[在由两个群体组成的社会中能够维持普遍交换的利他行为的特征]。

Q4 Psychology
Ryoichi Onoda, Nobuyuki Takahashi
{"title":"[在由两个群体组成的社会中能够维持普遍交换的利他行为的特征]。","authors":"Ryoichi Onoda,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Takahashi","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.87.14080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies on generalized exchange have argued that group plays an important role in the emergence\nof cooperative society. To examine to what extent the role of a group is important, we conducted computer\nsimulations in which players decide whether to give resources to members of a society composed of two groups.\nWe examined whether a society consisting of any of the possible conceivable strategies (65536 strategies total)\ncould resist invasion by an unconditional defector (ALLD) and an unconditional cooperator (ALLC). The\nresults showed that universalist strategies, which give resources to both in-group members and out-group\nmembers equally, and in-group favoring strategies, which give resources to in-group members more than outgroup\nmembers, could resist invasion. Furthermore, we found that in-group favoring strategies could exclude\nALLC from the circle of resource flow more easily than universalist strategies. These results imply that it may be\nnecessary to employ an in-group favoring strategy that utilizes the group membership information of other people\nin order to maintain generalized exchange in a society composed of two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The characteristics of altruistic behavior that can sustain generalized exchange in a society composed of two groups].\",\"authors\":\"Ryoichi Onoda,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.4992/jjpsy.87.14080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies on generalized exchange have argued that group plays an important role in the emergence\\nof cooperative society. To examine to what extent the role of a group is important, we conducted computer\\nsimulations in which players decide whether to give resources to members of a society composed of two groups.\\nWe examined whether a society consisting of any of the possible conceivable strategies (65536 strategies total)\\ncould resist invasion by an unconditional defector (ALLD) and an unconditional cooperator (ALLC). The\\nresults showed that universalist strategies, which give resources to both in-group members and out-group\\nmembers equally, and in-group favoring strategies, which give resources to in-group members more than outgroup\\nmembers, could resist invasion. Furthermore, we found that in-group favoring strategies could exclude\\nALLC from the circle of resource flow more easily than universalist strategies. These results imply that it may be\\nnecessary to employ an in-group favoring strategy that utilizes the group membership information of other people\\nin order to maintain generalized exchange in a society composed of two groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往关于广义交换的研究认为,群体在合作社会的产生中起着重要作用。为了检验一个群体的角色在多大程度上是重要的,我们进行了计算机模拟,让玩家决定是否向由两个群体组成的社会成员提供资源。我们研究了一个由任何可能的可想象策略(65536个策略)组成的社会是否能够抵御无条件叛逆者(ALLD)和无条件合作者(ALLC)的入侵。结果表明,普遍主义策略(对内和对外给予同等资源)和内群体偏好策略(对内比外群体给予更多资源)均能抵御外来入侵。此外,我们发现群体内偏好策略比普遍主义策略更容易将企业排除在资源流动圈之外。这些结果表明,为了在一个由两个群体组成的社会中维持普遍的交换,可能有必要采用一种利用其他人的群体成员信息的群体内偏好策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The characteristics of altruistic behavior that can sustain generalized exchange in a society composed of two groups].

Previous studies on generalized exchange have argued that group plays an important role in the emergence of cooperative society. To examine to what extent the role of a group is important, we conducted computer simulations in which players decide whether to give resources to members of a society composed of two groups. We examined whether a society consisting of any of the possible conceivable strategies (65536 strategies total) could resist invasion by an unconditional defector (ALLD) and an unconditional cooperator (ALLC). The results showed that universalist strategies, which give resources to both in-group members and out-group members equally, and in-group favoring strategies, which give resources to in-group members more than outgroup members, could resist invasion. Furthermore, we found that in-group favoring strategies could exclude ALLC from the circle of resource flow more easily than universalist strategies. These results imply that it may be necessary to employ an in-group favoring strategy that utilizes the group membership information of other people in order to maintain generalized exchange in a society composed of two groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信