成人囊性纤维化的运动脑卒中量:乙炔肺摄取和氧脉冲的比较。

IF 1 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Erik H Van Iterson, Sarah E Baker, Courtney M Wheatley, Wayne J Morgan, Thomas P Olson, Eric M Snyder
{"title":"成人囊性纤维化的运动脑卒中量:乙炔肺摄取和氧脉冲的比较。","authors":"Erik H Van Iterson,&nbsp;Sarah E Baker,&nbsp;Courtney M Wheatley,&nbsp;Wayne J Morgan,&nbsp;Thomas P Olson,&nbsp;Eric M Snyder","doi":"10.1177/1179548418790564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac hemodynamic assessment during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is proposed to play an important role in the clinical evaluation of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). Cardiac catheterization is not practical for routine clinical CPET. Use of oxygen pulse (O<sub>2</sub>pulse) as a noninvasive estimate of stroke volume (SV) has not been validated in CF. This study tested the hypothesis that peak exercise O<sub>2</sub>pulse is a valid estimate of SV in CF. Measurements of SV via the acetylene rebreathe technique were acquired at baseline and peak exercise in 17 mild-to-moderate severity adult CF and 25 age-matched healthy adults. We calculated <math><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mi>p</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>l</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>.</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>H</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></math> . Baseline relationships between SV and O<sub>2</sub>pulse were significant in CF (<i>r</i> = .80) and controls (<i>r</i> = .40), persisting to peak exercise in CF (<i>r</i> = .63) and controls (<i>r</i> = .73). The standard error of estimate for O<sub>2</sub>pulse-predicted SV with respect to measured SV was similar at baseline (14.1 vs 20.1 mL) and peak exercise (18.2 vs 13.9 mL) for CF and controls, respectively. These data suggest that peak exercise O<sub>2</sub>pulse is a valid estimate of SV in CF. The ability to noninvasively estimate SV via O<sub>2</sub>pulse during routine clinical CPET can be used to improve test interpretation and advance our understanding of the impact cardiac dysfunction has on exercise intolerance in CF.</p>","PeriodicalId":44269,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1179548418790564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179548418790564","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise Stroke Volume in Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Comparison of Acetylene Pulmonary Uptake and Oxygen Pulse.\",\"authors\":\"Erik H Van Iterson,&nbsp;Sarah E Baker,&nbsp;Courtney M Wheatley,&nbsp;Wayne J Morgan,&nbsp;Thomas P Olson,&nbsp;Eric M Snyder\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179548418790564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiac hemodynamic assessment during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is proposed to play an important role in the clinical evaluation of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). Cardiac catheterization is not practical for routine clinical CPET. Use of oxygen pulse (O<sub>2</sub>pulse) as a noninvasive estimate of stroke volume (SV) has not been validated in CF. This study tested the hypothesis that peak exercise O<sub>2</sub>pulse is a valid estimate of SV in CF. Measurements of SV via the acetylene rebreathe technique were acquired at baseline and peak exercise in 17 mild-to-moderate severity adult CF and 25 age-matched healthy adults. We calculated <math><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mi>p</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>l</mi><mi>s</mi><mi>e</mi><mo>=</mo><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>.</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>H</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></math> . Baseline relationships between SV and O<sub>2</sub>pulse were significant in CF (<i>r</i> = .80) and controls (<i>r</i> = .40), persisting to peak exercise in CF (<i>r</i> = .63) and controls (<i>r</i> = .73). The standard error of estimate for O<sub>2</sub>pulse-predicted SV with respect to measured SV was similar at baseline (14.1 vs 20.1 mL) and peak exercise (18.2 vs 13.9 mL) for CF and controls, respectively. These data suggest that peak exercise O<sub>2</sub>pulse is a valid estimate of SV in CF. The ability to noninvasively estimate SV via O<sub>2</sub>pulse during routine clinical CPET can be used to improve test interpretation and advance our understanding of the impact cardiac dysfunction has on exercise intolerance in CF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1179548418790564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179548418790564\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548418790564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Circulatory Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548418790564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

心肺运动试验(CPET)期间的心脏血流动力学评估在囊性纤维化(CF)患者的临床评估中发挥重要作用。心导管插入术在常规临床CPET中是不实用的。使用氧脉冲(o2脉冲)作为卒中容量(SV)的无创估计尚未在CF中得到验证。本研究验证了峰值运动o2脉冲是CF中SV的有效估计的假设。通过乙炔再呼吸技术在基线和峰值运动时获得了17名轻中度成人CF和25名年龄匹配的健康成人的SV测量。我们计算出O2pulse=V。O2HR。SV和O2pulse之间的基线关系在CF (r = 0.80)和对照组(r = 0.40)中具有显著性,在CF (r = 0.63)和对照组(r = 0.73)中持续达到运动峰值。在基线(14.1 mL vs 20.1 mL)和运动峰值(18.2 mL vs 13.9 mL)时,CF和对照组的o2pulse预测SV与测量SV的估计标准误差相似。这些数据表明,峰值运动o2脉冲是CF中SV的有效估计。常规临床CPET中通过o2脉冲无创估计SV的能力可用于改进测试解释,并促进我们对心功能障碍对CF中运动不耐受的影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exercise Stroke Volume in Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Comparison of Acetylene Pulmonary Uptake and Oxygen Pulse.

Exercise Stroke Volume in Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Comparison of Acetylene Pulmonary Uptake and Oxygen Pulse.

Exercise Stroke Volume in Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Comparison of Acetylene Pulmonary Uptake and Oxygen Pulse.

Exercise Stroke Volume in Adult Cystic Fibrosis: A Comparison of Acetylene Pulmonary Uptake and Oxygen Pulse.

Cardiac hemodynamic assessment during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is proposed to play an important role in the clinical evaluation of individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). Cardiac catheterization is not practical for routine clinical CPET. Use of oxygen pulse (O2pulse) as a noninvasive estimate of stroke volume (SV) has not been validated in CF. This study tested the hypothesis that peak exercise O2pulse is a valid estimate of SV in CF. Measurements of SV via the acetylene rebreathe technique were acquired at baseline and peak exercise in 17 mild-to-moderate severity adult CF and 25 age-matched healthy adults. We calculated O2pulse=V.O2HR . Baseline relationships between SV and O2pulse were significant in CF (r = .80) and controls (r = .40), persisting to peak exercise in CF (r = .63) and controls (r = .73). The standard error of estimate for O2pulse-predicted SV with respect to measured SV was similar at baseline (14.1 vs 20.1 mL) and peak exercise (18.2 vs 13.9 mL) for CF and controls, respectively. These data suggest that peak exercise O2pulse is a valid estimate of SV in CF. The ability to noninvasively estimate SV via O2pulse during routine clinical CPET can be used to improve test interpretation and advance our understanding of the impact cardiac dysfunction has on exercise intolerance in CF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信