闭式手术-正畸入路后腭、颊阻生犬的长期牙周状况。

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2017-09-27 eCollection Date: 2017-04-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162
P Bollero, C Danesi, M R Ricchiuti, A Milazzo, G Mampieri, C Agrestini, M Mucedero
{"title":"闭式手术-正畸入路后腭、颊阻生犬的长期牙周状况。","authors":"P Bollero,&nbsp;C Danesi,&nbsp;M R Ricchiuti,&nbsp;A Milazzo,&nbsp;G Mampieri,&nbsp;C Agrestini,&nbsp;M Mucedero","doi":"10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the periodontal status of palatally and buccally impacted canines exposed with closed technique, and to compare them with the controlateral canines that served as control teeth as well as to compare them each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>28 patients, 14 with unilateral palatally impacted canines and 14 with unilateral buccally impacted canines comprised the subjects of the study. Mean recall observational period was 2 years 4 months ± 1 year 1 month. Closed eruption technique without the tunnel was performed to expose both the palatally and the buccally impacted canines. Six periodontal variables were considered: probing pocket depth (PPD); width of keratinized tissue (KT); gingival thickness (GT); plaque index (PI); gingival bleeding index (GBI); gingival recession (REC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Palatally impacted canines exhibited significant greater PPD on the mesiolingual site compared to their controlaterals (P<0.05). Buccally impacted canines had significant increased KT compared to their contralaterals (P<0.05). Palatally impacted canines had significant greater PPD on the midbuccal site and on all the palatal sites when compared to the buccally impacted canines (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The changes observed in the periodontal status of impacted canines, although statistically significant, did not reach clinical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"10 2","pages":"162-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term periodontal status of palatally and buccally impacted canines after closed surgical-orthodontic approach.\",\"authors\":\"P Bollero,&nbsp;C Danesi,&nbsp;M R Ricchiuti,&nbsp;A Milazzo,&nbsp;G Mampieri,&nbsp;C Agrestini,&nbsp;M Mucedero\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the periodontal status of palatally and buccally impacted canines exposed with closed technique, and to compare them with the controlateral canines that served as control teeth as well as to compare them each other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>28 patients, 14 with unilateral palatally impacted canines and 14 with unilateral buccally impacted canines comprised the subjects of the study. Mean recall observational period was 2 years 4 months ± 1 year 1 month. Closed eruption technique without the tunnel was performed to expose both the palatally and the buccally impacted canines. Six periodontal variables were considered: probing pocket depth (PPD); width of keratinized tissue (KT); gingival thickness (GT); plaque index (PI); gingival bleeding index (GBI); gingival recession (REC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Palatally impacted canines exhibited significant greater PPD on the mesiolingual site compared to their controlaterals (P<0.05). Buccally impacted canines had significant increased KT compared to their contralaterals (P<0.05). Palatally impacted canines had significant greater PPD on the midbuccal site and on all the palatal sites when compared to the buccally impacted canines (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The changes observed in the periodontal status of impacted canines, although statistically significant, did not reach clinical significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"162-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.2.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

前言:本研究的目的是评价封闭技术暴露的上颌和颊侧阻生犬的牙周状况,并将其与作为对照牙的对照犬进行比较,并相互比较。方法:选取单侧腭阻生犬14例,单侧颊阻生犬14例,共28例。平均回忆观察期为2年4个月±1年1个月。采用不带隧道的闭式露牙技术,暴露腭侧和颊侧阻生牙。考虑了六个牙周变量:探测袋深度(PPD);角化组织宽度(KT);牙龈厚度(GT);斑块指数(PI);牙龈出血指数(GBI);牙龈萎缩(REC)结果:上颌阻生犬中舌部的PPD明显高于对照侧(p)。结论:阻生犬牙周状态的变化虽有统计学意义,但未达到临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term periodontal status of palatally and buccally impacted canines after closed surgical-orthodontic approach.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the periodontal status of palatally and buccally impacted canines exposed with closed technique, and to compare them with the controlateral canines that served as control teeth as well as to compare them each other.

Methods: 28 patients, 14 with unilateral palatally impacted canines and 14 with unilateral buccally impacted canines comprised the subjects of the study. Mean recall observational period was 2 years 4 months ± 1 year 1 month. Closed eruption technique without the tunnel was performed to expose both the palatally and the buccally impacted canines. Six periodontal variables were considered: probing pocket depth (PPD); width of keratinized tissue (KT); gingival thickness (GT); plaque index (PI); gingival bleeding index (GBI); gingival recession (REC).

Results: Palatally impacted canines exhibited significant greater PPD on the mesiolingual site compared to their controlaterals (P<0.05). Buccally impacted canines had significant increased KT compared to their contralaterals (P<0.05). Palatally impacted canines had significant greater PPD on the midbuccal site and on all the palatal sites when compared to the buccally impacted canines (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The changes observed in the periodontal status of impacted canines, although statistically significant, did not reach clinical significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信