可穿戴传感和移动设备:脑震荡后监测的未来?

Q3 Medicine
Concussion Pub Date : 2017-02-08 eCollection Date: 2017-03-01 DOI:10.2217/cnc-2016-0025
William Johnston, Cailbhe Doherty, Fionn Cleirigh Büttner, Brian Caulfield
{"title":"可穿戴传感和移动设备:脑震荡后监测的未来?","authors":"William Johnston, Cailbhe Doherty, Fionn Cleirigh Büttner, Brian Caulfield","doi":"10.2217/cnc-2016-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, concussion has received large amounts of attention in public, medical and research circles. While our understanding of the nature and management of concussion has greatly improved, there are still major limitations which need to be addressed surrounding the identification of the injury, determining when an individual is safe to return to normal activity, and what factors may contribute to the development of post-concussion syndrome (PCS). The current model of concussion management involves a triage evaluation in the acute stage of injury, focusing on the classic signs and symptoms of concussion. Next, the clinician attempts to evaluate key components of cerebral function through clinical symptom evaluation, and traditional assessments of motor and neurocognitive function [1]. The development of the sports concussion assessment tool saw a massive leap forward in the strategies employed in the management of concussion, as it acknowledged the multifactorial nature of concussion, and provided a standardized means for clinicians to assess the many domains of cerebral function [2]. While these methods have demonstrated some promise in the acute stage, they are not designed for serial monitoring (particularly in instances where PCS develops) [3], and provide us with very little clinically relevant information that can assist clinicians in the return to learn/sport/performance process. The traditional model of concussion assessment coincides with a graduated return-to-play protocol. This protocol is simply dictated by the length of time since the injury, and symptom resolution with physiological exertion [4]; it does not reflect the athlete’s true readiness to return to sport, as determined by a multi-modal objective assessment of the variety of impairments that manifest following concussion or during PCS. Indeed, this methodology is fraught with a number of key limitations: these assessments represent the individual’s status at discrete points in time, are focused on quantifying parameters that are subject to a level of hourly and daily variability independent of the concussive injury, and do not acknowledge the heterogeneous and evolving nature of the injury. In addition, while we know that concussion affects short-term physical (such as balance and gait) and cognitive (such as memory and concentration) competencies, the evolving nature of PCS for these competencies is not well understood. There is a dearth of evidence quantifying exactly how an injury such as concussion, with widespread symptomatology, disturbs an individual’s capacity for physical activity. Improving the evidence base in these areas is vital considering recent evidence which has suggested that concussion has long term effects on physical competencies, with increased musculoskeletal injury rates being observed for 3/12 months’ post injury [5–7]. Furthermore, concern has been raised as to the long term effects of repeated concussions on cognitive Wearable sensing and mobile devices: the future of post-concussion monitoring?","PeriodicalId":37006,"journal":{"name":"Concussion","volume":"2 1","pages":"CNC28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/cnc-2016-0025","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wearable sensing and mobile devices: the future of post-concussion monitoring?\",\"authors\":\"William Johnston, Cailbhe Doherty, Fionn Cleirigh Büttner, Brian Caulfield\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/cnc-2016-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past decade, concussion has received large amounts of attention in public, medical and research circles. While our understanding of the nature and management of concussion has greatly improved, there are still major limitations which need to be addressed surrounding the identification of the injury, determining when an individual is safe to return to normal activity, and what factors may contribute to the development of post-concussion syndrome (PCS). The current model of concussion management involves a triage evaluation in the acute stage of injury, focusing on the classic signs and symptoms of concussion. Next, the clinician attempts to evaluate key components of cerebral function through clinical symptom evaluation, and traditional assessments of motor and neurocognitive function [1]. The development of the sports concussion assessment tool saw a massive leap forward in the strategies employed in the management of concussion, as it acknowledged the multifactorial nature of concussion, and provided a standardized means for clinicians to assess the many domains of cerebral function [2]. While these methods have demonstrated some promise in the acute stage, they are not designed for serial monitoring (particularly in instances where PCS develops) [3], and provide us with very little clinically relevant information that can assist clinicians in the return to learn/sport/performance process. The