{"title":"对监护人祖母使用 CES-D：交叉验证和收敛有效性。","authors":"Will Merchant, Gregory Smith, Bert Hayslip","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study is the first to analyze the factor structure of the Center for Epistemological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale with custodial grandmothers involving both cross validation and convergent validity analyses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross validation was accomplished with two different samples of custodial grandmothers (GCM) to calibrate (<i>n</i>=733; Average Age=52) and then validate (<i>n</i>=343; Average Age=52.5) the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radloff's originally proposed four factor model (Depressed Affect, Well-Being, Somatic Symptoms, and Interpersonal Problems) was found to best fit the data for both calibration (RMSEA=0.049) and validation samples (<i>RMSEA</i>=0.050). The construct validity of the four CES-D factors was supported by the correlations observed between these factors and conceptually related psychosocial measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>four CES-D factors as proposed are psychometrically sound when applied to custodial grandmothers and that each factor contributes unique and meaningful information in its own right.</p>","PeriodicalId":89419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health and aging","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029623/pdf/nihms906614.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the CES-D with custodial grandmothers: cross-validation and convergent validity.\",\"authors\":\"Will Merchant, Gregory Smith, Bert Hayslip\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study is the first to analyze the factor structure of the Center for Epistemological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale with custodial grandmothers involving both cross validation and convergent validity analyses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross validation was accomplished with two different samples of custodial grandmothers (GCM) to calibrate (<i>n</i>=733; Average Age=52) and then validate (<i>n</i>=343; Average Age=52.5) the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radloff's originally proposed four factor model (Depressed Affect, Well-Being, Somatic Symptoms, and Interpersonal Problems) was found to best fit the data for both calibration (RMSEA=0.049) and validation samples (<i>RMSEA</i>=0.050). The construct validity of the four CES-D factors was supported by the correlations observed between these factors and conceptually related psychosocial measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>four CES-D factors as proposed are psychometrically sound when applied to custodial grandmothers and that each factor contributes unique and meaningful information in its own right.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mental health and aging\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6029623/pdf/nihms906614.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mental health and aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health and aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using the CES-D with custodial grandmothers: cross-validation and convergent validity.
Objective: This study is the first to analyze the factor structure of the Center for Epistemological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale with custodial grandmothers involving both cross validation and convergent validity analyses.
Method: Cross validation was accomplished with two different samples of custodial grandmothers (GCM) to calibrate (n=733; Average Age=52) and then validate (n=343; Average Age=52.5) the model.
Results: Radloff's originally proposed four factor model (Depressed Affect, Well-Being, Somatic Symptoms, and Interpersonal Problems) was found to best fit the data for both calibration (RMSEA=0.049) and validation samples (RMSEA=0.050). The construct validity of the four CES-D factors was supported by the correlations observed between these factors and conceptually related psychosocial measures.
Conclusion: four CES-D factors as proposed are psychometrically sound when applied to custodial grandmothers and that each factor contributes unique and meaningful information in its own right.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
