卫生信息交换使用(1990-2015):系统回顾。

Emily Beth Devine, Annette M Totten, Paul Gorman, Karen B Eden, Steven Kassakian, Susan Woods, Monica Daeges, Miranda Pappas, Marian McDonagh, William R Hersh
{"title":"卫生信息交换使用(1990-2015):系统回顾。","authors":"Emily Beth Devine,&nbsp;Annette M Totten,&nbsp;Paul Gorman,&nbsp;Karen B Eden,&nbsp;Steven Kassakian,&nbsp;Susan Woods,&nbsp;Monica Daeges,&nbsp;Miranda Pappas,&nbsp;Marian McDonagh,&nbsp;William R Hersh","doi":"10.5334/egems.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In June 2014, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology published a 10-year roadmap for the United States to achieve interoperability of electronic health records (EHR) by 2024. A key component of this strategy is the promotion of nationwide health information exchange (HIE). The 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provided significant investments to achieve HIE.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the use of HIE through 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases (1990 - 2015); reference lists; and tables of contents of journals not indexed in the databases searched. We extracted data describing study design, setting, geographic location, characteristics of HIE implementation, analysis, follow-up, and results. Study quality was dual-rated using pre-specified criteria and discrepancies resolved through consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 58 studies describing either level of use or primary uses of HIE. These were a mix of surveys, retrospective database analyses, descriptions of audit logs, and focus groups. Settings ranged from community-wide to multinational. Results suggest that HIE use has risen substantially over time, with 82% of non-federal hospitals exchanging information (2015), 38% of physician practices (2013), and 17-23% of long-term care facilities (2013). Statewide efforts, originally funded by HITECH, varied widely, with a small number of states providing the bulk of the data. Characteristics of greater use include the presence of an EHR, larger practice size, and larger market share of the health-system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of HIE in the United States is growing but is still limited. Opportunities remain for expansion. Characteristics of successful implementations may provide a path forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":72880,"journal":{"name":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5334/egems.249","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Beth Devine,&nbsp;Annette M Totten,&nbsp;Paul Gorman,&nbsp;Karen B Eden,&nbsp;Steven Kassakian,&nbsp;Susan Woods,&nbsp;Monica Daeges,&nbsp;Miranda Pappas,&nbsp;Marian McDonagh,&nbsp;William R Hersh\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/egems.249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In June 2014, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology published a 10-year roadmap for the United States to achieve interoperability of electronic health records (EHR) by 2024. A key component of this strategy is the promotion of nationwide health information exchange (HIE). The 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provided significant investments to achieve HIE.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the use of HIE through 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases (1990 - 2015); reference lists; and tables of contents of journals not indexed in the databases searched. We extracted data describing study design, setting, geographic location, characteristics of HIE implementation, analysis, follow-up, and results. Study quality was dual-rated using pre-specified criteria and discrepancies resolved through consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 58 studies describing either level of use or primary uses of HIE. These were a mix of surveys, retrospective database analyses, descriptions of audit logs, and focus groups. Settings ranged from community-wide to multinational. Results suggest that HIE use has risen substantially over time, with 82% of non-federal hospitals exchanging information (2015), 38% of physician practices (2013), and 17-23% of long-term care facilities (2013). Statewide efforts, originally funded by HITECH, varied widely, with a small number of states providing the bulk of the data. Characteristics of greater use include the presence of an EHR, larger practice size, and larger market share of the health-system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of HIE in the United States is growing but is still limited. Opportunities remain for expansion. Characteristics of successful implementations may provide a path forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EGEMS (Washington, DC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5334/egems.249\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EGEMS (Washington, DC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGEMS (Washington, DC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

背景:2014年6月,国家卫生信息技术协调员办公室发布了美国到2024年实现电子健康记录(EHR)互操作性的10年路线图。这一战略的一个关键组成部分是促进全国卫生信息交流。2009年《卫生信息技术促进经济和临床健康法》(HITECH)为实现HIE提供了大量投资。目的:我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以描述到2015年HIE的使用情况。方法:检索MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane数据库(1990 - 2015);引用列表;以及未在检索数据库中编入索引的期刊目录。我们提取了描述研究设计、设置、地理位置、HIE实施特征、分析、随访和结果的数据。采用预先指定的标准对研究质量进行双重评价,并通过共识解决差异。结果:我们确定了58项研究描述了HIE的使用水平或主要使用情况。这些是调查、回顾性数据库分析、审计日志描述和焦点小组的混合。设置范围从社区范围到跨国公司。结果表明,随着时间的推移,HIE的使用大幅增加,82%的非联邦医院交换信息(2015年),38%的医生实践(2013年),17% -23%的长期护理机构(2013年)。最初由HITECH资助的全州范围内的努力差异很大,少数几个州提供了大量数据。更多使用的特征包括电子病历的存在、更大的实践规模和更大的卫生系统市场份额。结论:HIE在美国的使用正在增长,但仍然有限。扩张的机会依然存在。成功实现的特征可能提供前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.

Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.

Background: In June 2014, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology published a 10-year roadmap for the United States to achieve interoperability of electronic health records (EHR) by 2024. A key component of this strategy is the promotion of nationwide health information exchange (HIE). The 2009 Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provided significant investments to achieve HIE.

Objective: We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the use of HIE through 2015.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases (1990 - 2015); reference lists; and tables of contents of journals not indexed in the databases searched. We extracted data describing study design, setting, geographic location, characteristics of HIE implementation, analysis, follow-up, and results. Study quality was dual-rated using pre-specified criteria and discrepancies resolved through consensus.

Results: We identified 58 studies describing either level of use or primary uses of HIE. These were a mix of surveys, retrospective database analyses, descriptions of audit logs, and focus groups. Settings ranged from community-wide to multinational. Results suggest that HIE use has risen substantially over time, with 82% of non-federal hospitals exchanging information (2015), 38% of physician practices (2013), and 17-23% of long-term care facilities (2013). Statewide efforts, originally funded by HITECH, varied widely, with a small number of states providing the bulk of the data. Characteristics of greater use include the presence of an EHR, larger practice size, and larger market share of the health-system.

Conclusions: Use of HIE in the United States is growing but is still limited. Opportunities remain for expansion. Characteristics of successful implementations may provide a path forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信