肱骨头螺钉水泥增强可减少肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板后早期植入物相关并发症。

IF 0.5 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
J Christoph Katthagen, O Lutz, C Voigt, H Lill, A Ellwein
{"title":"肱骨头螺钉水泥增强可减少肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板后早期植入物相关并发症。","authors":"J Christoph Katthagen,&nbsp;O Lutz,&nbsp;C Voigt,&nbsp;H Lill,&nbsp;A Ellwein","doi":"10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cement augmentation (CA) of humeral head screws in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) was found to be biomechanically beneficial. However, clinical outcomes of this treatment have not been well evaluated to date.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess outcomes of locked plating of PHF with additional CA and to compare them with outcomes of conventional locked plating without CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>24 patients (mean age, 74.2 ± 10.1 years; 22 female) with displaced PHF were prospectively enrolled and treated with locked plating and additional CA. The Constant score (CS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Simple Shoulder Value (SSV) were assessed 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Fracture healing and potential complications were evaluated on postoperative radiographs. The CS and complications were compared with the outcomes of a matched group of 24 patients (mean age, 73.9 ± 9.4 years; 22 female) with locked plating of displaced PHF without CA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 3‑month follow-up, the mean CS was 59.9 ± 15.6 points, the mean SST was 7.5 ± 2.7 points, and the mean SSV was 63.9 ± 21.7%. All scores significantly improved by the 12-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05; CS, 72.9 ± 17.7; SST, 9.2 ± 3.2; SSV, 77.2 ± 17.3%). There were two cases (8%) of biological complications (<i>n</i> = 1 varus malunion and <i>n</i> = 1 humeral head necrosis). Compared with locked plating without CA, no significant differences were observed between the CS at the 3‑ (57.8 ± 13.4 points; <i>p</i> = 0.62) and 12-month (73.0 ± 12.8 points; <i>p</i> = 0.99) follow-up. However, patients without CA had a significantly increased risk of early loss of reduction and articular screw perforation (<i>p</i> = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Locked plating of proximal humeral fractures with trauma cement augmentation of humeral head screws could be translated from the ex-vivo lab setting into the clinical situation without additional complications. Locked plating of displaced PHF with additional cement augmentation showed similar clinical outcomes but reduced the rate of early implant-related complications compared to locked plating without additional CA.</p>","PeriodicalId":43682,"journal":{"name":"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand","volume":"13 2","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.\",\"authors\":\"J Christoph Katthagen,&nbsp;O Lutz,&nbsp;C Voigt,&nbsp;H Lill,&nbsp;A Ellwein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cement augmentation (CA) of humeral head screws in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) was found to be biomechanically beneficial. However, clinical outcomes of this treatment have not been well evaluated to date.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess outcomes of locked plating of PHF with additional CA and to compare them with outcomes of conventional locked plating without CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>24 patients (mean age, 74.2 ± 10.1 years; 22 female) with displaced PHF were prospectively enrolled and treated with locked plating and additional CA. The Constant score (CS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Simple Shoulder Value (SSV) were assessed 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Fracture healing and potential complications were evaluated on postoperative radiographs. The CS and complications were compared with the outcomes of a matched group of 24 patients (mean age, 73.9 ± 9.4 years; 22 female) with locked plating of displaced PHF without CA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 3‑month follow-up, the mean CS was 59.9 ± 15.6 points, the mean SST was 7.5 ± 2.7 points, and the mean SSV was 63.9 ± 21.7%. All scores significantly improved by the 12-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.05; CS, 72.9 ± 17.7; SST, 9.2 ± 3.2; SSV, 77.2 ± 17.3%). There were two cases (8%) of biological complications (<i>n</i> = 1 varus malunion and <i>n</i> = 1 humeral head necrosis). Compared with locked plating without CA, no significant differences were observed between the CS at the 3‑ (57.8 ± 13.4 points; <i>p</i> = 0.62) and 12-month (73.0 ± 12.8 points; <i>p</i> = 0.99) follow-up. However, patients without CA had a significantly increased risk of early loss of reduction and articular screw perforation (<i>p</i> = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Locked plating of proximal humeral fractures with trauma cement augmentation of humeral head screws could be translated from the ex-vivo lab setting into the clinical situation without additional complications. Locked plating of displaced PHF with additional cement augmentation showed similar clinical outcomes but reduced the rate of early implant-related complications compared to locked plating without additional CA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"123-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obere Extremitaet-Schulter-Ellenbogen-Hand-Upper Extremity-Shoulder Elbow Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

