[填写问卷时忽略指示与反应偏差的关系]。

Q4 Psychology
Shinya Masuda, Takayuki Sakagami, Kazuyo Kitaoka, Megumi Sasaki
{"title":"[填写问卷时忽略指示与反应偏差的关系]。","authors":"Shinya Masuda,&nbsp;Takayuki Sakagami,&nbsp;Kazuyo Kitaoka,&nbsp;Megumi Sasaki","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.87.15034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Certain participants are insincere, or careless when they respond to questionnaires. To identify such participants, we included three items in a questionnaire that instructed participants to choose a particular response category. Nurses (N = 1,000) responded to this questionnaire in a Web survey. One-hundred-twenty participants failed to follow the instructions for at least one item (non-followers). Analyzing their responses indicated the following: (a) non-followers were more likely to give identical, or midpoint responses; (b) the correlations between their responses to regular and reversed items were low or positive, and their responses to scales containing reversed items tended to show lower internal consistency; and finally, (c) the mean scores of non-followers were closer to the midpoint of the scale, regardless of whether the scale included reversed items. One reason that including reversed items lead to lower internal consistency could be because participants occasionally missed responding to these items. However, the results suggested that non-followers were not diligent in responding to regular items, and merely deleting reversed items from scales will be insufficient to ensure accurate results.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Relationships between ignoring instructions and response bias when completing questionnaires].\",\"authors\":\"Shinya Masuda,&nbsp;Takayuki Sakagami,&nbsp;Kazuyo Kitaoka,&nbsp;Megumi Sasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.4992/jjpsy.87.15034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Certain participants are insincere, or careless when they respond to questionnaires. To identify such participants, we included three items in a questionnaire that instructed participants to choose a particular response category. Nurses (N = 1,000) responded to this questionnaire in a Web survey. One-hundred-twenty participants failed to follow the instructions for at least one item (non-followers). Analyzing their responses indicated the following: (a) non-followers were more likely to give identical, or midpoint responses; (b) the correlations between their responses to regular and reversed items were low or positive, and their responses to scales containing reversed items tended to show lower internal consistency; and finally, (c) the mean scores of non-followers were closer to the midpoint of the scale, regardless of whether the scale included reversed items. One reason that including reversed items lead to lower internal consistency could be because participants occasionally missed responding to these items. However, the results suggested that non-followers were not diligent in responding to regular items, and merely deleting reversed items from scales will be insufficient to ensure accurate results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.15034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.15034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

某些参与者在回答问卷时不真诚,或者粗心大意。为了识别这样的参与者,我们在问卷中包括三个项目,指导参与者选择一个特定的回答类别。护士(N = 1000)通过网络调查回答了此问卷。120名参与者至少有一项没有按照指示去做(非参与者)。分析他们的回答表明:(a)非追随者更有可能给出相同的或中间点的回答;(b)学生对常规题和反向题的反应呈低相关或正相关,对包含反向题的量表的反应呈现较低的内部一致性;最后,(c)无论量表是否包含反向项目,非追随者的平均得分更接近量表的中点。包括反向项目导致内部一致性降低的一个原因可能是因为参与者偶尔会错过对这些项目的回应。然而,结果表明,非追随者并不勤奋地回应常规项目,仅仅从量表中删除反向项目将不足以确保准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Relationships between ignoring instructions and response bias when completing questionnaires].

Certain participants are insincere, or careless when they respond to questionnaires. To identify such participants, we included three items in a questionnaire that instructed participants to choose a particular response category. Nurses (N = 1,000) responded to this questionnaire in a Web survey. One-hundred-twenty participants failed to follow the instructions for at least one item (non-followers). Analyzing their responses indicated the following: (a) non-followers were more likely to give identical, or midpoint responses; (b) the correlations between their responses to regular and reversed items were low or positive, and their responses to scales containing reversed items tended to show lower internal consistency; and finally, (c) the mean scores of non-followers were closer to the midpoint of the scale, regardless of whether the scale included reversed items. One reason that including reversed items lead to lower internal consistency could be because participants occasionally missed responding to these items. However, the results suggested that non-followers were not diligent in responding to regular items, and merely deleting reversed items from scales will be insufficient to ensure accurate results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信