外周血和脂肪组织干细胞亚群间干细胞基因表达的比较。

IF 1.5 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
American journal of stem cells Pub Date : 2018-06-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01
Maria Teresa González-Garza, Delia E Cruz-Vega, Alejandro Cárdenas-Lopez, Rosa Maria de la Rosa, Jorge E Moreno-Cuevas
{"title":"外周血和脂肪组织干细胞亚群间干细胞基因表达的比较。","authors":"Maria Teresa González-Garza,&nbsp;Delia E Cruz-Vega,&nbsp;Alejandro Cárdenas-Lopez,&nbsp;Rosa Maria de la Rosa,&nbsp;Jorge E Moreno-Cuevas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cell therapy presents a promising alternative for the treatment of degenerative diseases. The main sources of adult stem cells are bone marrow, adipose tissue and peripheral blood. Within those tissues, there are cell subpopulations that share pluripotential characteristics. Nevertheless, there is insufficient data to determine which of these stem cell subtypes would have a better possibility to differentiate to a specific tissue. The objective of this research was to analyze and compare the stemness genes expression from peripheral blood and adipose tissue of plastic adherent cells, and those immune-selected by the CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD271<sup>+</sup> membrane markers. On all cell subpopulation groups, self-renew capacity, the membranes markers CD73, CD90 and CD105, as well as the stemness genes <i>NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, REX1, NOTCH1</i> and, <i>NESTIN</i> expression were analyzed. Results showed that all samples presented the minimal criteria to define them as human stem cells. All cell subpopulation were capable of self-renewal. Nevertheless, the subpopulation cell types showed differences on the time needed to reach confluence. The slowest doubling times were for those cells bearing the CD133 marker from both sources. Surface markers determined by flow cytometry were positive for CD73, CD90 and, CD105, and negative for CD45. The stemness gene expression was positive in all subpopulation. However, there were significant differences in the amount and pattern of expression among them. Those differences could be advantageous in finding the best option for their application on cell therapy. Cells with high expression of <i>OCT4</i> gene could be a better opportunity for neuron differentiation like CD133<sup>+</sup> blood cells. On the other hand, lowest expression of <i>NOTCH1</i> on CD271<sup>+</sup> cells from the same source could be a better possibility for myoblast differentiation. The observed differences could be used as an advantage to find which cell type and from the different source; this represents the best option for its application on cell therapy. Experiments focused on the best response to specific differentiation, are conducted in order to confirm those possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7657,"journal":{"name":"American journal of stem cells","volume":"7 2","pages":"38-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013721/pdf/ajsc0007-0038.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing stemness gene expression between stem cell subpopulations from peripheral blood and adipose tissue.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Teresa González-Garza,&nbsp;Delia E Cruz-Vega,&nbsp;Alejandro Cárdenas-Lopez,&nbsp;Rosa Maria de la Rosa,&nbsp;Jorge E Moreno-Cuevas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cell therapy presents a promising alternative for the treatment of degenerative diseases. The main sources of adult stem cells are bone marrow, adipose tissue and peripheral blood. Within those tissues, there are cell subpopulations that share pluripotential characteristics. Nevertheless, there is insufficient data to determine which of these stem cell subtypes would have a better possibility to differentiate to a specific tissue. The objective of this research was to analyze and compare the stemness genes expression from peripheral blood and adipose tissue of plastic adherent cells, and those immune-selected by the CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD271<sup>+</sup> membrane markers. On all cell subpopulation groups, self-renew capacity, the membranes markers CD73, CD90 and CD105, as well as the stemness genes <i>NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, REX1, NOTCH1</i> and, <i>NESTIN</i> expression were analyzed. Results showed that all samples presented the minimal criteria to define them as human stem cells. All cell subpopulation were capable of self-renewal. Nevertheless, the subpopulation cell types showed differences on the time needed to reach confluence. The slowest doubling times were for those cells bearing the CD133 marker from both sources. Surface markers determined by flow cytometry were positive for CD73, CD90 and, CD105, and negative for CD45. The stemness gene expression was positive in all subpopulation. However, there were significant differences in the amount and pattern of expression among them. Those differences could be advantageous in finding the best option for their application on cell therapy. Cells with high expression of <i>OCT4</i> gene could be a better opportunity for neuron differentiation like CD133<sup>+</sup> blood cells. On the other hand, lowest expression of <i>NOTCH1</i> on CD271<sup>+</sup> cells from the same source could be a better possibility for myoblast differentiation. The observed differences could be used as an advantage to find which cell type and from the different source; this represents the best option for its application on cell therapy. Experiments focused on the best response to specific differentiation, are conducted in order to confirm those possibilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of stem cells\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"38-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013721/pdf/ajsc0007-0038.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of stem cells\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of stem cells","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细胞疗法为退行性疾病的治疗提供了一个很有前途的选择。成体干细胞的主要来源是骨髓、脂肪组织和外周血。在这些组织中,存在具有多能性特征的细胞亚群。然而,没有足够的数据来确定这些干细胞亚型中哪一种更有可能分化为特定的组织。本研究的目的是分析和比较来自外周血和脂肪组织的塑料贴壁细胞的干性基因表达,以及CD133+和CD271+膜标记免疫选择的细胞。分析各细胞亚群的自我更新能力、膜标志物CD73、CD90和CD105以及干性基因NANOG、OCT4、SOX2、REX1、NOTCH1和NESTIN的表达情况。结果表明,所有的样本都具有将其定义为人类干细胞的最低标准。所有细胞亚群都具有自我更新的能力。然而,亚群细胞类型在达到融合所需的时间上存在差异。携带两种来源CD133标记的细胞加倍时间最慢。流式细胞术检测表面标记CD73、CD90和CD105阳性,CD45阴性。干性基因在所有亚群中表达均为阳性。但在表达量和表达方式上存在显著差异。这些差异可能有助于找到将其应用于细胞治疗的最佳选择。OCT4基因高表达的细胞,如CD133+血细胞,可能为神经元分化提供更好的机会。另一方面,同一来源的CD271+细胞中NOTCH1的最低表达可能更有可能分化成肌细胞。观察到的差异可以作为一种优势来发现细胞类型和来自不同的来源;这是其应用于细胞治疗的最佳选择。为了确认这些可能性,进行了针对特定分化的最佳反应的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing stemness gene expression between stem cell subpopulations from peripheral blood and adipose tissue.

