意大利南部林业工人的膜翅目蜇伤反应:我们的经验与报告数据相比较。

Q2 Medicine
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Pub Date : 2018-04-17 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6
Luisa Ricciardi, Francesco Papia, Giuseppe Cataldo, Mario Giorgianni, Giovanna Spatari, Sebastiano Gangemi
{"title":"意大利南部林业工人的膜翅目蜇伤反应:我们的经验与报告数据相比较。","authors":"Luisa Ricciardi,&nbsp;Francesco Papia,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cataldo,&nbsp;Mario Giorgianni,&nbsp;Giovanna Spatari,&nbsp;Sebastiano Gangemi","doi":"10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hymenoptera sting reactions are among life-threatening causes of allergy. Several epidemiology studies have assessed the risk of these kind of reactions, among the general population, around 3% of adults. This incidence increases among highly at risk populations such as outdoor workers. Hymenoptera stings among forestry workers (FW) are occupational triggers but it has not yet been well defined which is the real incidence of anaphylaxis in these workers, not even in Italy. Two Italian studies reported on the risk of hymenoptera stings (HS) in northern Italy (NI) and central Italy (CI) FW while no data is available on the prevalence in southern Italy (SI) ones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population of 341 SI FW (301 males and 40 females, mean age 51 years, range 43-63 years), who worked in Sicily, was investigated submitting a standardized questionnaire dealing with reactions to Hymenoptera stings, such as large local reactions (LLR) and systemic reactions (SR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HS occurred in 203 FW (59%) and caused reactions in 77 (22%); LLR occurred in 46 (13%) and SR in 31 (9%); SR were life threatening in 9/341 (3%) FW and were treated with epinephrine at the emergency unit as workers did not carry an epinephrine auto-injector. A SR at a subsequent HS followed a LLR in 21/46 FW (46%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FW in SI have a generic risk of HS anaphylaxis as in the general population but a higher risk of SR and LLR respect to forestry populations from different Italian geographical areas.SR among SI FW occurred in 9% of them, while published data report the incidence of SR around 2 and 4%, respectively, in the Centre and North Italy FW. The incidence of LLR in SI FW was also higher (13%) than in CI (2%) and NI (10%) ones. Previous LLR in our SI population represented a high risk factor for developing a SR and therefore a red flag for future anaphylaxis and prescription of an epinephrine auto-injector.</p>","PeriodicalId":38753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","volume":"16 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hymenoptera sting reactions in southern Italy forestry workers: our experience compared to reported data.\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Ricciardi,&nbsp;Francesco Papia,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cataldo,&nbsp;Mario Giorgianni,&nbsp;Giovanna Spatari,&nbsp;Sebastiano Gangemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hymenoptera sting reactions are among life-threatening causes of allergy. Several epidemiology studies have assessed the risk of these kind of reactions, among the general population, around 3% of adults. This incidence increases among highly at risk populations such as outdoor workers. Hymenoptera stings among forestry workers (FW) are occupational triggers but it has not yet been well defined which is the real incidence of anaphylaxis in these workers, not even in Italy. Two Italian studies reported on the risk of hymenoptera stings (HS) in northern Italy (NI) and central Italy (CI) FW while no data is available on the prevalence in southern Italy (SI) ones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population of 341 SI FW (301 males and 40 females, mean age 51 years, range 43-63 years), who worked in Sicily, was investigated submitting a standardized questionnaire dealing with reactions to Hymenoptera stings, such as large local reactions (LLR) and systemic reactions (SR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HS occurred in 203 FW (59%) and caused reactions in 77 (22%); LLR occurred in 46 (13%) and SR in 31 (9%); SR were life threatening in 9/341 (3%) FW and were treated with epinephrine at the emergency unit as workers did not carry an epinephrine auto-injector. A SR at a subsequent HS followed a LLR in 21/46 FW (46%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FW in SI have a generic risk of HS anaphylaxis as in the general population but a higher risk of SR and LLR respect to forestry populations from different Italian geographical areas.SR among SI FW occurred in 9% of them, while published data report the incidence of SR around 2 and 4%, respectively, in the Centre and North Italy FW. The incidence of LLR in SI FW was also higher (13%) than in CI (2%) and NI (10%) ones. Previous LLR in our SI population represented a high risk factor for developing a SR and therefore a red flag for future anaphylaxis and prescription of an epinephrine auto-injector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Molecular Allergy\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Molecular Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-018-0087-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:膜翅目昆虫蜇伤反应是危及生命的过敏原因之一。几项流行病学研究评估了这类反应的风险,在普通人群中,约占成年人的3%。这种发病率在高危人群中增加,如户外工作者。在林业工人(FW)中膜翅目昆虫蜇伤是职业诱因,但尚未很好地定义这些工人过敏反应的真实发生率,甚至在意大利也没有。意大利的两项研究报告了意大利北部(NI)和意大利中部(CI) FW的膜翅目蜇伤(HS)风险,而没有关于意大利南部(SI)流行率的数据。方法:对在西西里岛工作的341名外来务工人员(男性301人,女性40人,平均年龄43 ~ 63岁)进行问卷调查,问卷内容涉及对膜翅目昆虫蜇伤的反应,包括大局部反应(LLR)和全身反应(SR)。结果:203例FW发生HS(59%), 77例(22%)发生不良反应;LLR 46例(13%),SR 31例(9%);SR在9/341 (3%)FW中危及生命,由于工作人员没有携带肾上腺素自动注射器,因此在急诊室用肾上腺素治疗。在21/46 FW(46%)中,在随后的HS中发生SR,随后发生LLR。结论:SI中的FW与普通人群一样具有HS过敏反应的一般风险,但与意大利不同地理区域的林业人群相比,SR和LLR的风险更高。SI FW的SR发生率为9%,而已发表的数据显示,意大利中部和北部FW的SR发生率分别约为2%和4%。SI FW的LLR发生率(13%)也高于CI(2%)和NI(10%)。在我们的SI人群中,先前的LLR是发生SR的高风险因素,因此是未来过敏反应和肾上腺素自动注射器处方的危险信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hymenoptera sting reactions in southern Italy forestry workers: our experience compared to reported data.

