对不良事件的恐惧不应阻止适当使用降压药治疗

Q1 Medicine
William J. Kostis PhD, MD , Javier Cabrera PhD
{"title":"对不良事件的恐惧不应阻止适当使用降压药治疗","authors":"William J. Kostis PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Javier Cabrera PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A recent publication reported that Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial participants with 10-year cardiovascular disease risk less than 11.5% derived more harm than benefit from intensive treatment. The authors consider that serious adverse events (SAEs) are of equal importance to that of either all-cause death or the primary composite outcome (myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes). Under this premise, one death would correspond to 2.7 SAEs and a primary outcome to 1.8 SAEs overall, and to be between 6 and 18 times as important as an SAE in the intensive treatment group. In our opinion, patient utility should be considered when clinical decisions are made for the treatment of hypertension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.09.002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fear of adverse events should not prevent the use of appropriate antihypertensive drug therapy\",\"authors\":\"William J. Kostis PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Javier Cabrera PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jash.2018.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A recent publication reported that Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial participants with 10-year cardiovascular disease risk less than 11.5% derived more harm than benefit from intensive treatment. The authors consider that serious adverse events (SAEs) are of equal importance to that of either all-cause death or the primary composite outcome (myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes). Under this premise, one death would correspond to 2.7 SAEs and a primary outcome to 1.8 SAEs overall, and to be between 6 and 18 times as important as an SAE in the intensive treatment group. In our opinion, patient utility should be considered when clinical decisions are made for the treatment of hypertension.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.09.002\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118302742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118302742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近的一份出版物报道,收缩压干预试验参与者10年心血管疾病风险低于11.5%,强化治疗的危害大于益处。作者认为严重不良事件(SAEs)与全因死亡或主要复合结局(心肌梗死、其他急性冠状动脉综合征、中风、心力衰竭或心血管原因死亡)同等重要。在此前提下,1例死亡对应2.7例急性呼吸道感染,主要结局对应1.8例急性呼吸道感染,在强化治疗组中,其重要性是急性呼吸道感染的6 - 18倍。在我们看来,在临床决定治疗高血压时应考虑患者的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fear of adverse events should not prevent the use of appropriate antihypertensive drug therapy

A recent publication reported that Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial participants with 10-year cardiovascular disease risk less than 11.5% derived more harm than benefit from intensive treatment. The authors consider that serious adverse events (SAEs) are of equal importance to that of either all-cause death or the primary composite outcome (myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes). Under this premise, one death would correspond to 2.7 SAEs and a primary outcome to 1.8 SAEs overall, and to be between 6 and 18 times as important as an SAE in the intensive treatment group. In our opinion, patient utility should be considered when clinical decisions are made for the treatment of hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信