Kirtie Ramdas, Charlotte van Lee, Samuel Beck, Patrick Bindels, Vincent Noordhoek Hegt, Luba Pardo, Sarah Versnel, Tamar Nijsten, Renate van den Bos
{"title":"皮肤科医生、整形外科医生和全科医生对基底细胞癌完全切除率的差异:一项大型横断面研究。","authors":"Kirtie Ramdas, Charlotte van Lee, Samuel Beck, Patrick Bindels, Vincent Noordhoek Hegt, Luba Pardo, Sarah Versnel, Tamar Nijsten, Renate van den Bos","doi":"10.1159/000490344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the increasing incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and rising health care costs, health care insurance companies seek ways to shift skin surgery for BCC from secondary to primary care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the differences in complete excision of BCC by general practitioners (GPs), dermatologists, and plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of pathology records of 2,986 standard excisions of primary BCCs performed by a GP, dermatologist, or plastic surgeon in the area of Southwest Netherlands between 2008 and 2014. To compare the risk of an incomplete BCC excision between the specialties, the odds ratio (OR) was used adjusted for patient age, sex, tumor site, size, and histological subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCCs were completely excised by GPs in 70%, which was lower than the 93% by dermatologists and 83% by plastic surgeons (p < 0.001). Compared to the dermatologist, BCCs which were excised by a GP were 6 times higher at risk of an incomplete excision (adjusted OR 6, 95% CI 5-8) and 2 times higher at risk when excised by a plastic surgeon (adjusted OR 2, 95% CI 2-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCCs were more often completely excised by dermatologists than by GPs and plastic surgeons. Dermatologists probably perform better because of their extensive training and high experience in BCC care. To minimize incomplete BCC excision, GPs should receive specific training before the shift of BCC care from secondary to primary care is justifiable.</p>","PeriodicalId":144585,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"86-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490344","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Rate of Complete Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists, Plastic Surgeons and General Practitioners: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirtie Ramdas, Charlotte van Lee, Samuel Beck, Patrick Bindels, Vincent Noordhoek Hegt, Luba Pardo, Sarah Versnel, Tamar Nijsten, Renate van den Bos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000490344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the increasing incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and rising health care costs, health care insurance companies seek ways to shift skin surgery for BCC from secondary to primary care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the differences in complete excision of BCC by general practitioners (GPs), dermatologists, and plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study of pathology records of 2,986 standard excisions of primary BCCs performed by a GP, dermatologist, or plastic surgeon in the area of Southwest Netherlands between 2008 and 2014. To compare the risk of an incomplete BCC excision between the specialties, the odds ratio (OR) was used adjusted for patient age, sex, tumor site, size, and histological subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCCs were completely excised by GPs in 70%, which was lower than the 93% by dermatologists and 83% by plastic surgeons (p < 0.001). Compared to the dermatologist, BCCs which were excised by a GP were 6 times higher at risk of an incomplete excision (adjusted OR 6, 95% CI 5-8) and 2 times higher at risk when excised by a plastic surgeon (adjusted OR 2, 95% CI 2-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BCCs were more often completely excised by dermatologists than by GPs and plastic surgeons. Dermatologists probably perform better because of their extensive training and high experience in BCC care. To minimize incomplete BCC excision, GPs should receive specific training before the shift of BCC care from secondary to primary care is justifiable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":144585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"86-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490344\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33
摘要
背景:由于基底细胞癌(BCC)发病率的增加和医疗费用的上升,医疗保险公司寻求将基底细胞癌的皮肤手术从次要医疗转移到初级医疗的方法。目的:研究全科医生(gp)、皮肤科医生和整形外科医生在完全切除BCC方面的差异。方法:回顾性横断面研究2008年至2014年荷兰西南部地区由全科医生、皮肤科医生或整形外科医生进行的2986例原发性bcc标准切除的病理记录。为了比较不同专科间不完全基底细胞癌切除术的风险,采用优势比(OR),根据患者年龄、性别、肿瘤部位、大小和组织学亚型进行调整。结果:全科医生完全切除bcc的比例为70%,低于皮肤科医生的93%和整形外科医生的83% (p < 0.001)。与皮肤科医生相比,全科医生切除的bcc不完全切除的风险高6倍(调整后的OR 6, 95% CI 5-8),整形外科医生切除的风险高2倍(调整后的OR 2, 95% CI 2-3)。结论:皮肤科医生比全科医生和整形外科医生更容易完全切除bcc。皮肤科医生可能表现得更好,因为他们在BCC护理方面受过广泛的培训和丰富的经验。为了尽量减少不完整的基底细胞癌切除,全科医生应接受专门的培训,然后才将基底细胞癌护理从二级转移到初级护理是合理的。
Differences in Rate of Complete Excision of Basal Cell Carcinoma by Dermatologists, Plastic Surgeons and General Practitioners: A Large Cross-Sectional Study.
Background: Due to the increasing incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and rising health care costs, health care insurance companies seek ways to shift skin surgery for BCC from secondary to primary care.
Objectives: To study the differences in complete excision of BCC by general practitioners (GPs), dermatologists, and plastic surgeons.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of pathology records of 2,986 standard excisions of primary BCCs performed by a GP, dermatologist, or plastic surgeon in the area of Southwest Netherlands between 2008 and 2014. To compare the risk of an incomplete BCC excision between the specialties, the odds ratio (OR) was used adjusted for patient age, sex, tumor site, size, and histological subtype.
Results: BCCs were completely excised by GPs in 70%, which was lower than the 93% by dermatologists and 83% by plastic surgeons (p < 0.001). Compared to the dermatologist, BCCs which were excised by a GP were 6 times higher at risk of an incomplete excision (adjusted OR 6, 95% CI 5-8) and 2 times higher at risk when excised by a plastic surgeon (adjusted OR 2, 95% CI 2-3).
Conclusion: BCCs were more often completely excised by dermatologists than by GPs and plastic surgeons. Dermatologists probably perform better because of their extensive training and high experience in BCC care. To minimize incomplete BCC excision, GPs should receive specific training before the shift of BCC care from secondary to primary care is justifiable.