一项随机临床试验:颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后直接导航与交换方法的临床和影像学结果的比较。

Mojtaba Rismanchi, Afshin Borhani-Haghighi
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后直接导航与交换方法的临床和影像学结果的比较。","authors":"Mojtaba Rismanchi,&nbsp;Afshin Borhani-Haghighi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of microembolic brain infarcts after direct navigation method versus exchange method in carotid artery stenting and vertebral artery origin angioplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>This is a prospective study conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southern Iran. Consecutive patients undergoing \"carotid angioplasty and stenting\" and \"vertebral artery origin stenting\" were randomly assigned into two groups with \"direct navigation method\" and \"exchange method.\" Subsequently, postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient were obtained within the first 24 hours after completion of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 89 patients were recruited (67% male, mean age: 72 years). Cases comprised of 38 left internal carotid arteries (ICAs), 38 right ICAs, 6 left vertebral artery origin, and 7 right vertebral artery origin. Forty patients underwent exchange method, while 49 underwent direct navigation method. There was only one clinical stroke that occurred in \"exchange method\" group. Fifteen patients (37.5%) in exchange group and 23 patients (46.9%) in direct navigation group developed diffusion restricted lesions. In exchange group, 13 patients (32.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion ipsilateral to the target vessel, and three patients (7.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion contralateral to the target vessel. In direct navigation group, these measures were 19 (38.8%) and 9 (18.4%). However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed. The only significant difference was bilateral infarct percentile, which was more common in the direct navigation method (0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diffusion restricted lesions were more common in the direct navigation method, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the target vessel, and in both carotid and vertebral artery study subgroups. However, differences were not statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":88555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","volume":"9 6","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805897/pdf/jvin-9-6-11.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting after Direct Navigation Versus Exchange Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mojtaba Rismanchi,&nbsp;Afshin Borhani-Haghighi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of microembolic brain infarcts after direct navigation method versus exchange method in carotid artery stenting and vertebral artery origin angioplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>This is a prospective study conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southern Iran. Consecutive patients undergoing \\\"carotid angioplasty and stenting\\\" and \\\"vertebral artery origin stenting\\\" were randomly assigned into two groups with \\\"direct navigation method\\\" and \\\"exchange method.\\\" Subsequently, postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient were obtained within the first 24 hours after completion of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 89 patients were recruited (67% male, mean age: 72 years). Cases comprised of 38 left internal carotid arteries (ICAs), 38 right ICAs, 6 left vertebral artery origin, and 7 right vertebral artery origin. Forty patients underwent exchange method, while 49 underwent direct navigation method. There was only one clinical stroke that occurred in \\\"exchange method\\\" group. Fifteen patients (37.5%) in exchange group and 23 patients (46.9%) in direct navigation group developed diffusion restricted lesions. In exchange group, 13 patients (32.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion ipsilateral to the target vessel, and three patients (7.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion contralateral to the target vessel. In direct navigation group, these measures were 19 (38.8%) and 9 (18.4%). However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed. The only significant difference was bilateral infarct percentile, which was more common in the direct navigation method (0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diffusion restricted lesions were more common in the direct navigation method, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the target vessel, and in both carotid and vertebral artery study subgroups. However, differences were not statistically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805897/pdf/jvin-9-6-11.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较颈动脉支架置入术和椎动脉起源血管成形术中直接导航法与置换法后微栓塞性脑梗死的发生率。方法和材料:这是一项在伊朗南部设拉子医学科学大学进行的前瞻性研究。连续行“颈动脉成形术支架置入术”和“椎动脉源性支架置入术”的患者随机分为“直接导航法”和“交换法”两组。术后24小时内进行磁共振成像(MRI),包括弥散加权成像和表观弥散系数。结果:共纳入89例患者(男性67%,平均年龄72岁)。病例包括38条左颈内动脉,38条右颈内动脉,6条左椎动脉起始点,7条右椎动脉起始点。交换法40例,直接导航法49例。“交换法”组仅发生1例临床卒中。交换组15例(37.5%),直接导航组23例(46.9%)出现弥漫性病变。交换组中,13例(32.5%)患者在靶血管同侧至少有一个弥漫性病变,3例(7.5%)患者在靶血管对侧至少有一个弥漫性病变。直航组分别为19例(38.8%)和9例(18.4%)。然而,组间差异无统计学意义。唯一显著差异是双侧梗死百分位数,直接导航法更常见(0.032)。结论:在直接导航法、靶血管的同侧和对侧、颈动脉和椎动脉研究亚组中弥散限制性病变更为常见。然而,差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting after Direct Navigation Versus Exchange Methods: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of microembolic brain infarcts after direct navigation method versus exchange method in carotid artery stenting and vertebral artery origin angioplasty.

Methods and material: This is a prospective study conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southern Iran. Consecutive patients undergoing "carotid angioplasty and stenting" and "vertebral artery origin stenting" were randomly assigned into two groups with "direct navigation method" and "exchange method." Subsequently, postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient were obtained within the first 24 hours after completion of the procedure.

Results: In total, 89 patients were recruited (67% male, mean age: 72 years). Cases comprised of 38 left internal carotid arteries (ICAs), 38 right ICAs, 6 left vertebral artery origin, and 7 right vertebral artery origin. Forty patients underwent exchange method, while 49 underwent direct navigation method. There was only one clinical stroke that occurred in "exchange method" group. Fifteen patients (37.5%) in exchange group and 23 patients (46.9%) in direct navigation group developed diffusion restricted lesions. In exchange group, 13 patients (32.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion ipsilateral to the target vessel, and three patients (7.5%) had at least one diffusion restricted lesion contralateral to the target vessel. In direct navigation group, these measures were 19 (38.8%) and 9 (18.4%). However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed. The only significant difference was bilateral infarct percentile, which was more common in the direct navigation method (0.032).

Conclusion: Diffusion restricted lesions were more common in the direct navigation method, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the target vessel, and in both carotid and vertebral artery study subgroups. However, differences were not statistically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信