{"title":"重新想象长期护理的风险。","authors":"Allison K Hoffman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>U.S. law and policy on long-term care fail to address the insecurity\nAmerican families face due to prolonged illness and disability-a problem that\ngrows more serious as the population ages and rates of disability rise. This\nArticle argues that, even worse, we have focused on only part of the problem. It\nilluminates two ways that prolonged disability or illness can create insecurity.\nThe first arises from the risk of becoming disabled or sick and needing long-term\ncare, which could be called \"care-recipient\" risk. The second arises out of the\nrisk of becoming responsible for someone else's care, which I call \"next-friend\"\nrisk. The law and social welfare policy has focused on the first, but this Article\nargues that the second equally threatens the wellbeing of American families.\nWhile attempting to mitigate care-recipient risk, in fact, the law has steadily\nexpanded next-friend risk, by reinforcing a structure of long-term care that relies\nheavily on informal caregiving. Millions of informal caregivers face financial\nand nonmonetary harms that deeply threaten their own long-term security. These\nharms are disproportionately experienced by people who are already\nvulnerable-women, minorities, and the poor. Scholars and policymakers have\ncatalogued and critiqued these costs but treat them as an unfortunate byproduct of\nan inevitable system of informal care.\nThis Article argues that if we, instead, understand becoming responsible for\nthe care of another as a social risk-just as we see the chance that a person will\nneed long-term care as a risk-it could fundamentally shift the way we approach\nlong-term care policy. In risk-theory terms, this Article proposes we reimagine\nthe risk of long-term care.</p>","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"16 2","pages":"147-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining the Risk of Long-Term Care.\",\"authors\":\"Allison K Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>U.S. law and policy on long-term care fail to address the insecurity\\nAmerican families face due to prolonged illness and disability-a problem that\\ngrows more serious as the population ages and rates of disability rise. This\\nArticle argues that, even worse, we have focused on only part of the problem. It\\nilluminates two ways that prolonged disability or illness can create insecurity.\\nThe first arises from the risk of becoming disabled or sick and needing long-term\\ncare, which could be called \\\"care-recipient\\\" risk. The second arises out of the\\nrisk of becoming responsible for someone else's care, which I call \\\"next-friend\\\"\\nrisk. The law and social welfare policy has focused on the first, but this Article\\nargues that the second equally threatens the wellbeing of American families.\\nWhile attempting to mitigate care-recipient risk, in fact, the law has steadily\\nexpanded next-friend risk, by reinforcing a structure of long-term care that relies\\nheavily on informal caregiving. Millions of informal caregivers face financial\\nand nonmonetary harms that deeply threaten their own long-term security. These\\nharms are disproportionately experienced by people who are already\\nvulnerable-women, minorities, and the poor. Scholars and policymakers have\\ncatalogued and critiqued these costs but treat them as an unfortunate byproduct of\\nan inevitable system of informal care.\\nThis Article argues that if we, instead, understand becoming responsible for\\nthe care of another as a social risk-just as we see the chance that a person will\\nneed long-term care as a risk-it could fundamentally shift the way we approach\\nlong-term care policy. In risk-theory terms, this Article proposes we reimagine\\nthe risk of long-term care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"147-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
U.S. law and policy on long-term care fail to address the insecurity
American families face due to prolonged illness and disability-a problem that
grows more serious as the population ages and rates of disability rise. This
Article argues that, even worse, we have focused on only part of the problem. It
illuminates two ways that prolonged disability or illness can create insecurity.
The first arises from the risk of becoming disabled or sick and needing long-term
care, which could be called "care-recipient" risk. The second arises out of the
risk of becoming responsible for someone else's care, which I call "next-friend"
risk. The law and social welfare policy has focused on the first, but this Article
argues that the second equally threatens the wellbeing of American families.
While attempting to mitigate care-recipient risk, in fact, the law has steadily
expanded next-friend risk, by reinforcing a structure of long-term care that relies
heavily on informal caregiving. Millions of informal caregivers face financial
and nonmonetary harms that deeply threaten their own long-term security. These
harms are disproportionately experienced by people who are already
vulnerable-women, minorities, and the poor. Scholars and policymakers have
catalogued and critiqued these costs but treat them as an unfortunate byproduct of
an inevitable system of informal care.
This Article argues that if we, instead, understand becoming responsible for
the care of another as a social risk-just as we see the chance that a person will
need long-term care as a risk-it could fundamentally shift the way we approach
long-term care policy. In risk-theory terms, this Article proposes we reimagine
the risk of long-term care.