Comparing stemness gene expression between stem cell subpopulations from peripheral blood and adipose tissue.

Comparing stemness gene expression between stem cell subpopulations from peripheral blood and adipose tissue.

Comparing stemness gene expression between stem cell subpopulations from peripheral blood and adipose tissue.

Cell therapy presents a promising alternative for the treatment of degenerative diseases. The main sources of adult stem cells are bone marrow, adipose tissue and peripheral blood. Within those tissues, there are cell subpopulations that share pluripotential characteristics. Nevertheless, there is insufficient data to determine which of these stem cell subtypes would have a better possibility to differentiate to a specific tissue. The objective of this research was to analyze and compare the stemness genes expression from peripheral blood and adipose tissue of plastic adherent cells, and those immune-selected by the CD133+ and CD271+ membrane markers. On all cell subpopulation groups, self-renew capacity, the membranes markers CD73, CD90 and CD105, as well as the stemness genes NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, REX1, NOTCH1 and, NESTIN expression were analyzed. Results showed that all samples presented the minimal criteria to define them as human stem cells. All cell subpopulation were capable of self-renewal. Nevertheless, the subpopulation cell types showed differences on the time needed to reach confluence. The slowest doubling times were for those cells bearing the CD133 marker from both sources. Surface markers determined by flow cytometry were positive for CD73, CD90 and, CD105, and negative for CD45. The stemness gene expression was positive in all subpopulation. However, there were significant differences in the amount and pattern of expression among them. Those differences could be advantageous in finding the best option for their application on cell therapy. Cells with high expression of OCT4 gene could be a better opportunity for neuron differentiation like CD133+ blood cells. On the other hand, lowest expression of NOTCH1 on CD271+ cells from the same source could be a better possibility for myoblast differentiation. The observed differences could be used as an advantage to find which cell type and from the different source; this represents the best option for its application on cell therapy. Experiments focused on the best response to specific differentiation, are conducted in order to confirm those possibilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信