根据法规(EC) 1924/2006提出的与成人认知功能有关的健康声明的声称效果、结果变量和测量方法。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
D Martini, A Innocenti, C Cosentino, G Bedogni, I Zavaroni, M Ventura, D Galli, P Mirandola, M Vitale, A Dei Cas, R C Bonadonna, G Passeri, C Pruneti, D Del Rio
{"title":"根据法规(EC) 1924/2006提出的与成人认知功能有关的健康声明的声称效果、结果变量和测量方法。","authors":"D Martini,&nbsp;A Innocenti,&nbsp;C Cosentino,&nbsp;G Bedogni,&nbsp;I Zavaroni,&nbsp;M Ventura,&nbsp;D Galli,&nbsp;P Mirandola,&nbsp;M Vitale,&nbsp;A Dei Cas,&nbsp;R C Bonadonna,&nbsp;G Passeri,&nbsp;C Pruneti,&nbsp;D Del Rio","doi":"10.12871/00039829201817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some food/food components have been the object of request of authorization to the use of health claims related to cognitive function in adults and compliant with the Regulation (EC) 1924/2006. Most of the requests have received a negative opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) also because of the choice of not appropriate outcome variables (OVs) and methods of measurement (MMs) selected in the trials used to substantiate the claim. This manuscript referes to the collection, collation and critical analysis of OVs and MMs related to cognitive function in adults. OVs and MMs were collected from the EFSA Guidance document and the applications for authorization of health claims pursuant to the Articles 13(5). The critical analysis of OVs and MMs, performed by a literature review, was aimed at defining their appropriateness in the context of a specific claimed effect. The results highlight the importance of an adequate choice of OVs and MMs for an effective substantiation of the claims related to cognitive functioning. The information provided in this document may serve to EFSA for updating the guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to cognitive functions, but also for a better design of randomized controlled trials aimed at substantiating such health claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":55476,"journal":{"name":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Claimed effects, outcome variables and methods of measurement for health claims proposed under regulation (EC) 1924/2006 and related to cognitive function in adults.\",\"authors\":\"D Martini,&nbsp;A Innocenti,&nbsp;C Cosentino,&nbsp;G Bedogni,&nbsp;I Zavaroni,&nbsp;M Ventura,&nbsp;D Galli,&nbsp;P Mirandola,&nbsp;M Vitale,&nbsp;A Dei Cas,&nbsp;R C Bonadonna,&nbsp;G Passeri,&nbsp;C Pruneti,&nbsp;D Del Rio\",\"doi\":\"10.12871/00039829201817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some food/food components have been the object of request of authorization to the use of health claims related to cognitive function in adults and compliant with the Regulation (EC) 1924/2006. Most of the requests have received a negative opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) also because of the choice of not appropriate outcome variables (OVs) and methods of measurement (MMs) selected in the trials used to substantiate the claim. This manuscript referes to the collection, collation and critical analysis of OVs and MMs related to cognitive function in adults. OVs and MMs were collected from the EFSA Guidance document and the applications for authorization of health claims pursuant to the Articles 13(5). The critical analysis of OVs and MMs, performed by a literature review, was aimed at defining their appropriateness in the context of a specific claimed effect. The results highlight the importance of an adequate choice of OVs and MMs for an effective substantiation of the claims related to cognitive functioning. The information provided in this document may serve to EFSA for updating the guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to cognitive functions, but also for a better design of randomized controlled trials aimed at substantiating such health claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives Italiennes De Biologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives Italiennes De Biologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12871/00039829201817\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Italiennes De Biologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12871/00039829201817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

某些食品/食品成分已成为要求授权使用与成人认知功能有关的健康声明的对象,并符合法规(EC) 1924/2006。大多数请求都收到了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的负面意见,也是因为在用于证实声明的试验中选择了不适当的结果变量(OVs)和测量方法(mm)。本文是对成人认知功能相关的OVs和mm的收集、整理和批判性分析。OVs和mm是从EFSA指导文件和根据第13(5)条授权的健康声明申请中收集的。通过文献综述对OVs和mm进行批判性分析,旨在确定它们在特定声称效果的背景下的适当性。结果强调了充分选择OVs和mm对于有效证实与认知功能相关的主张的重要性。本文件提供的信息可能有助于欧洲食品安全局更新有关认知功能健康声明的科学要求的指导,也有助于更好地设计旨在证实此类健康声明的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Claimed effects, outcome variables and methods of measurement for health claims proposed under regulation (EC) 1924/2006 and related to cognitive function in adults.

Some food/food components have been the object of request of authorization to the use of health claims related to cognitive function in adults and compliant with the Regulation (EC) 1924/2006. Most of the requests have received a negative opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) also because of the choice of not appropriate outcome variables (OVs) and methods of measurement (MMs) selected in the trials used to substantiate the claim. This manuscript referes to the collection, collation and critical analysis of OVs and MMs related to cognitive function in adults. OVs and MMs were collected from the EFSA Guidance document and the applications for authorization of health claims pursuant to the Articles 13(5). The critical analysis of OVs and MMs, performed by a literature review, was aimed at defining their appropriateness in the context of a specific claimed effect. The results highlight the importance of an adequate choice of OVs and MMs for an effective substantiation of the claims related to cognitive functioning. The information provided in this document may serve to EFSA for updating the guidance on the scientific requirements for health claims related to cognitive functions, but also for a better design of randomized controlled trials aimed at substantiating such health claims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives Italiennes De Biologie
Archives Italiennes De Biologie 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
30.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives Italiennes de Biologie - a Journal of Neuroscience- was founded in 1882 and represents one of the oldest neuroscience journals in the world. Archives publishes original contributions in all the fields of neuroscience, including neurophysiology, experimental neuroanatomy and electron microscopy, neurobiology, neurochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, functional brain imaging and behavioral science. Archives Italiennes de Biologie also publishes monographic special issues that collect papers on a specific topic of interest in neuroscience as well as the proceedings of important scientific events. Archives Italiennes de Biologie is published in 4 issues per year and is indexed in the major collections of biomedical journals, including Medline, PubMed, Current Contents, Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信