Hymenoptera sting reactions in southern Italy forestry workers: our experience compared to reported data.

Background: Hymenoptera sting reactions are among life-threatening causes of allergy. Several epidemiology studies have assessed the risk of these kind of reactions, among the general population, around 3% of adults. This incidence increases among highly at risk populations such as outdoor workers. Hymenoptera stings among forestry workers (FW) are occupational triggers but it has not yet been well defined which is the real incidence of anaphylaxis in these workers, not even in Italy. Two Italian studies reported on the risk of hymenoptera stings (HS) in northern Italy (NI) and central Italy (CI) FW while no data is available on the prevalence in southern Italy (SI) ones.

Methods: A population of 341 SI FW (301 males and 40 females, mean age 51 years, range 43-63 years), who worked in Sicily, was investigated submitting a standardized questionnaire dealing with reactions to Hymenoptera stings, such as large local reactions (LLR) and systemic reactions (SR).

Results: HS occurred in 203 FW (59%) and caused reactions in 77 (22%); LLR occurred in 46 (13%) and SR in 31 (9%); SR were life threatening in 9/341 (3%) FW and were treated with epinephrine at the emergency unit as workers did not carry an epinephrine auto-injector. A SR at a subsequent HS followed a LLR in 21/46 FW (46%).

Conclusions: FW in SI have a generic risk of HS anaphylaxis as in the general population but a higher risk of SR and LLR respect to forestry populations from different Italian geographical areas.SR among SI FW occurred in 9% of them, while published data report the incidence of SR around 2 and 4%, respectively, in the Centre and North Italy FW. The incidence of LLR in SI FW was also higher (13%) than in CI (2%) and NI (10%) ones. Previous LLR in our SI population represented a high risk factor for developing a SR and therefore a red flag for future anaphylaxis and prescription of an epinephrine auto-injector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Molecular Allergy
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Molecular Allergy is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that publishes research on human allergic and immunodeficient disease (immune deficiency not related to HIV infection/AIDS). The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of the clinical, genetic, molecular and inflammatory aspects of allergic-respiratory (Type 1 hypersensitivity) and non-AIDS immunodeficiency disorders. However, studies of allergic/hypersensitive aspects of HIV infection/AIDS or drug desensitization protocols in AIDS are acceptable. At the basic science level, this includes original work and reviews on the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the inflammatory response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信