Bokai Wang, Pan Wu, Brian Kwan, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng
{"title":"辛普森悖论:例子。","authors":"Bokai Wang, Pan Wu, Brian Kwan, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simpson's paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson's paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"30 2","pages":"139-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/cd/sap-30-139.PMC5936043.pdf","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simpson's Paradox: Examples.\",\"authors\":\"Bokai Wang, Pan Wu, Brian Kwan, Xin M Tu, Changyong Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Simpson's paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson's paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"上海精神医学\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"139-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/cd/sap-30-139.PMC5936043.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"上海精神医学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.218026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simpson's paradox is very prevalent in many areas. It characterizes the inconsistency between the conditional and marginal interpretations of the data. In this paper, we illustrate through some examples how the Simpson's paradox can happen in continuous, categorical, and time-to-event data.
期刊介绍:
Shanghai archives of psychiatry (bimonthly) was founded in 1959 and is sponsored by Shanghai Mental Health Center. The journal is aimed at mental health workers across the country, including psychiatrists and nurses, clinical psychologists, social workers, and people who are committed to the cause of mental health. It focuses on reporting clinical research results and practical experience in the field of psychiatry, and introduces the latest knowledge in psychiatry and related fields. The columns include monographs, case reports, clinical case discussions, reviews, mental health and law, and debates and discussions.