Vivian Kwan, Nicoline Bihelek, Vicki Anderson, Keith Yeates
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤患者的智能手机应用综述:哪些是可用的,证据是什么?","authors":"Vivian Kwan, Nicoline Bihelek, Vicki Anderson, Keith Yeates","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the number and type of smartphone applications available for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI), evaluate validity of app content, and investigate evidence for any claims made.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched iTunes and Google Play and also completed a web search. The purpose of each app and any claims were extracted, and a search for best available evidence was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy apps met our inclusion criteria (35 related to assessment, 11 to education, 9 to treatment/management, 8 to impact sensors, and 7 to symptom tracking). To the best of our knowledge, no empirical research has been published to demonstrate that the use of any particular TBI-related app leads to clinically meaningful benefits compared with not using the app. Other problems include potential biases in self-report leading to possible app misuse, lack of references for app content, and inappropriate marketing to laypersons not trained to interpret the findings of tools validated for use by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence for benefit from using TBI-related apps is minimal. More collaborative research is needed among clinicians, scientists, and app developers to determine whether, and how, apps may be helpful to individuals at risk for or following TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":519229,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E45-E51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000425","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Smartphone Applications for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is Available and What Is the Evidence?\",\"authors\":\"Vivian Kwan, Nicoline Bihelek, Vicki Anderson, Keith Yeates\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the number and type of smartphone applications available for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI), evaluate validity of app content, and investigate evidence for any claims made.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched iTunes and Google Play and also completed a web search. The purpose of each app and any claims were extracted, and a search for best available evidence was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy apps met our inclusion criteria (35 related to assessment, 11 to education, 9 to treatment/management, 8 to impact sensors, and 7 to symptom tracking). To the best of our knowledge, no empirical research has been published to demonstrate that the use of any particular TBI-related app leads to clinically meaningful benefits compared with not using the app. Other problems include potential biases in self-report leading to possible app misuse, lack of references for app content, and inappropriate marketing to laypersons not trained to interpret the findings of tools validated for use by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current evidence for benefit from using TBI-related apps is minimal. More collaborative research is needed among clinicians, scientists, and app developers to determine whether, and how, apps may be helpful to individuals at risk for or following TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E45-E51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000425\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Review of Smartphone Applications for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is Available and What Is the Evidence?
Objectives: To map the number and type of smartphone applications available for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI), evaluate validity of app content, and investigate evidence for any claims made.
Methods: We searched iTunes and Google Play and also completed a web search. The purpose of each app and any claims were extracted, and a search for best available evidence was performed.
Results: Seventy apps met our inclusion criteria (35 related to assessment, 11 to education, 9 to treatment/management, 8 to impact sensors, and 7 to symptom tracking). To the best of our knowledge, no empirical research has been published to demonstrate that the use of any particular TBI-related app leads to clinically meaningful benefits compared with not using the app. Other problems include potential biases in self-report leading to possible app misuse, lack of references for app content, and inappropriate marketing to laypersons not trained to interpret the findings of tools validated for use by healthcare professionals.
Conclusions: The current evidence for benefit from using TBI-related apps is minimal. More collaborative research is needed among clinicians, scientists, and app developers to determine whether, and how, apps may be helpful to individuals at risk for or following TBI.