混合型胸腹主动脉瘤修复:未来在这里吗?

Journal of visualized surgery Pub Date : 2018-03-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14
Vicente Orozco-Sevilla, Scott A Weldon, Joseph S Coselli
{"title":"混合型胸腹主动脉瘤修复:未来在这里吗?","authors":"Vicente Orozco-Sevilla,&nbsp;Scott A Weldon,&nbsp;Joseph S Coselli","doi":"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair for more than 6 decades, but 2 additional options have emerged: total endovascular TAAA repair and a hybrid approach that combines open and endovascular repair. Despite the optimism for an endovascular approach, long-term results for these repairs are still lacking. Some of the issues with this emerging technology include the risk of paraplegia after extensive endovascular repair, the need for multiple reinterventions, continuous stent-graft surveillance, endograft branch stenosis, as well as the significant learning curve. Interest in a hybrid approach has resurged despite the non-superior results compared to open TAAA. Commonly, the focus of the hybrid approach is now on performing a less extensive open TAAA repair, which is then extended with a stent-graft or vice versa. Moreover, this approach is now often performed in two stages in an effort to decrease the associated spinal cord ischemia. Open surgical repair after endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being performed to address serious complications, such as infection or fistula, that cannot be repaired by further endovascular intervention. As with any new technology, there will be an increase in the number of procedure-related complications and a decrease in the number of surgeons who can perform the traditional open operation with good results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of visualized surgery","volume":"4 ","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is the future here?\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Orozco-Sevilla,&nbsp;Scott A Weldon,&nbsp;Joseph S Coselli\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair for more than 6 decades, but 2 additional options have emerged: total endovascular TAAA repair and a hybrid approach that combines open and endovascular repair. Despite the optimism for an endovascular approach, long-term results for these repairs are still lacking. Some of the issues with this emerging technology include the risk of paraplegia after extensive endovascular repair, the need for multiple reinterventions, continuous stent-graft surveillance, endograft branch stenosis, as well as the significant learning curve. Interest in a hybrid approach has resurged despite the non-superior results compared to open TAAA. Commonly, the focus of the hybrid approach is now on performing a less extensive open TAAA repair, which is then extended with a stent-graft or vice versa. Moreover, this approach is now often performed in two stages in an effort to decrease the associated spinal cord ischemia. Open surgical repair after endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being performed to address serious complications, such as infection or fistula, that cannot be repaired by further endovascular intervention. As with any new technology, there will be an increase in the number of procedure-related complications and a decrease in the number of surgeons who can perform the traditional open operation with good results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of visualized surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of visualized surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of visualized surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2018.02.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

60多年来,开放性手术一直是胸腹主动脉瘤(TAAA)修复的金标准,但出现了两种额外的选择:全血管内TAAA修复和开放和血管内修复相结合的混合方法。尽管对血管内手术方法持乐观态度,但这些修复的长期结果仍然缺乏。这项新兴技术的一些问题包括广泛血管内修复后截瘫的风险、多次再干预的需要、持续的支架移植物监测、移植物分支狭窄以及显著的学习曲线。尽管与开放式TAAA相比,混合型方法的效果并不好,但人们对混合型方法的兴趣已经重新高涨。通常,混合入路的重点是进行不太广泛的开放TAAA修复,然后通过支架移植物进行扩展,反之亦然。此外,这种方法现在通常分两个阶段进行,以减少相关的脊髓缺血。血管内主动脉修复后开放手术修复越来越多地用于解决严重并发症,如感染或瘘,无法通过进一步血管内干预修复。与任何新技术一样,与手术相关的并发症数量会增加,而能够进行传统开放手术并取得良好效果的外科医生数量会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is the future here?

Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is the future here?

Hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: is the future here?

Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair for more than 6 decades, but 2 additional options have emerged: total endovascular TAAA repair and a hybrid approach that combines open and endovascular repair. Despite the optimism for an endovascular approach, long-term results for these repairs are still lacking. Some of the issues with this emerging technology include the risk of paraplegia after extensive endovascular repair, the need for multiple reinterventions, continuous stent-graft surveillance, endograft branch stenosis, as well as the significant learning curve. Interest in a hybrid approach has resurged despite the non-superior results compared to open TAAA. Commonly, the focus of the hybrid approach is now on performing a less extensive open TAAA repair, which is then extended with a stent-graft or vice versa. Moreover, this approach is now often performed in two stages in an effort to decrease the associated spinal cord ischemia. Open surgical repair after endovascular aortic repair is increasingly being performed to address serious complications, such as infection or fistula, that cannot be repaired by further endovascular intervention. As with any new technology, there will be an increase in the number of procedure-related complications and a decrease in the number of surgeons who can perform the traditional open operation with good results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信