Pouria Moshayedi, Dan-Victor Giurgiutiu, Andrew F Ducruet, Brian T Jankowitz, Ashutosh P Jadhav
{"title":"脑前动脉梭状动脉瘤栓塞前的刺激检测。","authors":"Pouria Moshayedi, Dan-Victor Giurgiutiu, Andrew F Ducruet, Brian T Jankowitz, Ashutosh P Jadhav","doi":"10.1159/000482012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000482012","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provocative Testing Prior to Anterior Cerebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm Embolization.\",\"authors\":\"Pouria Moshayedi, Dan-Victor Giurgiutiu, Andrew F Ducruet, Brian T Jankowitz, Ashutosh P Jadhav\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000482012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000482012\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000482012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000482012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Provocative Testing Prior to Anterior Cerebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysm Embolization.
We report 2 cases of parent artery occlusion (PAO) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fusiform aneurysm embolization after superselective provocative testing was performed to confirm distal territory viability. The first case involves a patient in the second decade of life who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent PAO after a balloon test occlusion in the distal ACA revealed no neurophysiology changes. The second case involves another patient in the forth decade of life who presented with an enlarging pseudoaneurysm and underwent PAO after a sodium amobarbital infusion in the distal ACA revealed no clinical change. Both patients tolerated PAO without clinical compromise. PAO after provocative testing may be a safe and effective strategy in the management of fusiform aneurysm treatment.
Key messages: Provocative testing with superselective balloon test occlusion and sodium amobarbital infusion are both viable options for clinical and physiological interrogation of brain tissue prior to parent vessel occlusion. Neurophysiological monitoring may be a useful surrogate for clinical examination after provocative testing, particularly if patients were treated under general anesthesia.