{"title":"晚发性类风湿关节炎:观察性研究。","authors":"Sylejman Rexhepi, Mjellma Rexhepi, Vjollca Sahatçiu-Meka, Blerta Rexhepi, Elton Bahtiri, Vigan Mahmutaj","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have an onset at older age. The onset of the disease at the age of 60 and\nover is called late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA). The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical, laboratory,\nradiological, and treatment characteristics of patients with LORA compared to those with early-onset RA (EaORA),\nprovided that all the patients had an approximately equal duration of the disease. This is an observational single-center\nstudy, which involved 120 patients with an established diagnosis of RA, of which 60 patients had LORA, and 60 patients\nEaORA. The disease activity, measured by the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28-ESR), was significantly higher in the\nLORA group compared to the EaORA group (p<0.05). Significantly more patients with LORA had involvement of the\nshoulders (LORA vs. EaORA, 30% vs. 15%; p <0.05) and knees (LORA vs. EaORA, 46.7% vs. 16.7%; p <0.05). Radiological\nerosive changes were significantly more frequent in the LORA group in comparison with EaORA (p <0.05).\nThere was no difference between the groups regarding rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity (p>0.05), while the number\nof patients positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) was signifi cantly greater in the EaORA group\n(p<0.05). The values of C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly higher\nin the LORA than in the EaORA group. Hemoglobin levels were lower in the LORA group (11.96±1.64 g/dL) than in\nthe EaORA group (12.18±1.56 g/dL). The most used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were methotrexate\nand sulfasalazine, while biological drugs were not used.\nIn conclusion, based on the results of our study, LORA has some features that distinguish it from EaORA, such as\nhigher disease activity, more frequent involvement of large joints, and more pronounced structural damage. This\nshould be taken in account in clinical practice, especially regarding treatment choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":76426,"journal":{"name":"Reumatizam","volume":"63 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late onset rheumatoid arthritis an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Sylejman Rexhepi, Mjellma Rexhepi, Vjollca Sahatçiu-Meka, Blerta Rexhepi, Elton Bahtiri, Vigan Mahmutaj\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have an onset at older age. The onset of the disease at the age of 60 and\\nover is called late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA). The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical, laboratory,\\nradiological, and treatment characteristics of patients with LORA compared to those with early-onset RA (EaORA),\\nprovided that all the patients had an approximately equal duration of the disease. This is an observational single-center\\nstudy, which involved 120 patients with an established diagnosis of RA, of which 60 patients had LORA, and 60 patients\\nEaORA. The disease activity, measured by the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28-ESR), was significantly higher in the\\nLORA group compared to the EaORA group (p<0.05). Significantly more patients with LORA had involvement of the\\nshoulders (LORA vs. EaORA, 30% vs. 15%; p <0.05) and knees (LORA vs. EaORA, 46.7% vs. 16.7%; p <0.05). Radiological\\nerosive changes were significantly more frequent in the LORA group in comparison with EaORA (p <0.05).\\nThere was no difference between the groups regarding rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity (p>0.05), while the number\\nof patients positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) was signifi cantly greater in the EaORA group\\n(p<0.05). The values of C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly higher\\nin the LORA than in the EaORA group. Hemoglobin levels were lower in the LORA group (11.96±1.64 g/dL) than in\\nthe EaORA group (12.18±1.56 g/dL). The most used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were methotrexate\\nand sulfasalazine, while biological drugs were not used.\\nIn conclusion, based on the results of our study, LORA has some features that distinguish it from EaORA, such as\\nhigher disease activity, more frequent involvement of large joints, and more pronounced structural damage. This\\nshould be taken in account in clinical practice, especially regarding treatment choices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reumatizam\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reumatizam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatizam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Late onset rheumatoid arthritis an observational study.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have an onset at older age. The onset of the disease at the age of 60 and
over is called late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA). The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical, laboratory,
radiological, and treatment characteristics of patients with LORA compared to those with early-onset RA (EaORA),
provided that all the patients had an approximately equal duration of the disease. This is an observational single-center
study, which involved 120 patients with an established diagnosis of RA, of which 60 patients had LORA, and 60 patients
EaORA. The disease activity, measured by the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28-ESR), was significantly higher in the
LORA group compared to the EaORA group (p<0.05). Significantly more patients with LORA had involvement of the
shoulders (LORA vs. EaORA, 30% vs. 15%; p <0.05) and knees (LORA vs. EaORA, 46.7% vs. 16.7%; p <0.05). Radiological
erosive changes were significantly more frequent in the LORA group in comparison with EaORA (p <0.05).
There was no difference between the groups regarding rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity (p>0.05), while the number
of patients positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) was signifi cantly greater in the EaORA group
(p<0.05). The values of C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly higher
in the LORA than in the EaORA group. Hemoglobin levels were lower in the LORA group (11.96±1.64 g/dL) than in
the EaORA group (12.18±1.56 g/dL). The most used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were methotrexate
and sulfasalazine, while biological drugs were not used.
In conclusion, based on the results of our study, LORA has some features that distinguish it from EaORA, such as
higher disease activity, more frequent involvement of large joints, and more pronounced structural damage. This
should be taken in account in clinical practice, especially regarding treatment choices.