益生菌菌株调节母鸭肠道菌群和脂质代谢。

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology
Open Microbiology Journal Pub Date : 2018-04-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874285801812010071
Maxime Even, Stéphane Davail, Mikael Rey, Annabelle Tavernier, Marianne Houssier, Marie Dominique Bernadet, Karine Gontier, Géraldine Pascal, Karine Ricaud
{"title":"益生菌菌株调节母鸭肠道菌群和脂质代谢。","authors":"Maxime Even,&nbsp;Stéphane Davail,&nbsp;Mikael Rey,&nbsp;Annabelle Tavernier,&nbsp;Marianne Houssier,&nbsp;Marie Dominique Bernadet,&nbsp;Karine Gontier,&nbsp;Géraldine Pascal,&nbsp;Karine Ricaud","doi":"10.2174/1874285801812010071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Livestock production should respond to societal, environmental and economic changes. Since 2006 and the ban on antibiotics as growth factors in European Union, the use of probiotics has become widespread and has demonstrated the effect of intestinal microbiota on the performance of farm animals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementation with <i>Lactobacillus salivarius</i> (as a probiotics strain or combined with other strains) on zootechnical performance, metabolic and immune gene expression and intestinal microbiota diversity in mule ducks using high-throughput sequencing and real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The mule ducks were reared for 79 days and overfed for 12 days with or without probiotics. Samples were collected at 14 (starting period) and 91 days (end of overfeeding period), 3 hours post feeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of digestive content, age, level of feed intake or supplementation with probiotics, <i>Firmicutes</i>, <i>Proteobacteria</i> and <i>Bacteroidetes</i> were the dominant phyla in the bacterial community in mule ducks. At 14 days, both the ileal and cecal samples were dominated by <i>Firmicutes</i> (in particular the <i>Clostridiales</i> order). Overfeeding induced a shift between <i>Clostridiales</i> and <i>Lactobacillales</i> in the ileal samples whereas in the cecal samples, the relative abundance of <i>Firmicutes</i> decreased. Overfeeding also induced hepatic over-expression of Fatty Acid Synthase (<i>FAS</i>) and of the lipid transporter gene Fatty Acid Binding Protein 4 (<i>FABP4</i>). This increase in lipid metabolism genes is associated with a decrease in inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Finally, probiotic supplementation had only a slight impact on gene expression and microbiota diversity, both at 14 days and after overfeeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":38953,"journal":{"name":"Open Microbiology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874285801812010071","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probiotics Strains Modulate Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Mule Ducks.\",\"authors\":\"Maxime Even,&nbsp;Stéphane Davail,&nbsp;Mikael Rey,&nbsp;Annabelle Tavernier,&nbsp;Marianne Houssier,&nbsp;Marie Dominique Bernadet,&nbsp;Karine Gontier,&nbsp;Géraldine Pascal,&nbsp;Karine Ricaud\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874285801812010071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Livestock production should respond to societal, environmental and economic changes. Since 2006 and the ban on antibiotics as growth factors in European Union, the use of probiotics has become widespread and has demonstrated the effect of intestinal microbiota on the performance of farm animals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementation with <i>Lactobacillus salivarius</i> (as a probiotics strain or combined with other strains) on zootechnical performance, metabolic and immune gene expression and intestinal microbiota diversity in mule ducks using high-throughput sequencing and real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The mule ducks were reared for 79 days and overfed for 12 days with or without probiotics. Samples were collected at 14 (starting period) and 91 days (end of overfeeding period), 3 hours post feeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Irrespective of digestive content, age, level of feed intake or supplementation with probiotics, <i>Firmicutes</i>, <i>Proteobacteria</i> and <i>Bacteroidetes</i> were the dominant phyla in the bacterial community in mule ducks. At 14 days, both the ileal and cecal samples were dominated by <i>Firmicutes</i> (in particular the <i>Clostridiales</i> order). Overfeeding induced a shift between <i>Clostridiales</i> and <i>Lactobacillales</i> in the ileal samples whereas in the cecal samples, the relative abundance of <i>Firmicutes</i> decreased. Overfeeding also induced hepatic over-expression of Fatty Acid Synthase (<i>FAS</i>) and of the lipid transporter gene Fatty Acid Binding Protein 4 (<i>FABP4</i>). This increase in lipid metabolism genes is associated with a decrease in inflammatory response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Finally, probiotic supplementation had only a slight impact on gene expression and microbiota diversity, both at 14 days and after overfeeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Microbiology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874285801812010071\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Microbiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801812010071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Immunology and Microbiology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Microbiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801812010071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:畜牧业生产应响应社会、环境和经济的变化。自2006年欧盟禁止使用抗生素作为生长因子以来,益生菌的使用已变得广泛,并已证明肠道微生物群对农场动物生产性能的影响。目的:采用高通量测序和实时荧光定量PCR技术,研究饲粮中添加唾液乳杆菌(作为一种益生菌或与其他益生菌联合使用)对骡鸭动物生产性能、代谢和免疫基因表达及肠道菌群多样性的影响。方法:饲养79 d,分别饲喂和不饲喂益生菌12 d。分别于饲喂后第14天和第91天(过饲期结束)、3小时采集样品。结果:无论消化内容物、年龄、采食量或益生菌添加水平如何,厚壁菌门、变形菌门和拟杆菌门都是骡子鸭细菌群落的优势门。14 d时,回肠和盲肠样品均以厚壁菌门(尤其是梭菌门)为主。在回肠样品中,过度喂养导致梭菌门和乳酸杆菌门之间的转变,而在盲肠样品中,厚壁菌门的相对丰度下降。过量饲养还会引起肝脏脂肪酸合成酶(FAS)和脂质转运基因脂肪酸结合蛋白4 (FABP4)的过度表达。脂质代谢基因的增加与炎症反应的减少有关。结论:最后,益生菌补充对14 d和过量喂养后的基因表达和微生物群多样性均有轻微影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Probiotics Strains Modulate Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Mule Ducks.