背景:肱骨头螺钉的水泥增强(CA)在肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板(PHF)中被发现具有生物力学上的益处。然而,到目前为止,这种治疗的临床结果还没有得到很好的评估。目的:评价外加CA的PHF锁定镀的疗效,并将其与不加CA的常规锁定镀的疗效进行比较。方法:24例患者(平均年龄74.2 ±10.1岁;前瞻性纳入22名女性患者,接受锁定钢板和额外CA治疗。术后3个月和12个月评估恒定评分(CS)、简单肩关节测试(SST)和简单肩关节值(SSV)。术后x线片评估骨折愈合及潜在并发症。将CS和并发症与匹配组24例患者的结果进行比较(平均年龄73.9 ±9.4岁;结果:随访3个月,平均CS为59.9 ±15.6分,平均SST为7.5 ±2.7分,平均SSV为63.9 ±21.7%。随访12个月,各评分均显著提高(p n = 1例内翻畸形愈合,n = 1例肱骨头坏死)。与无CA的锁定钢板相比,CS在3 -(57.8 ±13.4)点无显著差异;P = 0.62)和12个月(73.0 ±12.8分;P = 0.99)随访。然而,没有CA的患者早期复位丢失和关节螺钉穿孔的风险显著增加(p = 0.037)。结论:创伤骨水泥肱骨头固定螺钉锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折可从离体实验室转入临床,无其他并发症。与不加CA的锁定钢板相比,移位PHF加水泥增强的锁定钢板显示出相似的临床结果,但减少了早期种植体相关并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.

Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.

Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.

Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures.

Background: Cement augmentation (CA) of humeral head screws in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) was found to be biomechanically beneficial. However, clinical outcomes of this treatment have not been well evaluated to date.

Objectives: To assess outcomes of locked plating of PHF with additional CA and to compare them with outcomes of conventional locked plating without CA.

Methods: 24 patients (mean age, 74.2 ± 10.1 years; 22 female) with displaced PHF were prospectively enrolled and treated with locked plating and additional CA. The Constant score (CS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Simple Shoulder Value (SSV) were assessed 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Fracture healing and potential complications were evaluated on postoperative radiographs. The CS and complications were compared with the outcomes of a matched group of 24 patients (mean age, 73.9 ± 9.4 years; 22 female) with locked plating of displaced PHF without CA.

Results: At the 3‑month follow-up, the mean CS was 59.9 ± 15.6 points, the mean SST was 7.5 ± 2.7 points, and the mean SSV was 63.9 ± 21.7%. All scores significantly improved by the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.05; CS, 72.9 ± 17.7; SST, 9.2 ± 3.2; SSV, 77.2 ± 17.3%). There were two cases (8%) of biological complications (n = 1 varus malunion and n = 1 humeral head necrosis). Compared with locked plating without CA, no significant differences were observed between the CS at the 3‑ (57.8 ± 13.4 points; p = 0.62) and 12-month (73.0 ± 12.8 points; p = 0.99) follow-up. However, patients without CA had a significantly increased risk of early loss of reduction and articular screw perforation (p = 0.037).

