印第安纳州各急诊科在遵守小儿糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理指南方面的差异:基于现场模拟的观察研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2018-04-24 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001494
Kamal Abulebda, Samer Abu-Sultaneh, Erin E White, Michele L Kirby, Brian C Phillips, Courtney T Frye, Lee D Murphy, Riad Lutfi
{"title":"印第安纳州各急诊科在遵守小儿糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理指南方面的差异:基于现场模拟的观察研究。","authors":"Kamal Abulebda, Samer Abu-Sultaneh, Erin E White, Michele L Kirby, Brian C Phillips, Courtney T Frye, Lee D Murphy, Riad Lutfi","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000001494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common presentation to an emergency department (ED), with the majority presenting to community EDs. Adherence to clinical guidelines in these EDs can reduce morbidity and mortality. Few methods to describe practice gaps for DKA management have been reported.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that high-fidelity in situ simulation can be used to measure and compare the quality of the care provided to pediatric patients with DKA presenting to community EDs in the state of Indiana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study examined multiprofessional teams caring for a simulated pediatric patient who presented with DKA to community EDs. The primary outcome was overall adherence to pediatric DKA guidelines as measured by a validated performance checklist. A composite adherence score (CAS) was calculated using the sum of 9 checklist performance parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of ED volume and characteristics on the scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 49 multiprofessional teams from 13 sites were enrolled. Of the 252 participants, 26 (10.3%) were physicians, 143 (56.7%) registered nurses, 25 (9.9%) respiratory therapists, and 58 (23.0%) were other. The overall CAS for all sites was 55.6% (25th, 75th interquartile range, 44.4%, 66.7%). Excessive intravenous fluid boluses were given by 53.1%, whereas 30.6% and 26.5% incorrectly administered insulin and sodium bicarbonate boluses, respectively. Only 10.2% used an appropriate intravenous fluid rate, and 57.1% performed an hourly glucose. No significant difference in the CAS was found due to pediatric ED volume or presence of an inpatient pediatric service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using validated in situ simulation; we revealed high variability in adherence to the pediatric DKA management guidelines at a wide range of community EDs. A statewide education initiative focused on decreasing variation and improving adherence to pediatric DKA guidelines is necessary for patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"e265-e269"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Adherence to Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management Guidelines Across a Spectrum of Emergency Departments in the State of Indiana: An Observational In Situ Simulation-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kamal Abulebda, Samer Abu-Sultaneh, Erin E White, Michele L Kirby, Brian C Phillips, Courtney T Frye, Lee D Murphy, Riad Lutfi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000001494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common presentation to an emergency department (ED), with the majority presenting to community EDs. Adherence to clinical guidelines in these EDs can reduce morbidity and mortality. Few methods to describe practice gaps for DKA management have been reported.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that high-fidelity in situ simulation can be used to measure and compare the quality of the care provided to pediatric patients with DKA presenting to community EDs in the state of Indiana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study examined multiprofessional teams caring for a simulated pediatric patient who presented with DKA to community EDs. The primary outcome was overall adherence to pediatric DKA guidelines as measured by a validated performance checklist. A composite adherence score (CAS) was calculated using the sum of 9 checklist performance parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of ED volume and characteristics on the scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 49 multiprofessional teams from 13 sites were enrolled. Of the 252 participants, 26 (10.3%) were physicians, 143 (56.7%) registered nurses, 25 (9.9%) respiratory therapists, and 58 (23.0%) were other. The overall CAS for all sites was 55.6% (25th, 75th interquartile range, 44.4%, 66.7%). Excessive intravenous fluid boluses were given by 53.1%, whereas 30.6% and 26.5% incorrectly administered insulin and sodium bicarbonate boluses, respectively. Only 10.2% used an appropriate intravenous fluid rate, and 57.1% performed an hourly glucose. No significant difference in the CAS was found due to pediatric ED volume or presence of an inpatient pediatric service.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using validated in situ simulation; we revealed high variability in adherence to the pediatric DKA management guidelines at a wide range of community EDs. A statewide education initiative focused on decreasing variation and improving adherence to pediatric DKA guidelines is necessary for patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e265-e269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)是急诊科(ED)的常见病,其中大多数患者在社区急诊科就诊。在这些急诊科遵守临床指南可以降低发病率和死亡率。目前还很少有报告称有方法可以描述 DKA 管理方面的实践差距:我们假设高保真原位模拟可用于衡量和比较印第安纳州社区急诊室为患有 DKA 的儿科患者提供的护理质量:这项观察性研究考察了多专业团队为社区急诊室的模拟儿科 DKA 患者提供护理的情况。主要结果是对儿科 DKA 指南的总体遵守情况,并通过有效的绩效检查表进行衡量。综合依从性评分(CAS)是根据 9 项核对表性能参数的总和计算得出的。多变量逻辑回归用于研究急诊室数量和特征对得分的影响:结果:来自 13 个医疗机构的 49 个多专业团队参与了这项研究。在 252 名参与者中,26 人(10.3%)为医生,143 人(56.7%)为注册护士,25 人(9.9%)为呼吸治疗师,58 人(23.0%)为其他人员。所有地点的总体 CAS 为 55.6%(第 25、75 次四分位数范围,44.4%,66.7%)。53.1%的患者静脉输液量过大,30.6%和26.5%的患者错误地注射了胰岛素和碳酸氢钠。只有 10.2% 的人使用了适当的静脉输液速度,57.1% 的人进行了每小时血糖检测。CAS没有因儿科急诊室容量或是否有儿科住院服务而出现明显差异:通过使用有效的原位模拟,我们发现在各种社区急诊室中,对儿科 DKA 管理指南的遵守情况存在很大差异。为了确保患者安全,有必要在全州范围内开展教育活动,重点是减少差异和提高对儿科 DKA 指南的遵守程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Adherence to Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management Guidelines Across a Spectrum of Emergency Departments in the State of Indiana: An Observational In Situ Simulation-Based Study.

Background: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common presentation to an emergency department (ED), with the majority presenting to community EDs. Adherence to clinical guidelines in these EDs can reduce morbidity and mortality. Few methods to describe practice gaps for DKA management have been reported.

Objectives: We hypothesized that high-fidelity in situ simulation can be used to measure and compare the quality of the care provided to pediatric patients with DKA presenting to community EDs in the state of Indiana.

Methods: This observational study examined multiprofessional teams caring for a simulated pediatric patient who presented with DKA to community EDs. The primary outcome was overall adherence to pediatric DKA guidelines as measured by a validated performance checklist. A composite adherence score (CAS) was calculated using the sum of 9 checklist performance parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of ED volume and characteristics on the scores.

Results: A 49 multiprofessional teams from 13 sites were enrolled. Of the 252 participants, 26 (10.3%) were physicians, 143 (56.7%) registered nurses, 25 (9.9%) respiratory therapists, and 58 (23.0%) were other. The overall CAS for all sites was 55.6% (25th, 75th interquartile range, 44.4%, 66.7%). Excessive intravenous fluid boluses were given by 53.1%, whereas 30.6% and 26.5% incorrectly administered insulin and sodium bicarbonate boluses, respectively. Only 10.2% used an appropriate intravenous fluid rate, and 57.1% performed an hourly glucose. No significant difference in the CAS was found due to pediatric ED volume or presence of an inpatient pediatric service.

Conclusions: Using validated in situ simulation; we revealed high variability in adherence to the pediatric DKA management guidelines at a wide range of community EDs. A statewide education initiative focused on decreasing variation and improving adherence to pediatric DKA guidelines is necessary for patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信