外伤性穿透性颈部损伤伴右侧颈总动脉夹层狭窄的支架置入术治疗:1例报告及文献复习。

Case Reports in Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2018-06-10 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/4602743
Seidu A Richard, Chang Wei Zhang, Cong Wu, Wang Ting, Xie Xiaodong
{"title":"外伤性穿透性颈部损伤伴右侧颈总动脉夹层狭窄的支架置入术治疗:1例报告及文献复习。","authors":"Seidu A Richard,&nbsp;Chang Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Cong Wu,&nbsp;Wang Ting,&nbsp;Xie Xiaodong","doi":"10.1155/2018/4602743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penetrating neck injuries (PNI) are common and associated with arterial and other neuronal injuries. Although many authors have written on penetrating and blunt carotid artery injuries as a result of PNI or traumatic neck injuries, no one has reported a case or case series on PNI that resulted in blunt carotid dissection and stenosis.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present a case of 40-year-old building and construction male worker who slipped and fell on an iron rod that resulted in penetrating wound on the right side of the anterior neck a week prior to presenting at our facility. He pulled out the iron rod immediately. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) done revealed C2-C4 transverse process fractures on the right side and a fracture at the right lamina of C3 and right common carotid artery dissection with stenosis. He was successfully treated with stenting via endovascular approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We adopt the view that patient should never pull out objects that result in PNI because of complex neurovascular architecture of the neck. The mortality rate of our patient will have doubled if the iron rode penetrated the common carotid artery. The gold standard treatment option for carotid artery dissection and stenosis is endovascular approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9632,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Vascular Medicine","volume":"2018 ","pages":"4602743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4602743","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traumatic Penetrating Neck Injury with Right Common Carotid Artery Dissection and Stenosis Effectively Managed with Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Seidu A Richard,&nbsp;Chang Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Cong Wu,&nbsp;Wang Ting,&nbsp;Xie Xiaodong\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/4602743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penetrating neck injuries (PNI) are common and associated with arterial and other neuronal injuries. Although many authors have written on penetrating and blunt carotid artery injuries as a result of PNI or traumatic neck injuries, no one has reported a case or case series on PNI that resulted in blunt carotid dissection and stenosis.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present a case of 40-year-old building and construction male worker who slipped and fell on an iron rod that resulted in penetrating wound on the right side of the anterior neck a week prior to presenting at our facility. He pulled out the iron rod immediately. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) done revealed C2-C4 transverse process fractures on the right side and a fracture at the right lamina of C3 and right common carotid artery dissection with stenosis. He was successfully treated with stenting via endovascular approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We adopt the view that patient should never pull out objects that result in PNI because of complex neurovascular architecture of the neck. The mortality rate of our patient will have doubled if the iron rode penetrated the common carotid artery. The gold standard treatment option for carotid artery dissection and stenosis is endovascular approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Reports in Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"4602743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4602743\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Reports in Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4602743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4602743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

穿透性颈部损伤(PNI)很常见,并与动脉和其他神经元损伤有关。尽管许多作者都写过由于PNI或外伤性颈部损伤导致的穿透性和钝性颈动脉损伤,但没有人报道过PNI导致钝性颈动脉夹层和狭窄的病例或病例系列。病例介绍:我们报告了一位40岁的建筑和建筑男性工人,他在一根铁棒上滑倒并摔倒,导致颈部前右侧穿透性伤口。他立刻拔出了铁棒。计算机断层血管造影(CTA)显示右侧C2-C4横突骨折,右侧C3椎板骨折,右侧颈总动脉夹层狭窄。经血管内入路支架成功治疗。结论:我们认为,由于颈部复杂的神经血管结构,患者不应拔出导致PNI的物体。如果铁钉刺穿颈总动脉病人的死亡率会增加一倍。颈动脉夹层和狭窄的金标准治疗选择是血管内入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Traumatic Penetrating Neck Injury with Right Common Carotid Artery Dissection and Stenosis Effectively Managed with Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Traumatic Penetrating Neck Injury with Right Common Carotid Artery Dissection and Stenosis Effectively Managed with Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Traumatic Penetrating Neck Injury with Right Common Carotid Artery Dissection and Stenosis Effectively Managed with Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Traumatic Penetrating Neck Injury with Right Common Carotid Artery Dissection and Stenosis Effectively Managed with Stenting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Introduction: Penetrating neck injuries (PNI) are common and associated with arterial and other neuronal injuries. Although many authors have written on penetrating and blunt carotid artery injuries as a result of PNI or traumatic neck injuries, no one has reported a case or case series on PNI that resulted in blunt carotid dissection and stenosis.

Case presentation: We present a case of 40-year-old building and construction male worker who slipped and fell on an iron rod that resulted in penetrating wound on the right side of the anterior neck a week prior to presenting at our facility. He pulled out the iron rod immediately. Computer tomography angiography (CTA) done revealed C2-C4 transverse process fractures on the right side and a fracture at the right lamina of C3 and right common carotid artery dissection with stenosis. He was successfully treated with stenting via endovascular approach.

Conclusions: We adopt the view that patient should never pull out objects that result in PNI because of complex neurovascular architecture of the neck. The mortality rate of our patient will have doubled if the iron rode penetrated the common carotid artery. The gold standard treatment option for carotid artery dissection and stenosis is endovascular approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信