the medication-history process has been shown to improve the quality of medication histories. To improve patient care, a pharmacy-driven medication-history service utilizing a unique hybrid team of pharmacy students and technicians was launched at Inova Loudoun Hospital (ILH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the service was to improve patient safety and therapy by providing the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) for admitted acute-care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for the medication-history service was collected for six months from July 2015 to January 2016. The service included pharmacy technicians and fourth-year pharmacy students using the BPMH approach to verify patients' allergies, medications, doses, and frequencies, and to ensure optimal documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Data on types and numbers of discrepancies and interventions were collected during the process. Readmission rates for the study group were calculated and compared to readmission rates for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,070 patients interviewed, 77.7% (3,162) had at least one discrepancy in their medication list. Per patient, the average number of medications was 7.47, with an average of 1.8 discrepancies. Pharmacy students identified more discrepancies per patient than pharmacy technicians, 2.3 versus 1.5, respectively. Readmission rates for patients interviewed by the medication-history team was lower than for all patients during the same period, as well as for all patients during the same period in the previous year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pharmacy-driven medication-history service, staffed with pharmacy technicians and students using a structured BPMH approach, increased the accuracy of home-medication lists on patient admission. The service demonstrated a difference in the types of interventions provided by pharmacy students and technicians. Readmission rates were also lower for patients with completed BPMH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"P and T\",\"volume\":\"43 11\",\"pages\":\"676-684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205119/pdf/ptj43011676.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"P and T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于与护理转换相关的用药错误的频率,患者安全倡议最近集中在改善患者用药清单上。药学专业学生和技术人员参与用药史过程已被证明可以提高用药史的质量。为了改善患者护理,Inova Loudoun医院(ILH)推出了一项由药房学生和技术人员组成的独特混合团队的药房驱动的用药史服务。目的:该服务的目的是通过为入院的急性护理患者提供最佳用药史(BPMH)来改善患者安全和治疗。方法:收集2015年7月至2016年1月6个月的用药史服务数据。该服务包括药房技术人员和四年级药房学生,他们使用BPMH方法来验证患者的过敏、药物、剂量和频率,并确保电子健康记录(EHR)中的最佳文档。在此过程中收集了有关差异和干预措施的类型和数量的数据。计算研究组的再入院率,并与所有患者的再入院率进行比较。结果:在4070名受访患者中,77.7%(3162人)的用药清单至少存在一项差异。每位患者平均用药次数为7.47次,平均差异为1.8次。药学专业的学生比药学技术人员在每个病人身上发现了更多的差异,分别为2.3和1.5。用药史小组采访的患者再入院率低于同期的所有患者,也低于前一年同期的所有患者。结论:这种药房驱动的用药史服务,由药学技术人员和学生组成,采用结构化的BPMH方法,提高了患者入院时家庭用药清单的准确性。该服务显示了药学专业学生和技术人员提供的干预措施类型的差异。完成BPMH的患者再入院率也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving Medication History at Admission Utilizing Pharmacy Students and Technicians: A Pharmacy-Driven Improvement Initiative.

Improving Medication History at Admission Utilizing Pharmacy Students and Technicians: A Pharmacy-Driven Improvement Initiative.

Improving Medication History at Admission Utilizing Pharmacy Students and Technicians: A Pharmacy-Driven Improvement Initiative.

Improving Medication History at Admission Utilizing Pharmacy Students and Technicians: A Pharmacy-Driven Improvement Initiative.

Background: Because of the frequency of medication errors related to care transitions, patient-safety initiatives have recently focused on improving the patient medication list. Pharmacy student and technician participation in the medication-history process has been shown to improve the quality of medication histories. To improve patient care, a pharmacy-driven medication-history service utilizing a unique hybrid team of pharmacy students and technicians was launched at Inova Loudoun Hospital (ILH).

Objective: The objective of the service was to improve patient safety and therapy by providing the Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) for admitted acute-care patients.

Methods: Data for the medication-history service was collected for six months from July 2015 to January 2016. The service included pharmacy technicians and fourth-year pharmacy students using the BPMH approach to verify patients' allergies, medications, doses, and frequencies, and to ensure optimal documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). Data on types and numbers of discrepancies and interventions were collected during the process. Readmission rates for the study group were calculated and compared to readmission rates for all patients.

Results: Out of 4,070 patients interviewed, 77.7% (3,162) had at least one discrepancy in their medication list. Per patient, the average number of medications was 7.47, with an average of 1.8 discrepancies. Pharmacy students identified more discrepancies per patient than pharmacy technicians, 2.3 versus 1.5, respectively. Readmission rates for patients interviewed by the medication-history team was lower than for all patients during the same period, as well as for all patients during the same period in the previous year.

Conclusion: This pharmacy-driven medication-history service, staffed with pharmacy technicians and students using a structured BPMH approach, increased the accuracy of home-medication lists on patient admission. The service demonstrated a difference in the types of interventions provided by pharmacy students and technicians. Readmission rates were also lower for patients with completed BPMH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信