[牙齿活动性评估-与牙科评估-的比较]。

Tomoki Ishikawa, Masahiko Oiwa, Eriko Minami, Hideyuki Mieda, Sachiko Sato, Mizue Ishii, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Takeshi Mikane, Tomihiro Fukushima, Hiroaki Tokioka
{"title":"[牙齿活动性评估-与牙科评估-的比较]。","authors":"Tomoki Ishikawa,&nbsp;Masahiko Oiwa,&nbsp;Eriko Minami,&nbsp;Hideyuki Mieda,&nbsp;Sachiko Sato,&nbsp;Mizue Ishii,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Takeshi Mikane,&nbsp;Tomihiro Fukushima,&nbsp;Hiroaki Tokioka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with mobile teeth are at an increased risk of tooth injury related to tracheal intu- bation. Although the presence/absence of mobile teeth is confirmed through interviews during preoperative visits, patients are frequently unaware of the presence of such teeth. In our facility, dental consultation is pro- vided for all patients undergoing thoracoscopically- assisted surgery as part of the management of oral hygiene. This study examined the presence/absence of mobile teeth reported by patients during preoperative visits and those identified on dental consultation, focus- ing on the inconsistency between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone thoraco- scopically-assisted surgery in our facility between Janu- ary and October 2014 were retrospectively studied. Tooth mobility was evaluated using the Miller index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 76 (46 males and 30 females) patients aged 36 to 88 (mean: 67.8), mobile teeth were identified on dental consultation in 13 and reported during preoperative visits by 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this findings, it may be nec- essary to pay sufficient attention when inserting tubes even when mobile teeth have not been reported by patients during preoperative visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Tooth Mobility Evaluation -A Comparison with Dental Assessment-].\",\"authors\":\"Tomoki Ishikawa,&nbsp;Masahiko Oiwa,&nbsp;Eriko Minami,&nbsp;Hideyuki Mieda,&nbsp;Sachiko Sato,&nbsp;Mizue Ishii,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Takeshi Mikane,&nbsp;Tomihiro Fukushima,&nbsp;Hiroaki Tokioka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with mobile teeth are at an increased risk of tooth injury related to tracheal intu- bation. Although the presence/absence of mobile teeth is confirmed through interviews during preoperative visits, patients are frequently unaware of the presence of such teeth. In our facility, dental consultation is pro- vided for all patients undergoing thoracoscopically- assisted surgery as part of the management of oral hygiene. This study examined the presence/absence of mobile teeth reported by patients during preoperative visits and those identified on dental consultation, focus- ing on the inconsistency between them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who had undergone thoraco- scopically-assisted surgery in our facility between Janu- ary and October 2014 were retrospectively studied. Tooth mobility was evaluated using the Miller index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 76 (46 males and 30 females) patients aged 36 to 88 (mean: 67.8), mobile teeth were identified on dental consultation in 13 and reported during preoperative visits by 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on this findings, it may be nec- essary to pay sufficient attention when inserting tubes even when mobile teeth have not been reported by patients during preoperative visits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动牙齿的患者在气管插管相关的牙齿损伤风险增加。虽然通过术前访问的访谈可以确认是否存在活动牙,但患者往往不知道这种牙齿的存在。在我们的诊所,所有接受胸腔镜辅助手术的病人都可以接受牙科咨询,这是口腔卫生管理的一部分。本研究调查了患者在术前就诊时报告的活动牙的存在/不存在,以及在牙科咨询时发现的,重点是它们之间的不一致。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至10月在我院行胸腔镜辅助手术的患者。采用Miller指数评估牙齿活动性。结果:76例患者(男46例,女30例),年龄36 ~ 88岁(平均67.8岁),其中13例在牙科会诊时发现移动牙,8例在术前就诊时报告移动牙。结论:基于这些发现,即使患者在术前就诊时未报告移动牙齿,在插入管时也有必要引起足够的注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Tooth Mobility Evaluation -A Comparison with Dental Assessment-].

Background: Patients with mobile teeth are at an increased risk of tooth injury related to tracheal intu- bation. Although the presence/absence of mobile teeth is confirmed through interviews during preoperative visits, patients are frequently unaware of the presence of such teeth. In our facility, dental consultation is pro- vided for all patients undergoing thoracoscopically- assisted surgery as part of the management of oral hygiene. This study examined the presence/absence of mobile teeth reported by patients during preoperative visits and those identified on dental consultation, focus- ing on the inconsistency between them.

Methods: Patients who had undergone thoraco- scopically-assisted surgery in our facility between Janu- ary and October 2014 were retrospectively studied. Tooth mobility was evaluated using the Miller index.

Results: Among the 76 (46 males and 30 females) patients aged 36 to 88 (mean: 67.8), mobile teeth were identified on dental consultation in 13 and reported during preoperative visits by 8.

Conclusions: Based on this findings, it may be nec- essary to pay sufficient attention when inserting tubes even when mobile teeth have not been reported by patients during preoperative visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信