父母对未来的关注和希望的表达及其对子女残疾的评估。

IF 1.7 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics Pub Date : 2018-06-27 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179556518784948
Niels Ove Illum, Mette Bonderup, Kim Oren Gradel
{"title":"父母对未来的关注和希望的表达及其对子女残疾的评估。","authors":"Niels Ove Illum,&nbsp;Mette Bonderup,&nbsp;Kim Oren Gradel","doi":"10.1177/1179556518784948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess parents' ability to express their concerns and hopes for the future in their children with disability and assess their children's disability as well as to analyse these data for consistency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Parents of 162 children with spina bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular disorders, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, hearing impairment, mental disability, or disability following brain tumours were asked to freely express their concerns and hopes for the future and to assess disability in their own children by employing a set of 26 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) body function (b) codes and activity and participation (d) codes. A grounded theory approach was employed to systematize parents' expressions of concerns and hopes; then, parents scored qualifiers on a 5-step qualitative Likert scale. Parents assessed their children's disability in the same way using the ICF-CY 5-step qualifier scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 119 parents freely expressed their concerns and hopes, and 101 of them also assessed their children's disability using the 26 ICF-CY codes. A total of 475 expressions of concern and hopes (issues) were expressed and categorized into 34 areas of concern and hopes (subsections). The most frequently mentioned issues were education; understanding, goodwill, and communication between parents; and community support. Qualitative data on both 5-step qualifier scales showed good reliability. Rasch analysis maps on concerns and hopes for children as well as on the ICF-CY assessment demonstrated good alignment and a clinically relevant progression from the least to the most disabled children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents can express valid and reliable data on their concerns and hopes for the future and can reliably assess disability in their own children.</p>","PeriodicalId":45027,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179556518784948","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parents' Expressions of Concerns and Hopes for the Future and Their Concomitant Assessments of Disability in Their Children.\",\"authors\":\"Niels Ove Illum,&nbsp;Mette Bonderup,&nbsp;Kim Oren Gradel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179556518784948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess parents' ability to express their concerns and hopes for the future in their children with disability and assess their children's disability as well as to analyse these data for consistency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Parents of 162 children with spina bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular disorders, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, hearing impairment, mental disability, or disability following brain tumours were asked to freely express their concerns and hopes for the future and to assess disability in their own children by employing a set of 26 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) body function (b) codes and activity and participation (d) codes. A grounded theory approach was employed to systematize parents' expressions of concerns and hopes; then, parents scored qualifiers on a 5-step qualitative Likert scale. Parents assessed their children's disability in the same way using the ICF-CY 5-step qualifier scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 119 parents freely expressed their concerns and hopes, and 101 of them also assessed their children's disability using the 26 ICF-CY codes. A total of 475 expressions of concern and hopes (issues) were expressed and categorized into 34 areas of concern and hopes (subsections). The most frequently mentioned issues were education; understanding, goodwill, and communication between parents; and community support. Qualitative data on both 5-step qualifier scales showed good reliability. Rasch analysis maps on concerns and hopes for children as well as on the ICF-CY assessment demonstrated good alignment and a clinically relevant progression from the least to the most disabled children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents can express valid and reliable data on their concerns and hopes for the future and can reliably assess disability in their own children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179556518784948\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556518784948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179556518784948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:评估父母对残疾孩子表达他们对未来的关注和希望的能力,评估孩子的残疾情况,并分析这些数据的一致性。方法:162名患有脊柱裂、脊髓性肌萎缩症、肌肉失调、脑瘫、视力障碍、听力障碍、精神残疾或脑肿瘤后残疾的儿童的父母被要求自由表达他们对未来的关注和希望,并采用一套26版国际功能、残疾和健康分类来评估他们自己孩子的残疾情况。儿童和青少年版本(ICF-CY)身体功能(b)代码和活动和参与(d)代码。一种扎根理论的方法被用来系统化父母的关心和希望的表达;然后,父母们用5步定性李克特量表给合格者打分。父母以同样的方式使用ICF-CY 5步限定量表评估孩子的残疾。结果:总共有119名家长自由表达了他们的担忧和希望,其中101名家长也使用了26个ICF-CY代码来评估他们孩子的残疾。共表达了475项关切和希望(问题),并将其分为34个关切和希望领域(小节)。最常提到的问题是教育;父母之间的理解、善意、沟通;还有社区支持。两种5步限定量表的定性数据均具有良好的信度。Rasch对儿童的关注和希望以及ICF-CY评估的分析图显示出良好的一致性和从最轻残疾儿童到最严重残疾儿童的临床相关进展。结论:父母可以表达他们对未来的关注和希望的有效和可靠的数据,可以可靠地评估自己孩子的残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parents' Expressions of Concerns and Hopes for the Future and Their Concomitant Assessments of Disability in Their Children.

Parents' Expressions of Concerns and Hopes for the Future and Their Concomitant Assessments of Disability in Their Children.

Parents' Expressions of Concerns and Hopes for the Future and Their Concomitant Assessments of Disability in Their Children.

Parents' Expressions of Concerns and Hopes for the Future and Their Concomitant Assessments of Disability in Their Children.

Aim: To assess parents' ability to express their concerns and hopes for the future in their children with disability and assess their children's disability as well as to analyse these data for consistency.

Method: Parents of 162 children with spina bifida, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular disorders, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, hearing impairment, mental disability, or disability following brain tumours were asked to freely express their concerns and hopes for the future and to assess disability in their own children by employing a set of 26 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) body function (b) codes and activity and participation (d) codes. A grounded theory approach was employed to systematize parents' expressions of concerns and hopes; then, parents scored qualifiers on a 5-step qualitative Likert scale. Parents assessed their children's disability in the same way using the ICF-CY 5-step qualifier scale.

Results: Altogether, 119 parents freely expressed their concerns and hopes, and 101 of them also assessed their children's disability using the 26 ICF-CY codes. A total of 475 expressions of concern and hopes (issues) were expressed and categorized into 34 areas of concern and hopes (subsections). The most frequently mentioned issues were education; understanding, goodwill, and communication between parents; and community support. Qualitative data on both 5-step qualifier scales showed good reliability. Rasch analysis maps on concerns and hopes for children as well as on the ICF-CY assessment demonstrated good alignment and a clinically relevant progression from the least to the most disabled children.

Conclusion: Parents can express valid and reliable data on their concerns and hopes for the future and can reliably assess disability in their own children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信