{"title":"医院死亡证明的质量。","authors":"Ann Sophie Schröder, Jan Sperhake","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cause-of-death-statistics and the release of the body for burial depend primarily on the information contained in the death certificate. How to handle the death certificate has been critically discussed in professional circles again and again. A retrospective review of 1,315 deaths from six acute care hospitals in Germany was carried out with regard to the quality of the death certificates, taking into account information contained in the medical records. The review covered the readability of the death certificate, the quality of the epicrisis, misclassifications relating to the manner of death and the degree of certainty regarding the cause of death. In 93 % of cases (n= 1,221), death certificates were clearly legible. In about half the cases (43.3 %, n=569), the quality of the entries in the \"epicrisis\" section was good. In 45 % of cases (n= 592), no details were provided in the \"epicrisis \" section. In 3.9 % (n = 42) of deaths classified as natural, information was given indicating a non-natural death. Most of these deaths occurred in connection with a fall or an injury (n = 27) or possible errors relating to treatment or care (n = 7). Overall, the review showed that clinicians handled the medical death certificate in a competent and careful manner. However, based on the content of the files, the review identified individual and avoidable misclassifications as to the manner of death and improbable causes of death; it also demonstrated that information on the epicrisis is often missing and needs significant improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":8171,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Kriminologie","volume":"238 5-6","pages":"198-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of death certificates in hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Sophie Schröder, Jan Sperhake\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The cause-of-death-statistics and the release of the body for burial depend primarily on the information contained in the death certificate. How to handle the death certificate has been critically discussed in professional circles again and again. A retrospective review of 1,315 deaths from six acute care hospitals in Germany was carried out with regard to the quality of the death certificates, taking into account information contained in the medical records. The review covered the readability of the death certificate, the quality of the epicrisis, misclassifications relating to the manner of death and the degree of certainty regarding the cause of death. In 93 % of cases (n= 1,221), death certificates were clearly legible. In about half the cases (43.3 %, n=569), the quality of the entries in the \\\"epicrisis\\\" section was good. In 45 % of cases (n= 592), no details were provided in the \\\"epicrisis \\\" section. In 3.9 % (n = 42) of deaths classified as natural, information was given indicating a non-natural death. Most of these deaths occurred in connection with a fall or an injury (n = 27) or possible errors relating to treatment or care (n = 7). Overall, the review showed that clinicians handled the medical death certificate in a competent and careful manner. However, based on the content of the files, the review identified individual and avoidable misclassifications as to the manner of death and improbable causes of death; it also demonstrated that information on the epicrisis is often missing and needs significant improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv fur Kriminologie\",\"volume\":\"238 5-6\",\"pages\":\"198-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv fur Kriminologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Kriminologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The cause-of-death-statistics and the release of the body for burial depend primarily on the information contained in the death certificate. How to handle the death certificate has been critically discussed in professional circles again and again. A retrospective review of 1,315 deaths from six acute care hospitals in Germany was carried out with regard to the quality of the death certificates, taking into account information contained in the medical records. The review covered the readability of the death certificate, the quality of the epicrisis, misclassifications relating to the manner of death and the degree of certainty regarding the cause of death. In 93 % of cases (n= 1,221), death certificates were clearly legible. In about half the cases (43.3 %, n=569), the quality of the entries in the "epicrisis" section was good. In 45 % of cases (n= 592), no details were provided in the "epicrisis " section. In 3.9 % (n = 42) of deaths classified as natural, information was given indicating a non-natural death. Most of these deaths occurred in connection with a fall or an injury (n = 27) or possible errors relating to treatment or care (n = 7). Overall, the review showed that clinicians handled the medical death certificate in a competent and careful manner. However, based on the content of the files, the review identified individual and avoidable misclassifications as to the manner of death and improbable causes of death; it also demonstrated that information on the epicrisis is often missing and needs significant improvement.