由人胰岛和人成纤维细胞、骨髓来源的间充质干细胞或脂肪来源的间充质干细胞组成的工程细胞片:一项体外比较研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Islets Pub Date : 2018-05-04 Epub Date: 2018-04-02 DOI:10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948
Hajime Imamura, Tomohiko Adachi, Tatsuya Kin, Shinichiro Ono, Yusuke Sakai, Toshiyuki Adachi, Akihiko Soyama, Masaaki Hidaka, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, A M James Shapiro, Susumu Eguchi
{"title":"由人胰岛和人成纤维细胞、骨髓来源的间充质干细胞或脂肪来源的间充质干细胞组成的工程细胞片:一项体外比较研究。","authors":"Hajime Imamura,&nbsp;Tomohiko Adachi,&nbsp;Tatsuya Kin,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ono,&nbsp;Yusuke Sakai,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Adachi,&nbsp;Akihiko Soyama,&nbsp;Masaaki Hidaka,&nbsp;Mitsuhisa Takatsuki,&nbsp;A M James Shapiro,&nbsp;Susumu Eguchi","doi":"10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously reported the utility of engineered cell sheets composed of human islets and supporting cells in vitro and in vivo. It is unclear which type of supporting cell is most suitable for constructing cell sheets with human islets. The present study aimed to compare human fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) as a supporting source for cell sheets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Engineered cell sheets were fabricated with human islets using human fibroblasts, BM-MSCs, or ADSCs as supporting cells. The islet viability, recovery rate, glucose-stimulated insulin release (determined by the stimulation index), and cytokine secretion (TGF-β1, IL-6, and VEGF) of groups-including an islet-alone group as a control-were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three sheet groups consistently exhibited higher viability, recovery rate, and stimulation index values than the islet-alone group. The ADSC group showed the highest viability and recovery rate among the three sheet groups. There were no discernible differences in the stimulation index values of the groups. The fibroblast group exhibited significantly higher TGF-β1 values in comparison to the other groups. The IL-6 level of the ADSC group was more than five times higher than that of the other groups. The ADSC group showed the VEGF level; however, it did not differ from that of the BM-MSC group to a statistically significant extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Engineered cell sheets composed of islets and supporting cells had a cytoprotective effect on islets. These results suggest that individual cell types could be a more attractive source for crafting engineered cell sheets in comparison to islets alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14671,"journal":{"name":"Islets","volume":"10 3","pages":"e1445948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An engineered cell sheet composed of human islets and human fibroblast, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, or adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro comparison study.\",\"authors\":\"Hajime Imamura,&nbsp;Tomohiko Adachi,&nbsp;Tatsuya Kin,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ono,&nbsp;Yusuke Sakai,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Adachi,&nbsp;Akihiko Soyama,&nbsp;Masaaki Hidaka,&nbsp;Mitsuhisa Takatsuki,&nbsp;A M James Shapiro,&nbsp;Susumu Eguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously reported the utility of engineered cell sheets composed of human islets and supporting cells in vitro and in vivo. It is unclear which type of supporting cell is most suitable for constructing cell sheets with human islets. The present study aimed to compare human fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) as a supporting source for cell sheets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Engineered cell sheets were fabricated with human islets using human fibroblasts, BM-MSCs, or ADSCs as supporting cells. The islet viability, recovery rate, glucose-stimulated insulin release (determined by the stimulation index), and cytokine secretion (TGF-β1, IL-6, and VEGF) of groups-including an islet-alone group as a control-were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three sheet groups consistently exhibited higher viability, recovery rate, and stimulation index values than the islet-alone group. The ADSC group showed the highest viability and recovery rate among the three sheet groups. There were no discernible differences in the stimulation index values of the groups. The fibroblast group exhibited significantly higher TGF-β1 values in comparison to the other groups. The IL-6 level of the ADSC group was more than five times higher than that of the other groups. The ADSC group showed the VEGF level; however, it did not differ from that of the BM-MSC group to a statistically significant extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Engineered cell sheets composed of islets and supporting cells had a cytoprotective effect on islets. These results suggest that individual cell types could be a more attractive source for crafting engineered cell sheets in comparison to islets alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islets\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"e1445948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19382014.2018.1445948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景:我们之前报道了由人胰岛和支持细胞组成的工程细胞片在体外和体内的应用。目前尚不清楚哪种类型的支持细胞最适合用人类胰岛构建细胞片。本研究旨在比较人成纤维细胞、骨髓源间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs)和脂肪源间充质干细胞(ADSCs)作为细胞片的支持来源。方法:以人成纤维细胞、人骨髓间充质干细胞或ADSCs为支持细胞,用人胰岛制备工程细胞片。比较各组(包括单独使用胰岛组作为对照)胰岛活力、恢复率、葡萄糖刺激胰岛素释放(由刺激指数确定)和细胞因子分泌(TGF-β1、IL-6和VEGF)。结果:三种膜片组均表现出比单独使用胰岛组更高的活力、恢复率和刺激指数。3个单片组中,ADSC组细胞活力和回收率最高。各组的刺激指数值无明显差异。成纤维细胞组TGF-β1值明显高于其他各组。ADSC组IL-6水平比其他组高5倍以上。ADSC组显示VEGF水平;但与BM-MSC组差异无统计学意义。结论:由胰岛及其支持细胞组成的工程细胞片对胰岛有一定的细胞保护作用。这些结果表明,与单独的胰岛相比,单个细胞类型可能是制作工程细胞片的更有吸引力的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An engineered cell sheet composed of human islets and human fibroblast, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, or adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro comparison study.

An engineered cell sheet composed of human islets and human fibroblast, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, or adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro comparison study.

An engineered cell sheet composed of human islets and human fibroblast, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, or adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro comparison study.

An engineered cell sheet composed of human islets and human fibroblast, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, or adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro comparison study.

Background: We previously reported the utility of engineered cell sheets composed of human islets and supporting cells in vitro and in vivo. It is unclear which type of supporting cell is most suitable for constructing cell sheets with human islets. The present study aimed to compare human fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) as a supporting source for cell sheets.

Methods: Engineered cell sheets were fabricated with human islets using human fibroblasts, BM-MSCs, or ADSCs as supporting cells. The islet viability, recovery rate, glucose-stimulated insulin release (determined by the stimulation index), and cytokine secretion (TGF-β1, IL-6, and VEGF) of groups-including an islet-alone group as a control-were compared.

Results: All three sheet groups consistently exhibited higher viability, recovery rate, and stimulation index values than the islet-alone group. The ADSC group showed the highest viability and recovery rate among the three sheet groups. There were no discernible differences in the stimulation index values of the groups. The fibroblast group exhibited significantly higher TGF-β1 values in comparison to the other groups. The IL-6 level of the ADSC group was more than five times higher than that of the other groups. The ADSC group showed the VEGF level; however, it did not differ from that of the BM-MSC group to a statistically significant extent.

Conclusion: Engineered cell sheets composed of islets and supporting cells had a cytoprotective effect on islets. These results suggest that individual cell types could be a more attractive source for crafting engineered cell sheets in comparison to islets alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Islets
Islets ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Islets is the first international, peer-reviewed research journal dedicated to islet biology. Islets publishes high-quality clinical and experimental research into the physiology and pathology of the islets of Langerhans. In addition to original research manuscripts, Islets is the leading source for cutting-edge Perspectives, Reviews and Commentaries. Our goal is to foster communication and a rapid exchange of information through timely publication of important results using print as well as electronic formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信