使用重组组织型血浆蛋白酶原激活剂 (rtPA) 治疗糖尿病急性缺血性脑卒中人群的性别差异和专属标准调查。

Taylor Wapshott, Brice Blum, Williams Kelsey, Thomas I Nathaniel
{"title":"使用重组组织型血浆蛋白酶原激活剂 (rtPA) 治疗糖尿病急性缺血性脑卒中人群的性别差异和专属标准调查。","authors":"Taylor Wapshott, Brice Blum, Williams Kelsey, Thomas I Nathaniel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have reported that women who survive stroke have less favorable outcomes than men in the use of rtPA, while others reported worse outcomes in men than women. The gender difference in the exclusion criteria in a diabetic stroke population is not fully understood. This issue was investigated in this study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a diabetic stroke population from a stroke registry of data collected between January 2010 to June 30, 2016, the gender difference was determined using demographics and clinical factors. Comparison was determined using univariate analysis while multivariable model was used to adjust for the effect of confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a diabetic stroke population of 439 patients, more females were excluded than males (<i>P</i> < 0.0001, OR = 2.323). The male exclusion was associated with atrial fibrillation (<i>P</i> = 0.011, OR = 3.697), carotid artery stenosis (<i>P</i> = 0.023, OR = 5.001), and cholesterol reducer (<i>P</i> = 0.037, OR = 0.409). In the female diabetic stroke population, exclusion from rtPA therapy was associated with language disturbances (<i>P</i> = 0.039, OR = 0.372), history of previous stroke (<i>P</i> = 0.005, OR = 3.276), antihypertensive medication use (<i>P</i> = 0.013, OR = 0.163), and antidiabetic medication use (<i>P</i> = 0.031, OR = 0.324).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a stroke population, women have a worse outcome than men in an untreated acute ischemic stroke population, but when treated there is no significant difference, suggesting a better treatment outcome for women compared to men. In a diabetic stroke population, the clinical variables for the exclusion criteria for women and men are significantly different, even after adjustment for confounding variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":88555,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","volume":"9 6","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805905/pdf/jvin-9-6-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Gender Differences and Exclusive Criteria in a Diabetic Acute Ischemic Stroke Population Treated with Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator (rtPA).\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Wapshott, Brice Blum, Williams Kelsey, Thomas I Nathaniel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have reported that women who survive stroke have less favorable outcomes than men in the use of rtPA, while others reported worse outcomes in men than women. The gender difference in the exclusion criteria in a diabetic stroke population is not fully understood. This issue was investigated in this study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a diabetic stroke population from a stroke registry of data collected between January 2010 to June 30, 2016, the gender difference was determined using demographics and clinical factors. Comparison was determined using univariate analysis while multivariable model was used to adjust for the effect of confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a diabetic stroke population of 439 patients, more females were excluded than males (<i>P</i> < 0.0001, OR = 2.323). The male exclusion was associated with atrial fibrillation (<i>P</i> = 0.011, OR = 3.697), carotid artery stenosis (<i>P</i> = 0.023, OR = 5.001), and cholesterol reducer (<i>P</i> = 0.037, OR = 0.409). In the female diabetic stroke population, exclusion from rtPA therapy was associated with language disturbances (<i>P</i> = 0.039, OR = 0.372), history of previous stroke (<i>P</i> = 0.005, OR = 3.276), antihypertensive medication use (<i>P</i> = 0.013, OR = 0.163), and antidiabetic medication use (<i>P</i> = 0.031, OR = 0.324).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a stroke population, women have a worse outcome than men in an untreated acute ischemic stroke population, but when treated there is no significant difference, suggesting a better treatment outcome for women compared to men. In a diabetic stroke population, the clinical variables for the exclusion criteria for women and men are significantly different, even after adjustment for confounding variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"26-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805905/pdf/jvin-9-6-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular and interventional neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多研究报告称,在使用 rtPA 时,女性卒中幸存者的预后不如男性,而其他研究报告称,男性卒中幸存者的预后不如女性。糖尿病脑卒中患者在排除标准上的性别差异尚未完全明了。本研究对这一问题进行了调查:方法:在 2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月 30 日期间收集的卒中登记数据的糖尿病卒中人群中,通过人口统计学和临床因素确定性别差异。采用单变量分析进行比较,同时使用多变量模型调整混杂变量的影响:在439名糖尿病脑卒中患者中,被排除的女性多于男性(P < 0.0001,OR = 2.323)。男性被排除与心房颤动(P = 0.011,OR = 3.697)、颈动脉狭窄(P = 0.023,OR = 5.001)和胆固醇降低有关(P = 0.037,OR = 0.409)。在女性糖尿病卒中人群中,排除 rtPA 治疗与语言障碍(P = 0.039,OR = 0.372)、既往卒中史(P = 0.005,OR = 3.276)、使用降压药物(P = 0.013,OR = 0.163)和使用抗糖尿病药物(P = 0.031,OR = 0.324)有关:结论:在脑卒中人群中,未经治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中女性的预后比男性差,但在接受治疗时没有明显差异,这表明女性的治疗效果优于男性。在糖尿病脑卒中人群中,即使调整了混杂变量,女性和男性在排除标准的临床变量上仍有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of Gender Differences and Exclusive Criteria in a Diabetic Acute Ischemic Stroke Population Treated with Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator (rtPA).

Background: Many studies have reported that women who survive stroke have less favorable outcomes than men in the use of rtPA, while others reported worse outcomes in men than women. The gender difference in the exclusion criteria in a diabetic stroke population is not fully understood. This issue was investigated in this study.

Method: In a diabetic stroke population from a stroke registry of data collected between January 2010 to June 30, 2016, the gender difference was determined using demographics and clinical factors. Comparison was determined using univariate analysis while multivariable model was used to adjust for the effect of confounding variables.

Results: In a diabetic stroke population of 439 patients, more females were excluded than males (P < 0.0001, OR = 2.323). The male exclusion was associated with atrial fibrillation (P = 0.011, OR = 3.697), carotid artery stenosis (P = 0.023, OR = 5.001), and cholesterol reducer (P = 0.037, OR = 0.409). In the female diabetic stroke population, exclusion from rtPA therapy was associated with language disturbances (P = 0.039, OR = 0.372), history of previous stroke (P = 0.005, OR = 3.276), antihypertensive medication use (P = 0.013, OR = 0.163), and antidiabetic medication use (P = 0.031, OR = 0.324).

Conclusion: In a stroke population, women have a worse outcome than men in an untreated acute ischemic stroke population, but when treated there is no significant difference, suggesting a better treatment outcome for women compared to men. In a diabetic stroke population, the clinical variables for the exclusion criteria for women and men are significantly different, even after adjustment for confounding variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信