Conclusion: Locked plating of proximal humeral fractures with trauma cement augmentation of humeral head screws could be translated from the ex-vivo lab setting into the clinical situation without additional complications. Locked plating of displaced PHF with additional cement augmentation showed similar clinical outcomes but reduced the rate of early implant-related complications compared to locked plating without additional CA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Zielsetzung der Zeitschrift Die Zeitschrift Obere Extremität widmet sich der Versorgung von Verletzungen, Verletzungsfolgen und Erkrankungen im Bereich des Schulter- und des Ellenbogengelenks. Frei eingereichte Originalien präsentieren Forschungsergebnisse aktueller Studien im Bereich der Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie und fördern den wissenschaftlichen Austausch. Vielversprechende Studien, die derzeit durchgeführt werden, sind ebenso willkommen, wie Langzeitstudien, die bewährte Verfahren auf den Prüfstand stellen. Fallberichte beleuchten seltene Indikationen und schildern ungewöhnliche Behandlungsverläufe. Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht gesichertes Wissen mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit in der Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie. Zusätzlich wird in speziellen Rubriken über innovative Behandlungsmaßnahmen, Probleme in der Begutachtung, berufspolitische Entwicklungen und Kongressaktivitäten berichtet. Als gemeinsames Kommunikations- und Weiterbildungsforum für alle Chirurg*innen und Orthopäd*innen mit entsprechender Spezialisierung ist die Zeitschrift Obere Extremität zukunftsorientiert und schließt eine wichtige Lücke im orthopädisch-unfallchirurgischen Informationsangebot. Aims & scope The journal Obere Extremität (Upper Extremity) is dedicated to the treatment of injuries, consequences of injuries and diseases in the area of the shoulder and elbow joint. Freely submitted originals present research results of current studies in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery and promote scientific exchange. Promising studies that are currently being carried out are welcome, as are long-term studies that put proven procedures to the test. Case reports illuminate rare indications and describe unusual courses of treatment. Comprehensive reviews on a current focus topic are the core of each issue. The focus is on secured knowledge with high relevance for the daily work in shoulder and elbow surgery. In addition, special sections report on innovative treatment measures, problems in assessment, professional policy developments and congress activities. As a joint communication and further education forum for all surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons with appropriate specialisation, the journal Obere Extremität is future-oriented and closes an important gap in the orthopaedic trauma surgery information offer. Begutachtung / Peer Review Alle Beiträge, die bei der Zeitschrift Obere Extremität eingereicht werden (einschließlich der eingeladenen Manuskripte) durchlaufen ein Doppelblind-Peer-Review-Verfahren, an dem mindestens zwei unabhängige Experten beteiligt sind.--- All manuscripts submitted to the journal Obere Extremität (including invited manuscripts) undergo a double-blind peer review process involving at least two independent experts. Ethische Richtlinien / Best Practice Guidelines and Publication Ethics Die Zeitschrift Obere Extremität folgt den Richtlinien des Komitees für Publikationsethik (COPE). Autoren wird empfohlen, klinische Studien, die sie zur Veröffentlichung in Betracht ziehen, vor der Veröffentlichung in kostenlosen, öffentlichen Registern für klinische Studien (z.B. www.clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.ifpma.org, http://isrctn.org, www.germanctr.de/online-Register_de.html) zu registrieren. Die Register sind nach den Richtlinien des International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) zu genehmigen. Die Autor*innen sollten am Ende ihres Abstracts den Namen des Studienregisters und ihre Registriernummer für klinische Studien angeben. The journal Obere Extremität (Upper Extremity) follows the Committee of Publications Ethics (COPE) - Guidelines. Authors are recommended to register clinical trials they consider for publication in free, public clinical trial registries (e.g., www.clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.ifpma.org, http://isrctn.org, www.germanctr.de/online-Register_de.html) before publication. The registries are to be approved by the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Authors should include the name of the trial register and their clinical trial registration number at the end of their abstract. Deklaration von Helsinki / Declaration of Helsinki Alle zur Veröffentlichung eingereichten Manuskripte, die Ergebnisse von Studien an Proband*innen oder Patient*innen präsentieren, müssen gemäß den Autorenrichtlinien für Originalarbeiten der Deklaration von Helsinki entsprechen. All Manuscripts submitted for publication presenting results from studies on probands or patients must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki according to the author guidelines for original papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信