美国老年人晚期软组织肉瘤的治疗模式和生存率

Clinical Sarcoma Research Pub Date : 2018-05-03 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x
Rohan C Parikh, Maria Lorenzo, Lisa M Hess, Sean D Candrilli, Steven Nicol, James A Kaye
{"title":"美国老年人晚期软组织肉瘤的治疗模式和生存率","authors":"Rohan C Parikh,&nbsp;Maria Lorenzo,&nbsp;Lisa M Hess,&nbsp;Sean D Candrilli,&nbsp;Steven Nicol,&nbsp;James A Kaye","doi":"10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), across and by categories of specifically defined histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER. The study population comprised patients ≥ 65 years old with advanced STS (excluding osteosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) diagnosed from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4274 study patients, 2103 (49.2%) were male. Mean age was 77.8 years, and 1539 (36.0%) had distant disease at initial diagnosis. The most common histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (922[21.6%]), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (652[15.3%]), and liposarcoma (554[13.0%]). Overall, 1227 (28.7%) patients received first-line systemic therapy. Among these patients, 325 (26.5%) received docetaxel plus gemcitabine and 231 (18.8%) received doxorubicin alone. Only 476 patients received second-line therapy (11.1%), most commonly doxorubicin alone (n = 101). Median overall survival (95% confidence interval) from advanced STS diagnosis was 8.9 (8.3, 9.7) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although previous studies of younger populations reported anthracycline-based therapy predominated in first line, our study of older advanced STS patients found that docetaxel plus gemcitabine was most commonly used. Despite variation by histologic category, prognosis remains poor for older adult patients with advanced STS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment patterns and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.\",\"authors\":\"Rohan C Parikh,&nbsp;Maria Lorenzo,&nbsp;Lisa M Hess,&nbsp;Sean D Candrilli,&nbsp;Steven Nicol,&nbsp;James A Kaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), across and by categories of specifically defined histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER. The study population comprised patients ≥ 65 years old with advanced STS (excluding osteosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) diagnosed from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4274 study patients, 2103 (49.2%) were male. Mean age was 77.8 years, and 1539 (36.0%) had distant disease at initial diagnosis. The most common histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (922[21.6%]), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (652[15.3%]), and liposarcoma (554[13.0%]). Overall, 1227 (28.7%) patients received first-line systemic therapy. Among these patients, 325 (26.5%) received docetaxel plus gemcitabine and 231 (18.8%) received doxorubicin alone. Only 476 patients received second-line therapy (11.1%), most commonly doxorubicin alone (n = 101). Median overall survival (95% confidence interval) from advanced STS diagnosis was 8.9 (8.3, 9.7) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although previous studies of younger populations reported anthracycline-based therapy predominated in first line, our study of older advanced STS patients found that docetaxel plus gemcitabine was most commonly used. Despite variation by histologic category, prognosis remains poor for older adult patients with advanced STS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景:描述美国老年人晚期软组织肉瘤(STS)的患者和肿瘤特征、治疗和生存率,跨越并按特定定义的组织学亚型分类。方法:采用SEER进行回顾性队列分析。研究人群包括2001年1月1日至2011年12月31日诊断的≥65岁晚期STS(不包括骨肉瘤、卡波西肉瘤和胃肠道间质瘤)患者。结果:在4274例研究患者中,2103例(49.2%)为男性。平均年龄77.8岁,1539例(36.0%)初诊时有远处病变。最常见的组织学类型为平滑肌肉瘤(922例[21.6%])、未分化多形性肉瘤(652例[15.3%])和脂肪肉瘤(554例[13.0%])。总体而言,1227例(28.7%)患者接受了一线全身治疗。在这些患者中,325例(26.5%)接受多西他赛加吉西他滨治疗,231例(18.8%)单独接受阿霉素治疗。只有476名患者接受了二线治疗(11.1%),最常见的是单独使用阿霉素(n = 101)。晚期STS诊断的中位总生存期(95%置信区间)为8.9(8.3,9.7)个月。结论:尽管先前对年轻人群的研究报告了蒽环类药物为主的一线治疗,但我们对老年晚期STS患者的研究发现,多西他赛加吉西他滨最常用。尽管组织学类型不同,老年晚期STS患者的预后仍然很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Treatment patterns and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.

Treatment patterns and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.

Background: To describe patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), across and by categories of specifically defined histologic subtypes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER. The study population comprised patients ≥ 65 years old with advanced STS (excluding osteosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) diagnosed from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011.

Results: Of 4274 study patients, 2103 (49.2%) were male. Mean age was 77.8 years, and 1539 (36.0%) had distant disease at initial diagnosis. The most common histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (922[21.6%]), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (652[15.3%]), and liposarcoma (554[13.0%]). Overall, 1227 (28.7%) patients received first-line systemic therapy. Among these patients, 325 (26.5%) received docetaxel plus gemcitabine and 231 (18.8%) received doxorubicin alone. Only 476 patients received second-line therapy (11.1%), most commonly doxorubicin alone (n = 101). Median overall survival (95% confidence interval) from advanced STS diagnosis was 8.9 (8.3, 9.7) months.

Conclusions: Although previous studies of younger populations reported anthracycline-based therapy predominated in first line, our study of older advanced STS patients found that docetaxel plus gemcitabine was most commonly used. Despite variation by histologic category, prognosis remains poor for older adult patients with advanced STS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信