爱沙尼亚:卫生系统审查。

Q1 Medicine
Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2018-03-01
Triin Habicht, Marge Reinap, Kaija Kasekamp, Riina Sikkut, Laura Aaben, Ewout van Ginneken
{"title":"爱沙尼亚:卫生系统审查。","authors":"Triin Habicht,&nbsp;Marge Reinap,&nbsp;Kaija Kasekamp,&nbsp;Riina Sikkut,&nbsp;Laura Aaben,&nbsp;Ewout van Ginneken","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of the Estonian health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. In 2017, the Estonian government took the historic step of expanding the revenue base of the health system, which has been a longstanding challenge. However, in terms of percentage of GDP it remains a small increase and long-term financial sustainability could still pose a problem. That said, if these additional funds are invested wisely, they could play a positive role in further improving the health system. Indeed, although Estonia has made remarkable progress on many health indicators (e.g. the strongest gains in life expectancy of all EU countries, strongly falling amenable mortality rates), there are opportunities for improvements. They include overcoming the large health disparities between socioeconomic groups, improving population coverage, developing a comprehensive plan to tackle workforce shortages, better managing the growing number of people with (multiple) noncommunicable diseases and further reaping the benefits of the e-health system, especially for care integration and clinical decision-making. Also in terms of quality, large strides have been made but the picture is mixed. Avoidable hospital admissions are among the lowest in Europe for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), about average for congestive heart failure and diabetes, but among the worst for hypertension. Moreover, the 30-day fatality rates for acute myocardial infarction and stroke are among the worst in the EU. These outcomes suggest substantial room to further improve service quality and care coordination. The new NHP, which is currently being revised will be play a crucial role in the success of future reform efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estonia: Health System Review.\",\"authors\":\"Triin Habicht,&nbsp;Marge Reinap,&nbsp;Kaija Kasekamp,&nbsp;Riina Sikkut,&nbsp;Laura Aaben,&nbsp;Ewout van Ginneken\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This analysis of the Estonian health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. In 2017, the Estonian government took the historic step of expanding the revenue base of the health system, which has been a longstanding challenge. However, in terms of percentage of GDP it remains a small increase and long-term financial sustainability could still pose a problem. That said, if these additional funds are invested wisely, they could play a positive role in further improving the health system. Indeed, although Estonia has made remarkable progress on many health indicators (e.g. the strongest gains in life expectancy of all EU countries, strongly falling amenable mortality rates), there are opportunities for improvements. They include overcoming the large health disparities between socioeconomic groups, improving population coverage, developing a comprehensive plan to tackle workforce shortages, better managing the growing number of people with (multiple) noncommunicable diseases and further reaping the benefits of the e-health system, especially for care integration and clinical decision-making. Also in terms of quality, large strides have been made but the picture is mixed. Avoidable hospital admissions are among the lowest in Europe for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), about average for congestive heart failure and diabetes, but among the worst for hypertension. Moreover, the 30-day fatality rates for acute myocardial infarction and stroke are among the worst in the EU. These outcomes suggest substantial room to further improve service quality and care coordination. The new NHP, which is currently being revised will be play a crucial role in the success of future reform efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health systems in transition\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"1-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health systems in transition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对爱沙尼亚卫生系统的分析回顾了组织和治理、卫生筹资、卫生保健提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效方面的最新发展。2017年,爱沙尼亚政府迈出了历史性的一步,扩大了卫生系统的收入基础,这是一个长期存在的挑战。然而,就占国内生产总值的百分比而言,这仍然是一个很小的增长,长期的财政可持续性仍可能构成问题。也就是说,如果这些额外资金得到明智的投资,它们可以在进一步改善卫生系统方面发挥积极作用。的确,尽管爱沙尼亚在许多健康指标上取得了显著进展(例如,预期寿命增长在所有欧盟国家中最为显著,可调整死亡率大幅下降),但仍有改进的机会。它们包括克服社会经济群体之间的巨大健康差距,改善人口覆盖率,制定解决劳动力短缺问题的综合计划,更好地管理越来越多的(多种)非传染性疾病患者,并进一步获得电子卫生系统的好处,特别是在护理整合和临床决策方面。同样在质量方面,已经取得了很大的进步,但情况好坏参半。在欧洲,哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的可避免住院率最低,充血性心力衰竭和糖尿病的可避免住院率约为平均水平,但高血压的可避免住院率最高。此外,急性心肌梗塞和中风的30天死亡率在欧盟是最差的。这些结果表明,进一步提高服务质量和护理协调的空间很大。目前正在修订的新的国家卫生规划将对今后改革努力的成功发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estonia: Health System Review.

This analysis of the Estonian health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. In 2017, the Estonian government took the historic step of expanding the revenue base of the health system, which has been a longstanding challenge. However, in terms of percentage of GDP it remains a small increase and long-term financial sustainability could still pose a problem. That said, if these additional funds are invested wisely, they could play a positive role in further improving the health system. Indeed, although Estonia has made remarkable progress on many health indicators (e.g. the strongest gains in life expectancy of all EU countries, strongly falling amenable mortality rates), there are opportunities for improvements. They include overcoming the large health disparities between socioeconomic groups, improving population coverage, developing a comprehensive plan to tackle workforce shortages, better managing the growing number of people with (multiple) noncommunicable diseases and further reaping the benefits of the e-health system, especially for care integration and clinical decision-making. Also in terms of quality, large strides have been made but the picture is mixed. Avoidable hospital admissions are among the lowest in Europe for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), about average for congestive heart failure and diabetes, but among the worst for hypertension. Moreover, the 30-day fatality rates for acute myocardial infarction and stroke are among the worst in the EU. These outcomes suggest substantial room to further improve service quality and care coordination. The new NHP, which is currently being revised will be play a crucial role in the success of future reform efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信