{"title":"手术入路对全髋关节置换术后肌力和功能的影响。","authors":"Joseph Zeni, Kathleen Madara, James Rubano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become standard procedure to manag the symptoms of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), there are multiple surgical approaches to acceE the hip joint. To date, there is limited information on the effect of surgical approach on muscle strength and performance-based measures of functional ability after THA.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of posterior or anterolateral surgical approaches on strength and function after THA. We hypothesized that individuals who underwent a posterior approach would have greater strength and performance-based measures of function than individuals who underwent an anterolateral approach one year after surgery. We also hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain or self-reported outcomes at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 subjects were tested two to four weeks prior to THA and then three months and 12 months after THA. Subjects were divided into a posterior approach and lateral approac groups. Patients completed functional testing, strength measures, as well as self-reported questionnaires at each time point. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to test the change between the pre-operative and one year time point. Descriptive data were reported for all three time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction effect for hip abduction strength (p=0.025) and the lateral group was significantly weaker at one year (p=0.018). No other variable demonstrated a significant interaction effect; however, all other variables with the exception of hip abductor strength (p=0.883) and pain on the non-operated side (p=0.527) demonstrated a significant main effect of time (p≤0.01) in which there was significant improvement at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral surgical approaches result in weaker hip abduction one year after THA; however significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional ability were seen for most subiects. regardless of surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":75779,"journal":{"name":"Delaware medical journal","volume":"88 11","pages":"334-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Surgical Approach on Strength and Function after Total Hip Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Zeni, Kathleen Madara, James Rubano\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become standard procedure to manag the symptoms of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), there are multiple surgical approaches to acceE the hip joint. To date, there is limited information on the effect of surgical approach on muscle strength and performance-based measures of functional ability after THA.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of posterior or anterolateral surgical approaches on strength and function after THA. We hypothesized that individuals who underwent a posterior approach would have greater strength and performance-based measures of function than individuals who underwent an anterolateral approach one year after surgery. We also hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain or self-reported outcomes at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 subjects were tested two to four weeks prior to THA and then three months and 12 months after THA. Subjects were divided into a posterior approach and lateral approac groups. Patients completed functional testing, strength measures, as well as self-reported questionnaires at each time point. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to test the change between the pre-operative and one year time point. Descriptive data were reported for all three time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant interaction effect for hip abduction strength (p=0.025) and the lateral group was significantly weaker at one year (p=0.018). No other variable demonstrated a significant interaction effect; however, all other variables with the exception of hip abductor strength (p=0.883) and pain on the non-operated side (p=0.527) demonstrated a significant main effect of time (p≤0.01) in which there was significant improvement at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lateral surgical approaches result in weaker hip abduction one year after THA; however significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional ability were seen for most subiects. regardless of surgical approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delaware medical journal\",\"volume\":\"88 11\",\"pages\":\"334-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delaware medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Surgical Approach on Strength and Function after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Background: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become standard procedure to manag the symptoms of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA), there are multiple surgical approaches to acceE the hip joint. To date, there is limited information on the effect of surgical approach on muscle strength and performance-based measures of functional ability after THA.
Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of posterior or anterolateral surgical approaches on strength and function after THA. We hypothesized that individuals who underwent a posterior approach would have greater strength and performance-based measures of function than individuals who underwent an anterolateral approach one year after surgery. We also hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain or self-reported outcomes at follow-up.
Methods: 63 subjects were tested two to four weeks prior to THA and then three months and 12 months after THA. Subjects were divided into a posterior approach and lateral approac groups. Patients completed functional testing, strength measures, as well as self-reported questionnaires at each time point. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to test the change between the pre-operative and one year time point. Descriptive data were reported for all three time points.
Results: There was a significant interaction effect for hip abduction strength (p=0.025) and the lateral group was significantly weaker at one year (p=0.018). No other variable demonstrated a significant interaction effect; however, all other variables with the exception of hip abductor strength (p=0.883) and pain on the non-operated side (p=0.527) demonstrated a significant main effect of time (p≤0.01) in which there was significant improvement at 1 year.
Conclusion: The lateral surgical approaches result in weaker hip abduction one year after THA; however significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional ability were seen for most subiects. regardless of surgical approach.