课堂评估评分系统(Pre-K)的心理测量特性:在不同幼儿环境中测量互动质量的意义。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Dan Cloney, Cuc Nguyen, Raymond J Adams, Collette Tayler, Gordon Cleveland, Karen Thorpe
{"title":"课堂评估评分系统(Pre-K)的心理测量特性:在不同幼儿环境中测量互动质量的意义。","authors":"Dan Cloney,&nbsp;Cuc Nguyen,&nbsp;Raymond J Adams,&nbsp;Collette Tayler,&nbsp;Gordon Cleveland,&nbsp;Karen Thorpe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) is an observational instrument assessing the nature of everyday interactions in educational settings. The instrument has strong theoretical groundings; however, prior empirical validation of the CLASS has exposed some psychometric weaknesses. Further the instrument has not been the subject of psychometric analysis at the indicator level. Using a large dataset including observations of 993 Australian classrooms, confirmatory factor analysis is used to replicate findings from the few existing validation studies. Item response modelling is used to examine individual indicator behaviour. Latent growth models are used to produce new findings about estimating factor scores. Findings show that the CLASS exhibits stable psychometric properties within classrooms over repeated observations. Model fit is improved and factor scores are more reliable when the repeated-observations made in administering the CLASS are accounted for statistically. It is recommended that researchers enforce a fixed number of repeated observations to minimise bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"18 3","pages":"299-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (Pre-K): Implications for Measuring Interaction Quality in Diverse Early Childhood Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Cloney,&nbsp;Cuc Nguyen,&nbsp;Raymond J Adams,&nbsp;Collette Tayler,&nbsp;Gordon Cleveland,&nbsp;Karen Thorpe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) is an observational instrument assessing the nature of everyday interactions in educational settings. The instrument has strong theoretical groundings; however, prior empirical validation of the CLASS has exposed some psychometric weaknesses. Further the instrument has not been the subject of psychometric analysis at the indicator level. Using a large dataset including observations of 993 Australian classrooms, confirmatory factor analysis is used to replicate findings from the few existing validation studies. Item response modelling is used to examine individual indicator behaviour. Latent growth models are used to produce new findings about estimating factor scores. Findings show that the CLASS exhibits stable psychometric properties within classrooms over repeated observations. Model fit is improved and factor scores are more reliable when the repeated-observations made in administering the CLASS are accounted for statistically. It is recommended that researchers enforce a fixed number of repeated observations to minimise bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"299-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

课堂评估评分系统(CLASS)是一种评估教育环境中日常互动性质的观察工具。该仪器有很强的理论基础;然而,先前的实证验证类暴露了一些心理测量的弱点。此外,该仪器尚未在指标水平上进行心理测量分析。使用包括993个澳大利亚教室观察在内的大型数据集,验证性因子分析用于复制少数现有验证性研究的结果。项目反应模型用于检查单个指标行为。潜在增长模型被用来产生关于估计因子得分的新发现。研究结果表明,通过反复观察,班级表现出稳定的课堂心理测量特性。当在管理CLASS时进行的重复观察被统计计算时,模型拟合得到改善,因子得分更可靠。建议研究人员执行固定数量的重复观察,以尽量减少偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (Pre-K): Implications for Measuring Interaction Quality in Diverse Early Childhood Settings.

The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) is an observational instrument assessing the nature of everyday interactions in educational settings. The instrument has strong theoretical groundings; however, prior empirical validation of the CLASS has exposed some psychometric weaknesses. Further the instrument has not been the subject of psychometric analysis at the indicator level. Using a large dataset including observations of 993 Australian classrooms, confirmatory factor analysis is used to replicate findings from the few existing validation studies. Item response modelling is used to examine individual indicator behaviour. Latent growth models are used to produce new findings about estimating factor scores. Findings show that the CLASS exhibits stable psychometric properties within classrooms over repeated observations. Model fit is improved and factor scores are more reliable when the repeated-observations made in administering the CLASS are accounted for statistically. It is recommended that researchers enforce a fixed number of repeated observations to minimise bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信