腹股沟疝切开术后急性和慢性疼痛的相关因素。

Q2 Medicine
Elif Erdogan, Ecder Ozenc
{"title":"腹股沟疝切开术后急性和慢性疼痛的相关因素。","authors":"Elif Erdogan,&nbsp;Ecder Ozenc","doi":"10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.oze","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between types of anaesthesia, patients' demographic variables, preoperative emotional states and the prevalence of postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this randomized prospective study, postoperative pain was assessed in 100 patients, who were ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologist) I-II and between 18-65 years old, undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy with either general or spinal anaesthesia. In addition, postoperative pain compared with patients' demographic properties and psychological conditions in each group was also considered. Acute pain was evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24<sup>th</sup> hours with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and chronic neuropathic pain was at 1, 2 and 3<sup>rd</sup> months with Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4). All patients were treated with the same analgesics after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group spinal anaesthesia had lower acute pain at 1 and 2<sup>nd</sup> hours but they felt more severe pain at the 24<sup>th</sup> hour. Also patients' anxieties were correlated with acute and chronic postoperative pain. Ten patients complained about postoperative chronic pain after 3 months and there was no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spinal anaesthesia decreased acute pain intensity at the first postoperative hours. Patients with anxiety felt high pain levels and they had an increased chronic pain prevalence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21279,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","volume":"25 1","pages":"31-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.oze","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with acute and chronic pain after inguinal herniorraphy.\",\"authors\":\"Elif Erdogan,&nbsp;Ecder Ozenc\",\"doi\":\"10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.oze\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between types of anaesthesia, patients' demographic variables, preoperative emotional states and the prevalence of postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this randomized prospective study, postoperative pain was assessed in 100 patients, who were ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologist) I-II and between 18-65 years old, undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy with either general or spinal anaesthesia. In addition, postoperative pain compared with patients' demographic properties and psychological conditions in each group was also considered. Acute pain was evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24<sup>th</sup> hours with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and chronic neuropathic pain was at 1, 2 and 3<sup>rd</sup> months with Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4). All patients were treated with the same analgesics after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group spinal anaesthesia had lower acute pain at 1 and 2<sup>nd</sup> hours but they felt more severe pain at the 24<sup>th</sup> hour. Also patients' anxieties were correlated with acute and chronic postoperative pain. Ten patients complained about postoperative chronic pain after 3 months and there was no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spinal anaesthesia decreased acute pain intensity at the first postoperative hours. Patients with anxiety felt high pain levels and they had an increased chronic pain prevalence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"31-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.oze\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.oze\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21454/rjaic.7518.251.oze","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是分析麻醉类型、患者人口统计学变量、术前情绪状态与术后疼痛发生率之间的关系。方法:在这项随机前瞻性研究中,评估了100例患者的术后疼痛,这些患者均为ASA(美国麻醉学会)I-II级,年龄在18-65岁之间,接受腹股沟疝修补术,全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉。此外,还考虑了术后疼痛与各组患者人口学特征和心理状况的比较。急性疼痛在1、2、4、6、12和24小时用数值评定量表(NRS)评估,慢性神经性疼痛在1、2和3个月用双重神经性4题(DN4)评估。所有患者术后均使用相同的镇痛药。结果:脊髓麻醉组在第1、2小时的急性疼痛较轻,但在第24小时疼痛较重。此外,患者的焦虑与术后急性和慢性疼痛相关。10例患者术后3个月出现慢性疼痛,组间差异无统计学意义。结论:脊髓麻醉可减轻术后1小时急性疼痛强度。焦虑患者感到疼痛水平高,慢性疼痛患病率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with acute and chronic pain after inguinal herniorraphy.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between types of anaesthesia, patients' demographic variables, preoperative emotional states and the prevalence of postoperative pain.

Method: In this randomized prospective study, postoperative pain was assessed in 100 patients, who were ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologist) I-II and between 18-65 years old, undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy with either general or spinal anaesthesia. In addition, postoperative pain compared with patients' demographic properties and psychological conditions in each group was also considered. Acute pain was evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24th hours with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and chronic neuropathic pain was at 1, 2 and 3rd months with Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4). All patients were treated with the same analgesics after operation.

Results: Group spinal anaesthesia had lower acute pain at 1 and 2nd hours but they felt more severe pain at the 24th hour. Also patients' anxieties were correlated with acute and chronic postoperative pain. Ten patients complained about postoperative chronic pain after 3 months and there was no significant difference between groups.

Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia decreased acute pain intensity at the first postoperative hours. Patients with anxiety felt high pain levels and they had an increased chronic pain prevalence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is the official journal of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and has been published continuously since 1994. It is intended mainly for anaesthesia and intensive care providers, but it is also aimed at specialists in emergency medical care and in pain research and management. The Journal is indexed in Scopus, Embase, PubMed Central as well as the databases of the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research (CNCSIS) B+ category. The Journal publishes two issues per year, the first one in April and the second one in October, and contains original articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, book reviews and commentaries. The Journal is distributed free of charge to the members of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信