肥胖与机械通气脱机的探索性研究。

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Ogugua Ndili Obi, Mark Mazer, Charles Bangley, Zuheir Kassabo, Khalid Saadah, Wayne Trainor, Kenneth Stephens, Patricia L Rice, Robert Shaw
{"title":"肥胖与机械通气脱机的探索性研究。","authors":"Ogugua Ndili Obi,&nbsp;Mark Mazer,&nbsp;Charles Bangley,&nbsp;Zuheir Kassabo,&nbsp;Khalid Saadah,&nbsp;Wayne Trainor,&nbsp;Kenneth Stephens,&nbsp;Patricia L Rice,&nbsp;Robert Shaw","doi":"10.1177/1179548418801004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obesity is associated with increased risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure, prolonged duration on mechanical ventilation, and extended weaning periods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pilot study to determine whether morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (body mass index [BMI] ⩾ 40) can be more efficiently weaned from the ventilator by optimizing their positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using either an esophageal balloon or the best achieved static effective compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 25 morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (median [interquartile range] BMI 53.4 [26.4]; range 40.4-113.8) to 1 of 2 methods of setting PEEP; using either titration guided by esophageal balloon to overcome negative transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) (goal Ptp 0-5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) (ESO group) or titration to maximize static effective lung compliance (Cstat group). Our outcomes of interest were number of subjects weaned by day 30 and time to wean.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At day 30, there was no significant difference in percentage of subjects weaned. 8/13 subjects (62%) in the ESO Group were weaned vs. 9/12(75%) in the Cstat Group (<i>P</i> = 0.67). Among the 17 subjects who weaned, median time to ventilator liberation was significantly shorter in the ESO group: 3.5 days vs Cstat group 14 days (<i>P</i> = .01). Optimal PEEP in the ESO and Cstat groups was similar (ESO mean ± SD = 26.5 ± 5.7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and Cstat 24.2 ± 7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (<i>P</i> = .38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimization of PEEP using esophageal balloon to achieve positive transpulmonary pressure did not change the proportion of patients weaned. Among patients who weaned, use of the esophageal balloon resulted in faster liberation from mechanical ventilation. There were no adverse consequences of the high PEEP (mean 25.4; range 13-37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) used in our study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution (UMCIRB#10-0343) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02323009).</p>","PeriodicalId":44269,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1179548418801004"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179548418801004","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ogugua Ndili Obi,&nbsp;Mark Mazer,&nbsp;Charles Bangley,&nbsp;Zuheir Kassabo,&nbsp;Khalid Saadah,&nbsp;Wayne Trainor,&nbsp;Kenneth Stephens,&nbsp;Patricia L Rice,&nbsp;Robert Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179548418801004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obesity is associated with increased risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure, prolonged duration on mechanical ventilation, and extended weaning periods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pilot study to determine whether morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (body mass index [BMI] ⩾ 40) can be more efficiently weaned from the ventilator by optimizing their positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using either an esophageal balloon or the best achieved static effective compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 25 morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (median [interquartile range] BMI 53.4 [26.4]; range 40.4-113.8) to 1 of 2 methods of setting PEEP; using either titration guided by esophageal balloon to overcome negative transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) (goal Ptp 0-5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) (ESO group) or titration to maximize static effective lung compliance (Cstat group). Our outcomes of interest were number of subjects weaned by day 30 and time to wean.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At day 30, there was no significant difference in percentage of subjects weaned. 8/13 subjects (62%) in the ESO Group were weaned vs. 9/12(75%) in the Cstat Group (<i>P</i> = 0.67). Among the 17 subjects who weaned, median time to ventilator liberation was significantly shorter in the ESO group: 3.5 days vs Cstat group 14 days (<i>P</i> = .01). Optimal PEEP in the ESO and Cstat groups was similar (ESO mean ± SD = 26.5 ± 5.7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and Cstat 24.2 ± 7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (<i>P</i> = .38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimization of PEEP using esophageal balloon to achieve positive transpulmonary pressure did not change the proportion of patients weaned. Among patients who weaned, use of the esophageal balloon resulted in faster liberation from mechanical ventilation. There were no adverse consequences of the high PEEP (mean 25.4; range 13-37 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) used in our study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution (UMCIRB#10-0343) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02323009).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1179548418801004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179548418801004\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548418801004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548418801004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

