在线门户网站中以患者为中心的测试结果显示界面设计方法。

Daniel T Nystrom, Hardeep Singh, Jessica Baldwin, Dean F Sittig, Traber D Giardina
{"title":"在线门户网站中以患者为中心的测试结果显示界面设计方法。","authors":"Daniel T Nystrom,&nbsp;Hardeep Singh,&nbsp;Jessica Baldwin,&nbsp;Dean F Sittig,&nbsp;Traber D Giardina","doi":"10.5334/egems.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients have unique information needs to help them interpret and make decisions about laboratory test results they receive on web-based portals. However, current portals are not designed in a patient-centered way and little is known on how best to harness patients' information needs to inform user-centered interface design of portals. We designed a patient-facing laboratory test result interface prototype based on requirement elicitation research and used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate this interface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After designing an initial test result display prototype, we used multiple evaluation methods, including focus group review sessions, expert consultation, and user testing, to make iterative design changes. For the user testing component, we recruited 14 patient-users to collect and analyze three types of data: comments made during testing sessions, responses to post-session questionnaires, and system usability scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our initial patient-centered interface design included visual ranges of laboratory values, nontechnical descriptions of the test and result, and access to features to help patients interpret and make decisions about their results. Findings from our evaluation resulted in 6 design iterations of the interface. Results from user testing indicate that the later versions of the interface fulfilled patient's information needs, were perceived as usable, and provided access to information and techniques that facilitated patient's ability to derive meaning from each test result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Requirement elicitation studies can inform the design of a patient-facing test result interface, but considerable user-centered design efforts are necessary to create an interface that patients find useful. To promote patient engagement, health information technology designers and developers can use similar approaches to enhance user-centered software design in patient portals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078112/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel T Nystrom,&nbsp;Hardeep Singh,&nbsp;Jessica Baldwin,&nbsp;Dean F Sittig,&nbsp;Traber D Giardina\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/egems.255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients have unique information needs to help them interpret and make decisions about laboratory test results they receive on web-based portals. However, current portals are not designed in a patient-centered way and little is known on how best to harness patients' information needs to inform user-centered interface design of portals. We designed a patient-facing laboratory test result interface prototype based on requirement elicitation research and used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate this interface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After designing an initial test result display prototype, we used multiple evaluation methods, including focus group review sessions, expert consultation, and user testing, to make iterative design changes. For the user testing component, we recruited 14 patient-users to collect and analyze three types of data: comments made during testing sessions, responses to post-session questionnaires, and system usability scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our initial patient-centered interface design included visual ranges of laboratory values, nontechnical descriptions of the test and result, and access to features to help patients interpret and make decisions about their results. Findings from our evaluation resulted in 6 design iterations of the interface. Results from user testing indicate that the later versions of the interface fulfilled patient's information needs, were perceived as usable, and provided access to information and techniques that facilitated patient's ability to derive meaning from each test result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Requirement elicitation studies can inform the design of a patient-facing test result interface, but considerable user-centered design efforts are necessary to create an interface that patients find useful. To promote patient engagement, health information technology designers and developers can use similar approaches to enhance user-centered software design in patient portals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EGEMS (Washington, DC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EGEMS (Washington, DC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

目的:患者有独特的信息需求,以帮助他们解释和决定他们在网络门户网站上收到的实验室检测结果。然而,目前的门户网站并不是以患者为中心的方式设计的,而且对于如何最好地利用患者的信息需求来为门户网站的以用户为中心的界面设计提供信息知之甚少。基于需求启发研究,设计了面向患者的实验室测试结果界面原型,并采用混合方法对该界面进行评估。方法:在设计初始测试结果显示原型后,我们使用多种评估方法,包括焦点小组评审会议,专家咨询和用户测试,进行迭代设计更改。对于用户测试组件,我们招募了14名患者用户来收集和分析三种类型的数据:测试期间的评论,对会话后问卷的回应,以及系统可用性分数。结果:我们最初以患者为中心的界面设计包括实验室值的视觉范围,测试和结果的非技术描述,以及帮助患者解释和决定结果的功能访问。我们的评估结果导致了6次界面设计迭代。用户测试的结果表明,后期版本的界面满足了患者的信息需求,被认为是可用的,并提供了访问信息和技术的途径,促进了患者从每个测试结果中获得意义的能力。结论:需求启发研究可以为面向患者的测试结果界面的设计提供信息,但要创建一个患者觉得有用的界面,需要大量以用户为中心的设计工作。为了促进患者参与,卫生信息技术设计人员和开发人员可以使用类似的方法在患者门户中增强以用户为中心的软件设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals.

Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals.

Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals.

Objectives: Patients have unique information needs to help them interpret and make decisions about laboratory test results they receive on web-based portals. However, current portals are not designed in a patient-centered way and little is known on how best to harness patients' information needs to inform user-centered interface design of portals. We designed a patient-facing laboratory test result interface prototype based on requirement elicitation research and used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate this interface.

Methods: After designing an initial test result display prototype, we used multiple evaluation methods, including focus group review sessions, expert consultation, and user testing, to make iterative design changes. For the user testing component, we recruited 14 patient-users to collect and analyze three types of data: comments made during testing sessions, responses to post-session questionnaires, and system usability scores.

Results: Our initial patient-centered interface design included visual ranges of laboratory values, nontechnical descriptions of the test and result, and access to features to help patients interpret and make decisions about their results. Findings from our evaluation resulted in 6 design iterations of the interface. Results from user testing indicate that the later versions of the interface fulfilled patient's information needs, were perceived as usable, and provided access to information and techniques that facilitated patient's ability to derive meaning from each test result.

Conclusions: Requirement elicitation studies can inform the design of a patient-facing test result interface, but considerable user-centered design efforts are necessary to create an interface that patients find useful. To promote patient engagement, health information technology designers and developers can use similar approaches to enhance user-centered software design in patient portals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信