基因组知识量表的开发和验证,以促进基因组测序的知情决策研究。

IF 1.7
MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-01 DOI:10.1177/2381468317692582
Michelle M Langer, Myra I Roche, Noel T Brewer, Jonathan S Berg, Cynthia M Khan, Cristina Leos, Elizabeth Moore, Michelle Brown, Christine Rini
{"title":"基因组知识量表的开发和验证,以促进基因组测序的知情决策研究。","authors":"Michelle M Langer,&nbsp;Myra I Roche,&nbsp;Noel T Brewer,&nbsp;Jonathan S Berg,&nbsp;Cynthia M Khan,&nbsp;Cristina Leos,&nbsp;Elizabeth Moore,&nbsp;Michelle Brown,&nbsp;Christine Rini","doi":"10.1177/2381468317692582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a new, comprehensive measure of knowledge about genomic sequencing, the University of North Carolina Genomic Knowledge Scale (UNC-GKS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UNC-GKS assesses knowledge in four domains thought to be critical for informed decision making about genomic sequencing. The scale was validated using classical test theory and item response theory in 286 adult patients and 132 parents of pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic whole exome sequencing (WES) in the NCGENES study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UNC-GKS assessed a single underlying construct (genomic knowledge) with good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Scores were most informative (able to discriminate between individuals with different levels of genomic knowledge) at one standard deviation above the scale mean or lower, a range that included most participants. Convergent validity was supported by associations with health literacy and numeracy (<i>r</i>s=0.41-0.46). The scale functioned well across subgroups differing in sex, race/ethnicity, education, and English proficiency.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings supported the promise of the UNC-GKS as a valid and reliable measure of genomic knowledge among people facing complex decisions about WES and comparable sequencing methods. It is neither disease- nor population-specific, and it functioned well across important subgroups, making it usable in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2381468317692582","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle M Langer,&nbsp;Myra I Roche,&nbsp;Noel T Brewer,&nbsp;Jonathan S Berg,&nbsp;Cynthia M Khan,&nbsp;Cristina Leos,&nbsp;Elizabeth Moore,&nbsp;Michelle Brown,&nbsp;Christine Rini\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2381468317692582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a new, comprehensive measure of knowledge about genomic sequencing, the University of North Carolina Genomic Knowledge Scale (UNC-GKS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UNC-GKS assesses knowledge in four domains thought to be critical for informed decision making about genomic sequencing. The scale was validated using classical test theory and item response theory in 286 adult patients and 132 parents of pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic whole exome sequencing (WES) in the NCGENES study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UNC-GKS assessed a single underlying construct (genomic knowledge) with good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Scores were most informative (able to discriminate between individuals with different levels of genomic knowledge) at one standard deviation above the scale mean or lower, a range that included most participants. Convergent validity was supported by associations with health literacy and numeracy (<i>r</i>s=0.41-0.46). The scale functioned well across subgroups differing in sex, race/ethnicity, education, and English proficiency.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings supported the promise of the UNC-GKS as a valid and reliable measure of genomic knowledge among people facing complex decisions about WES and comparable sequencing methods. It is neither disease- nor population-specific, and it functioned well across important subgroups, making it usable in diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2381468317692582\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM policy & practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317692582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317692582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

背景:本研究评估了一种新的、全面的基因组测序知识测量方法——北卡罗来纳大学基因组知识量表(UNC-GKS)的心理测量特性。方法:UNC-GKS评估了四个领域的知识,这些领域被认为对基因组测序的知情决策至关重要。采用经典测试理论和项目反应理论对NCGENES研究中286例成人患者和132例儿科患者家长进行诊断性全外显子组测序(WES)验证。结果:UNC-GKS评估了一个具有良好内部信度的单一基础结构(基因组知识)(Cronbach's alpha = 0.90)。分数的信息量最大(能够区分具有不同基因组知识水平的个体),在高于或低于尺度平均值的一个标准差范围内,这个范围包括了大多数参与者。趋同效度与健康素养和计算能力相关(rs=0.41-0.46)。该量表在不同性别、种族/民族、教育程度和英语熟练程度的亚组中表现良好。讨论:研究结果支持UNC-GKS作为一种有效和可靠的测量基因组知识的承诺,人们面临着关于WES和类似测序方法的复杂决策。它既不是针对特定疾病,也不是针对特定人群,而且它在重要的亚群中发挥了良好的作用,使其可用于不同的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.

Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.

Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.

Development and Validation of a Genomic Knowledge Scale to Advance Informed Decision Making Research in Genomic Sequencing.

Background: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a new, comprehensive measure of knowledge about genomic sequencing, the University of North Carolina Genomic Knowledge Scale (UNC-GKS).

Methods: The UNC-GKS assesses knowledge in four domains thought to be critical for informed decision making about genomic sequencing. The scale was validated using classical test theory and item response theory in 286 adult patients and 132 parents of pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic whole exome sequencing (WES) in the NCGENES study.

Results: The UNC-GKS assessed a single underlying construct (genomic knowledge) with good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90). Scores were most informative (able to discriminate between individuals with different levels of genomic knowledge) at one standard deviation above the scale mean or lower, a range that included most participants. Convergent validity was supported by associations with health literacy and numeracy (rs=0.41-0.46). The scale functioned well across subgroups differing in sex, race/ethnicity, education, and English proficiency.

Discussion: Findings supported the promise of the UNC-GKS as a valid and reliable measure of genomic knowledge among people facing complex decisions about WES and comparable sequencing methods. It is neither disease- nor population-specific, and it functioned well across important subgroups, making it usable in diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信