超声评估腘绳肌腱直径:能否预测移植物的大小?

Diego da Costa Astur, João Victor Novaretti, Andre Cicone Liggieri, César Janovsky, Alexandre Pedro Nicolini, Moises Cohen
{"title":"超声评估腘绳肌腱直径:能否预测移植物的大小?","authors":"Diego da Costa Astur,&nbsp;João Victor Novaretti,&nbsp;Andre Cicone Liggieri,&nbsp;César Janovsky,&nbsp;Alexandre Pedro Nicolini,&nbsp;Moises Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Perform the preoperative measurement of the hamstring tendons using ultrasound imaging, validating and correlating the measured value with that found during surgical reconstruction of the ligament.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was carried out with 24 patients who underwent ultrasonographic measurement of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscle tendons and were subsequently submitted to surgical reconstruction of the ACL, with ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patients’ ages ranged from 16 to 43 years, with a mean of 24.8 years (SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.4 years), 79.2% were men, and the distribution by side was 41.7% right knees and 58.3% left knees. A non-significant correlation coefficient was found between the area calculated by ultrasound (2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->semitendinosus area<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->gracilis area) and the intraoperative measurement (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.16; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.443). No evidence of a difference between intraoperative measurements &lt;8<!--> <!-->mm and ≥8<!--> <!-->mm was found for the area calculated by the ultrasound (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.746). The difference observed between the groups was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.07).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative ultrasound imaging of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons does not present a statistically significant correlation with the intraoperative measurement of the quadruple hamstring graft for ligament reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101095,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 404-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.005","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft?\",\"authors\":\"Diego da Costa Astur,&nbsp;João Victor Novaretti,&nbsp;Andre Cicone Liggieri,&nbsp;César Janovsky,&nbsp;Alexandre Pedro Nicolini,&nbsp;Moises Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Perform the preoperative measurement of the hamstring tendons using ultrasound imaging, validating and correlating the measured value with that found during surgical reconstruction of the ligament.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was carried out with 24 patients who underwent ultrasonographic measurement of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscle tendons and were subsequently submitted to surgical reconstruction of the ACL, with ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The patients’ ages ranged from 16 to 43 years, with a mean of 24.8 years (SD<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->8.4 years), 79.2% were men, and the distribution by side was 41.7% right knees and 58.3% left knees. A non-significant correlation coefficient was found between the area calculated by ultrasound (2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->semitendinosus area<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->gracilis area) and the intraoperative measurement (<em>r</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.16; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.443). No evidence of a difference between intraoperative measurements &lt;8<!--> <!-->mm and ≥8<!--> <!-->mm was found for the area calculated by the ultrasound (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.746). The difference observed between the groups was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.07).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative ultrasound imaging of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons does not present a statistically significant correlation with the intraoperative measurement of the quadruple hamstring graft for ligament reconstruction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 404-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.005\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的应用超声技术对腘绳肌腱进行术前测量,并将测量值与手术韧带重建时的测量值进行验证和比较。方法对24例经超声测量半腱肌和股薄肌肌腱后行同侧半腱肌和股薄肌腱移植术重建前交叉韧带的患者进行横断面研究。结果患者年龄16 ~ 43岁,平均24.8岁(SD = 8.4岁),男性占79.2%,侧分布为右膝41.7%,左膝58.3%。超声计算面积(2 ×半腱肌面积+ 2 ×股薄肌面积)与术中测量无显著相关系数(r = 0.16;p = 0.443)。术中超声测量的面积≥8mm与≥8mm无差异(p = 0.746)。各组间观察到的差异为- 0.01 (95% CI: - 0.09 ~ 0.07)。结论术前半腱肌和股薄肌超声成像与四股腘绳肌腱移植韧带重建术中测量无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft?

Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft?

Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft?

Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft?

Objective

Perform the preoperative measurement of the hamstring tendons using ultrasound imaging, validating and correlating the measured value with that found during surgical reconstruction of the ligament.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out with 24 patients who underwent ultrasonographic measurement of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscle tendons and were subsequently submitted to surgical reconstruction of the ACL, with ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafting.

Results

The patients’ ages ranged from 16 to 43 years, with a mean of 24.8 years (SD = 8.4 years), 79.2% were men, and the distribution by side was 41.7% right knees and 58.3% left knees. A non-significant correlation coefficient was found between the area calculated by ultrasound (2 × semitendinosus area + 2 × gracilis area) and the intraoperative measurement (r = 0.16; p = 0.443). No evidence of a difference between intraoperative measurements <8 mm and ≥8 mm was found for the area calculated by the ultrasound (p = 0.746). The difference observed between the groups was −0.01 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.07).

Conclusion

Preoperative ultrasound imaging of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons does not present a statistically significant correlation with the intraoperative measurement of the quadruple hamstring graft for ligament reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信