{"title":"大规模缓刑:迈向更健全的国家惩罚变化理论。","authors":"Michelle S Phelps","doi":"10.1177/1462474516649174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scholarship on the expansion of the U.S. carceral state has primarily focused on imprisonment rates. Yet the majority of adults under formal criminal justice control are on probation, an \"alternative\" form of supervision. This article develops the concept of <i>mass probation</i> and builds a typology of state control regimes that theorizes both the scale and type of punishment states employ. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data from 1980 and 2010, I analyze whether mass probation developed in the same places, affecting the same demographic groups and driven by the same criminal justice trends, as mass imprisonment. The results show that mass probation was a unique state development, expanding in unusual places like Minnesota and Washington. The conclusions argue for a reimagining of the causes and consequences of the carceral state to incorporate the expansion of probation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74620,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & society","volume":"19 1","pages":"53-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1462474516649174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle S Phelps\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1462474516649174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scholarship on the expansion of the U.S. carceral state has primarily focused on imprisonment rates. Yet the majority of adults under formal criminal justice control are on probation, an \\\"alternative\\\" form of supervision. This article develops the concept of <i>mass probation</i> and builds a typology of state control regimes that theorizes both the scale and type of punishment states employ. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data from 1980 and 2010, I analyze whether mass probation developed in the same places, affecting the same demographic groups and driven by the same criminal justice trends, as mass imprisonment. The results show that mass probation was a unique state development, expanding in unusual places like Minnesota and Washington. The conclusions argue for a reimagining of the causes and consequences of the carceral state to incorporate the expansion of probation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Punishment & society\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"53-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1462474516649174\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Punishment & society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516649174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punishment & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516649174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于美国监狱扩张的研究主要集中在监禁率上。然而,大多数受到正式刑事司法控制的成年人都是缓刑,这是一种“替代”的监督形式。本文发展了大规模缓刑的概念,并建立了一个国家控制制度的类型学,将国家采用的惩罚的规模和类型理论化。根据美国司法统计局(Bureau of Justice Statistics) 1980年至2010年的数据,我分析了大规模缓刑是否与大规模监禁一样,在同样的地方发展,影响同样的人口群体,受到同样的刑事司法趋势的驱动。结果表明,大规模缓刑是一个独特的州发展,在明尼苏达州和华盛顿州等不寻常的地方扩大。结论主张重新设想监禁状态的原因和后果,以纳入缓刑的扩大。
Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment.
Scholarship on the expansion of the U.S. carceral state has primarily focused on imprisonment rates. Yet the majority of adults under formal criminal justice control are on probation, an "alternative" form of supervision. This article develops the concept of mass probation and builds a typology of state control regimes that theorizes both the scale and type of punishment states employ. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data from 1980 and 2010, I analyze whether mass probation developed in the same places, affecting the same demographic groups and driven by the same criminal justice trends, as mass imprisonment. The results show that mass probation was a unique state development, expanding in unusual places like Minnesota and Washington. The conclusions argue for a reimagining of the causes and consequences of the carceral state to incorporate the expansion of probation.