脑前动脉梭状动脉瘤栓塞前的刺激检测。

Q1 Medicine
Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2018-02-01 Epub Date: 2017-11-08 DOI:10.1159/000482012
Pouria Moshayedi, Dan-Victor Giurgiutiu, Andrew F Ducruet, Brian T Jankowitz, Ashutosh P Jadhav
{"title":"脑前动脉梭状动脉瘤栓塞前的刺激检测。","authors":"Pouria Moshayedi,&nbsp;Dan-Victor Giurgiutiu,&nbsp;Andrew F Ducruet,&nbsp;Brian T Jankowitz,&nbsp;Ashutosh P Jadhav","doi":"10.1159/000482012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000482012","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provocative Testing Prior to Anterior Cerebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm Embolization.\",\"authors\":\"Pouria Moshayedi,&nbsp;Dan-Victor Giurgiutiu,&nbsp;Andrew F Ducruet,&nbsp;Brian T Jankowitz,&nbsp;Ashutosh P Jadhav\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000482012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000482012\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000482012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000482012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们报告2例母动脉闭塞(PAO)为前脑动脉(ACA)梭状动脉瘤栓塞后进行超选择性刺激试验,以确认远端区域的生存能力。第一个病例涉及一名20岁的患者,他表现为蛛网膜下腔出血,在ACA远端进行球囊试验闭塞后行PAO,未发现神经生理变化。第二个病例涉及另一个40岁的患者,他表现为假性动脉瘤扩大,并在远端ACA输注阿莫巴比妥钠后接受PAO,但没有临床变化。两例患者均耐受PAO,无临床损害。刺激试验后的PAO可能是梭状动脉瘤治疗中一种安全有效的治疗策略。关键信息:超选择性球囊试验闭塞和阿莫巴比妥钠输注刺激试验都是在母血管闭塞前对脑组织进行临床和生理检查的可行选择。神经生理监测可能是刺激试验后临床检查的有用替代,特别是如果患者在全身麻醉下治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Provocative Testing Prior to Anterior Cerebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm Embolization.

Provocative Testing Prior to Anterior Cerebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm Embolization.

Provocative Testing Prior to Anterior Cerebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm Embolization.

We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.

Key messages: Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信