Probiotics Strains Modulate Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Mule Ducks.

Probiotics Strains Modulate Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Mule Ducks.

Probiotics Strains Modulate Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Mule Ducks.

Background: Livestock production should respond to societal, environmental and economic changes. Since 2006 and the ban on antibiotics as growth factors in European Union, the use of probiotics has become widespread and has demonstrated the effect of intestinal microbiota on the performance of farm animals.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementation with Lactobacillus salivarius (as a probiotics strain or combined with other strains) on zootechnical performance, metabolic and immune gene expression and intestinal microbiota diversity in mule ducks using high-throughput sequencing and real-time PCR.

Method: The mule ducks were reared for 79 days and overfed for 12 days with or without probiotics. Samples were collected at 14 (starting period) and 91 days (end of overfeeding period), 3 hours post feeding.

Results: Irrespective of digestive content, age, level of feed intake or supplementation with probiotics, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla in the bacterial community in mule ducks. At 14 days, both the ileal and cecal samples were dominated by Firmicutes (in particular the Clostridiales order). Overfeeding induced a shift between Clostridiales and Lactobacillales in the ileal samples whereas in the cecal samples, the relative abundance of Firmicutes decreased. Overfeeding also induced hepatic over-expression of Fatty Acid Synthase (FAS) and of the lipid transporter gene Fatty Acid Binding Protein 4 (FABP4). This increase in lipid metabolism genes is associated with a decrease in inflammatory response.

Conclusion: Finally, probiotic supplementation had only a slight impact on gene expression and microbiota diversity, both at 14 days and after overfeeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Microbiology Journal
Open Microbiology Journal Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Open Microbiology Journal is a peer-reviewed open access journal which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, case studies, guest edited thematic issues and short communications/letters covering theoretical and practical aspects of Microbial systematics, evolutionary microbiology, immunology, virology, parasitology , bacteriology, mycology, phycology, protozoology, microbial ecology, molecular biology, microbial physiology, biochemistry, microbial pathogenesis, host-microbe interaction, systems microbiology, synthetic microbiology, bioinformatics. The Open Microbiology Journal , a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信