肥胖与高碳酸血症性呼吸衰竭的风险增加、机械通气时间延长和脱机时间延长有关。目的:初步研究确定病态肥胖成人气管切开术受试者(体重指数[BMI]大于或等于40)是否可以通过使用食管球囊或最佳实现的静态有效依从性优化其呼气末正压(PEEP)来更有效地脱离呼吸机。方法:我们随机分配25名病态肥胖成人气管切开术受试者(中位数[四分位数间距]BMI为53.4 [26.4];范围40.4-113.8)至2种设置PEEP方法中的一种;使用食管球囊引导下的滴定来克服负肺压(Ptp)(目标Ptp 0-5 cmH2O) (ESO组)或滴定以最大化静态有效肺顺应性(Cstat组)。我们感兴趣的结果是在第30天断奶的受试者数量和断奶时间。结果:在第30天,断奶的受试者百分比无显著差异。ESO组有8/13例(62%)断奶,而Cstat组有9/12例(75%)断奶(P = 0.67)。在17名受试者中,ESO组的中位呼吸机解放时间显著缩短:3.5天,而Cstat组为14天(P = 0.01)。ESO组和Cstat组的最佳PEEP相似(ESO平均值±SD = 26.5±5.7 cmH2O, Cstat为24.2±7 cmH2O (P = 0.38)。结论:优化食管球囊实现正肺压的PEEP并没有改变断奶患者的比例。在断奶的患者中,使用食管球囊可以更快地从机械通气中解脱出来。高PEEP无不良后果(平均25.4;范围13-37 cmH2O)在我们的研究中使用。该研究获得了我们机构审查委员会(UMCIRB#10-0343)的批准,并在clinicaltrials.gov上注册(NCT02323009)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study.

Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study.

Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study.

Obesity and Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation-An Exploratory Study.

Introduction: Obesity is associated with increased risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure, prolonged duration on mechanical ventilation, and extended weaning periods.

Objective: Pilot study to determine whether morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (body mass index [BMI] ⩾ 40) can be more efficiently weaned from the ventilator by optimizing their positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using either an esophageal balloon or the best achieved static effective compliance.

Methods: We randomly assigned 25 morbidly obese adult tracheotomized subjects (median [interquartile range] BMI 53.4 [26.4]; range 40.4-113.8) to 1 of 2 methods of setting PEEP; using either titration guided by esophageal balloon to overcome negative transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) (goal Ptp 0-5 cmH2O) (ESO group) or titration to maximize static effective lung compliance (Cstat group). Our outcomes of interest were number of subjects weaned by day 30 and time to wean.

Results: At day 30, there was no significant difference in percentage of subjects weaned. 8/13 subjects (62%) in the ESO Group were weaned vs. 9/12(75%) in the Cstat Group (P = 0.67). Among the 17 subjects who weaned, median time to ventilator liberation was significantly shorter in the ESO group: 3.5 days vs Cstat group 14 days (P = .01). Optimal PEEP in the ESO and Cstat groups was similar (ESO mean ± SD = 26.5 ± 5.7 cmH2O and Cstat 24.2 ± 7 cmH2O (P = .38).

Conclusions: Optimization of PEEP using esophageal balloon to achieve positive transpulmonary pressure did not change the proportion of patients weaned. Among patients who weaned, use of the esophageal balloon resulted in faster liberation from mechanical ventilation. There were no adverse consequences of the high PEEP (mean 25.4; range 13-37 cmH2O) used in our study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution (UMCIRB#10-0343) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02323009).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信