traditional model of concussion assessment coincides with a graduated return-to-play protocol. This protocol is simply dictated by the length of time since the injury, and symptom resolution with physiological exertion [4]; it does not reflect the athlete’s true readiness to return to sport, as determined by a multi-modal objective assessment of the variety of impairments that manifest following concussion or during PCS. Indeed, this methodology is fraught with a number of key limitations: these assessments represent the individual’s status at discrete points in time, are focused on quantifying parameters that are subject to a level of hourly and daily variability independent of the concussive injury, and do not acknowledge the heterogeneous and evolving nature of the injury. In addition, while we know that concussion affects short-term physical (such as balance and gait) and cognitive (such as memory and concentration) competencies, the evolving nature of PCS for these competencies is not well understood. There is a dearth of evidence quantifying exactly how an injury such as concussion, with widespread symptomatology, disturbs an individual’s capacity for physical activity. Improving the evidence base in these areas is vital considering recent evidence which has suggested that concussion has long term effects on physical competencies, with increased musculoskeletal injury rates being observed for 3/12 months’ post injury [5–7]. Furthermore, concern has been raised as to the long term effects of repeated concussions on cognitive Wearable sensing and mobile devices: the future of post-concussion monitoring?\",\"PeriodicalId\":37006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concussion\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"CNC28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/cnc-2016-0025\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concussion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2016-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2016-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wearable sensing and mobile devices: the future of post-concussion monitoring?
In the past decade, concussion has received large amounts of attention in public, medical and research circles. While our understanding of the nature and management of concussion has greatly improved, there are still major limitations which need to be addressed surrounding the identification of the injury, determining when an individual is safe to return to normal activity, and what factors may contribute to the development of post-concussion syndrome (PCS). The current model of concussion management involves a triage evaluation in the acute stage of injury, focusing on the classic signs and symptoms of concussion. Next, the clinician attempts to evaluate key components of cerebral function through clinical symptom evaluation, and traditional assessments of motor and neurocognitive function [1]. The development of the sports concussion assessment tool saw a massive leap forward in the strategies employed in the management of concussion, as it acknowledged the multifactorial nature of concussion, and provided a standardized means for clinicians to assess the many domains of cerebral function [2]. While these methods have demonstrated some promise in the acute stage, they are not designed for serial monitoring (particularly in instances where PCS develops) [3], and provide us with very little clinically relevant information that can assist clinicians in the return to learn/sport/performance process. The traditional model of concussion assessment coincides with a graduated return-to-play protocol. This protocol is simply dictated by the length of time since the injury, and symptom resolution with physiological exertion [4]; it does not reflect the athlete’s true readiness to return to sport, as determined by a multi-modal objective assessment of the variety of impairments that manifest following concussion or during PCS. Indeed, this methodology is fraught with a number of key limitations: these assessments represent the individual’s status at discrete points in time, are focused on quantifying parameters that are subject to a level of hourly and daily variability independent of the concussive injury, and do not acknowledge the heterogeneous and evolving nature of the injury. In addition, while we know that concussion affects short-term physical (such as balance and gait) and cognitive (such as memory and concentration) competencies, the evolving nature of PCS for these competencies is not well understood. There is a dearth of evidence quantifying exactly how an injury such as concussion, with widespread symptomatology, disturbs an individual’s capacity for physical activity. Improving the evidence base in these areas is vital considering recent evidence which has suggested that concussion has long term effects on physical competencies, with increased musculoskeletal injury rates being observed for 3/12 months’ post injury [5–7]. Furthermore, concern has been raised as to the long term effects of repeated concussions on cognitive Wearable sensing and mobile devices: the future of post-concussion monitoring?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Concussion
Concussion Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信